本文選題：法院附設(shè)調(diào)解 + 司法ADR��； 參考：《廣東商學(xué)院》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：二十世紀(jì)末,人類社會(huì)發(fā)生著翻天覆地的變化,伴隨著變化而來的是糾紛的大量涌現(xiàn)。民事訴訟在解決糾紛方面越發(fā)顯得力不從心。一種新興的糾紛解決機(jī)制映入人們眼簾。這就是ADR。法院附設(shè)調(diào)解作為ADR的重要表現(xiàn)形式之一,最近幾十年來受到了密切的關(guān)注。國(guó)內(nèi)多數(shù)學(xué)者未將其納入訴訟外糾紛解決機(jī)制內(nèi),而是將其納入訴訟領(lǐng)域進(jìn)行研討,對(duì)制度的建構(gòu)部分論述得也相對(duì)簡(jiǎn)單。實(shí)踐中,不少法院開始嘗試建立新型的法院調(diào)解制度。但由于缺乏法律的規(guī)定,導(dǎo)致在改革過程中方式各異。 基于此,本文研究并提出在我國(guó)構(gòu)建法院附設(shè)調(diào)解制度的理論基礎(chǔ)和具體設(shè)想,以期對(duì)理論研究與司法實(shí)踐有積極的意義。本文共分為四個(gè)部分: 第一章是對(duì)法院附設(shè)調(diào)解的基本原理研究。內(nèi)容涉及法院附設(shè)調(diào)解的概念、特征,性質(zhì),理論基礎(chǔ)以及與其他調(diào)解制度的比較。 第二章論述我國(guó)構(gòu)建法院附設(shè)調(diào)解制度的必要性和可行性分析。在必要性分析方面,提出訴訟固有的局限性與國(guó)情對(duì)糾紛解決的制約的問題,并對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)階段法院調(diào)解制度的立法現(xiàn)狀和實(shí)踐狀況分別進(jìn)行考察,指出各自存在的缺陷。在可行性研究方面,主要從三個(gè)方面展開,第一是法院司法政策的轉(zhuǎn)變,第二是理論研究的基礎(chǔ);最后是各地法院對(duì)訴訟調(diào)解改革的試點(diǎn)及其經(jīng)驗(yàn)。 第三章對(duì)域外法院附設(shè)調(diào)解制度進(jìn)行考察,尋求對(duì)我國(guó)構(gòu)建法院附設(shè)調(diào)解制度的借鑒意義。 第四章論述構(gòu)建法院附設(shè)調(diào)解的具體構(gòu)想。本章從三大方面提出完善的建議。首先涉及法院附設(shè)調(diào)解制度的立法,其次是法院附設(shè)調(diào)解制度的主體措施,最后是提出法院附設(shè)調(diào)解的配套保障措施。
[Abstract]:At the end of 20 ~ (th) century, the human society has undergone tremendous changes, accompanied by the emergence of a large number of disputes. Civil litigation has become increasingly inadequate in resolving disputes. A new kind of dispute resolution mechanism came into people's eyes. This is ADR. As one of the important manifestations of ADR, court-attached mediation has received close attention in recent decades. Most domestic scholars do not bring it into the dispute settlement mechanism outside litigation, but they study it in the field of litigation, and the construction of the system is relatively simple. In practice, many courts began to try to establish a new court mediation system. However, due to the lack of legal provisions, resulting in different ways in the reform process. Based on this, this paper studies and puts forward the theoretical basis and concrete idea of constructing the mediation system attached to the court in our country, which is expected to have positive significance for theoretical research and judicial practice. This paper is divided into four parts: the first chapter is about the basic principle of court-attached mediation. The content involves the concept, characteristics, nature, theoretical basis and comparison with other mediation systems. The second chapter discusses the necessity and feasibility of constructing the court-attached mediation system in China. In the aspect of necessity analysis, the author puts forward the inherent limitation of litigation and the restriction of national conditions on dispute resolution, and investigates the present legislation and practice of the court mediation system in China, and points out their defects. In the aspect of feasibility study, it is mainly carried out from three aspects: the first is the transformation of the court's judicial policy, the second is the basis of the theoretical research, and the last is the trial and experience of the courts' reform of litigation mediation. The third chapter investigates the mediation system attached to foreign courts and seeks for reference to the construction of court-attached mediation system in China. Chapter four discusses the concrete conception of constructing court-attached mediation. This chapter puts forward some suggestions from three aspects. First, it involves the legislation of the court-attached mediation system, secondly, the main measures of the court-attached mediation system, and finally, it puts forward the supporting safeguard measures of court-attached mediation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東商學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱林兵;;試論我國(guó)刑事辯護(hù)制度的理論基礎(chǔ)[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2008年04期

2 蔡從燕;英國(guó)民事司法改革架構(gòu)中的ADR及其借鑒意義[J];福建政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

3 王銳;;澳大利亞聯(lián)邦法院對(duì)調(diào)解服務(wù)的監(jiān)督和評(píng)估[J];法律適用;2008年10期

4 章武生,張大海;論德國(guó)的起訴前強(qiáng)制調(diào)解制度[J];法商研究;2004年06期

5 毛淑玲;;法院調(diào)解與法院附設(shè)調(diào)解[J];法學(xué)雜志;2008年04期

6 李子煊;;對(duì)我國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)參與公益訴訟的思索[J];淮南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年04期

7 陳琦華;;適用法院附設(shè)ADR制度處理相鄰權(quán)糾紛研究[J];安徽警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

8 閆慶霞;;中日訴訟外調(diào)解制度比較[J];暨南學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2006年04期

9 毛興平;劉艷芳;;法院附設(shè)調(diào)解制度與法院調(diào)解制度之比較[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期

10 孫永軍;;法院調(diào)解改革新論[J];前沿;2006年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 洪冬英;當(dāng)代中國(guó)調(diào)解制度的變遷研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2007年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 衛(wèi)玲丹;家事調(diào)解程序研究[D];太原科技大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：2072540