本文選題：李莊案 + 法治��； 參考：《中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：2009年末，正值重慶“打黑除惡”行動(dòng)進(jìn)行之時(shí)，原北京康達(dá)律師事務(wù)所律師李莊涉嫌觸犯辯護(hù)人偽造證據(jù)、妨害作證罪一案，成為我國(guó)法學(xué)理論界和司法實(shí)務(wù)界，，乃至全社會(huì)關(guān)注的熱點(diǎn)。2010年2月，重慶市第一中級(jí)人民法院二審判決李莊構(gòu)成辯護(hù)人偽造證據(jù)、妨害作證罪，判處有期徒刑一年六個(gè)月。媒體、公眾和學(xué)界將此一時(shí)期的李莊案稱為“李莊第一季”。2011年4月，李莊在重慶服刑期間因同一罪名再次被提起公訴，經(jīng)法院審理后檢方撤回起訴。此一時(shí)期的李莊案也被稱為“李莊第二季”。李莊出獄后，于2011年12月向原審法院提出申訴，拉開了“李莊第三季”的帷幕。截至論文完成之際，“李莊第三季”尚無(wú)結(jié)果。但毫無(wú)疑問(wèn)的是，由上述一系列事件所組成的李莊案是近幾年我國(guó)法律界關(guān)注的焦點(diǎn)，也被公認(rèn)為我國(guó)法治進(jìn)程中的標(biāo)志性案件。 今天，李莊案的風(fēng)波尚未平息，但該案中的公安機(jī)關(guān)違法辦案、審判程序存在瑕疵、司法受到干預(yù)等現(xiàn)象，皆可折射出我國(guó)法治環(huán)境令人憂慮的現(xiàn)狀、法律及相關(guān)司法制度的不完善。在充分認(rèn)識(shí)上述問(wèn)題的基礎(chǔ)上，論文以李莊案為素材，對(duì)該案的案情和涉及的法律問(wèn)題進(jìn)行了全面梳理和思考，將李莊案上升到國(guó)家法治層面進(jìn)行了研究。通過(guò)對(duì)此案的研究，揭示了法治對(duì)于今日中國(guó)的重要意義。 論文共有五章：第一章概述了李莊案的來(lái)龍去脈、法律界對(duì)該案的基本認(rèn)識(shí)及筆者自己的理解。第二章以李莊案為視角，分析了律師偽證罪存在的問(wèn)題，并提出了立法上的修改建議。第三章通過(guò)分析由李莊案折射出的我國(guó)律師在執(zhí)業(yè)當(dāng)中遇到的困難，探討了我國(guó)律師制度的不足之處以及如何使其更加完善。第四章以李莊案為例，剖析了我國(guó)刑事訴訟制度存在的缺陷和2012年《刑事訴訟法》修改的部分內(nèi)容，并探討了我國(guó)刑事訴訟制度的發(fā)展方向。第五章討論了李莊案和中國(guó)法治建設(shè)的關(guān)系，重點(diǎn)闡述了律師對(duì)我國(guó)法治建設(shè)的作用和司法改革的方向。
[Abstract]:At the end of 2009, at the time of Chongqing's "cracking down on criminal elements and eliminating evil", Li Zhuang, a lawyer of the former Beijing Kangda Law firm, was suspected of committing the crime of forgery of evidence and obstruction of testimony by defenders, thus becoming the legal theorists and judicial practitioners in our country. In February 2010, Chongqing No. 1 Intermediate people's Court sentenced Li Zhuang to forgery of evidence and obstruction of testimony, and sentenced to imprisonment of one year and six months. The media, the public and academics called the Li Zhuang case of this period "Li Zhuang season 1." in April 2011, Li Zhuang was prosecuted again for the same offence while serving his sentence in Chongqing, and the prosecution withdrew the indictment after a court hearing. The Li Zhuang case during this period is also known as Li Zhuang season 2. Li Zhuang filed a complaint with the trial court in December 2011, opening the third season of Li Zhuang. At the time of completion of the paper, Li Zhuang season 3 had no results. But there is no doubt that the Li Zhuang case composed of the above mentioned events is the focus of our country's legal circles in recent years, and it is also recognized as the iconic case in the process of our country's rule of law. Today, the storm in the Li Zhuang case has not subsided, but the public security organs in the case have handled cases illegally, the trial procedures have been flawed, the judicial system has been interfered, and so on, all of which can reflect the worrying present situation of the legal environment in our country. The imperfections of the law and related judicial system. On the basis of fully understanding the above problems, the paper takes the Li Zhuang case as the material, the case of the case and the legal issues involved in a comprehensive combing and thinking, the Li Zhuang case rose to the level of the rule of law. Through the study of this case, it reveals the significance of the rule of law to China today. There are five chapters: the first chapter summarizes the origin of the Li Zhuang case, the basic understanding of the legal profession and the author's own understanding. In the second chapter, the author analyzes the problems of perjury from the perspective of Li Zhuang case, and puts forward some legislative suggestions. The third chapter analyzes the difficulties of Chinese lawyers in practice reflected by Li Zhuang case, and discusses the shortcomings of our lawyer system and how to make it more perfect. The fourth chapter takes the case of Li Zhuang as an example, analyzes the defects of the criminal procedure system in China and some contents of the revision of the Criminal procedure Law in 2012, and probes into the developing direction of the criminal procedure system in our country. The fifth chapter discusses the relationship between the Li Zhuang case and the construction of the rule of law in China, focusing on the role of lawyers in the construction of the rule of law in China and the direction of judicial reform.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D920.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王德志;以保障法官獨(dú)立為核心推進(jìn)司法改革[J];法商研究(中南政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));1999年01期

2 卞建林;;改革開放30年中國(guó)刑事訴訟制度發(fā)展之回顧與展望[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年01期

3 "檢察過(guò)程中律師權(quán)利保障問(wèn)題研究"課題組;張兆凱;陳忠;冷必元;劉記福;;律師偽證罪應(yīng)當(dāng)存而慎用[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年03期

4 張衛(wèi)兵;論我國(guó)《刑法》第306條、307條的立法完善[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2003年05期

5 張德淼,周佑勇;論當(dāng)前我國(guó)實(shí)現(xiàn)司法正義的條件和途徑[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年01期

6 戚淵;司法如何公正——一種尊重常識(shí)的論述[J];法學(xué);1999年12期

7 龍宗智;;李莊案法理研判——主要從證據(jù)學(xué)的角度[J];法學(xué);2010年02期

8 李揚(yáng);劉湖平;;淺析《刑法》第306條之立法缺陷[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年09期

9 任莎莎;;淺析《刑法》第306條的不足與完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年21期

10 張玉鑲;門金玲;;刑法第306條的理性解讀[J];河北法學(xué);2007年02期

本文編號(hào)：2083253