本文選題：強制執(zhí)行 + 債權(quán)文書　； 參考：《西南政法大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：通過公證賦予符合一定條件的債權(quán)文書以強制執(zhí)行效力是公證機構(gòu)的一項特殊職能。公證債權(quán)文書具有的強制執(zhí)行效力,使債權(quán)人的債權(quán)無須經(jīng)過司法機關的裁判逕可進入執(zhí)行程序而得以順利實現(xiàn),既避免了司法資源的浪費,又提供了當事人各方所尋求的交易安全與法律秩序。因其便捷、經(jīng)濟的優(yōu)點,賦予強制執(zhí)行效力的債權(quán)文書公證隨著我國社會經(jīng)濟的快速發(fā)展已經(jīng)成為越來越多的當事人為保障債權(quán)實現(xiàn)而選擇的一種法律手段。但由于我國法律法規(guī)對賦予強制執(zhí)行效力的債權(quán)文書公證制度的規(guī)定過于粗陋,長期以來理論界和實務界、公證機構(gòu)和法院等相關各方對該項制度的理解存在巨大差異,致使大量公證債權(quán)文書在司法實踐中的強制執(zhí)行現(xiàn)狀差強人意,未能充分發(fā)揮其應有的職能作用。因此,本文立足于我國司法實踐,主要運用法理分析和實證分析的方法,對賦予強制執(zhí)行效力的債權(quán)文書公證的法理基礎、實踐價值、存在問題等方面進行深入闡析,以此探討完善這一公證制度的路徑和方法。 本文共計33000余字,除引言外,正文共分為三個部分: 第一部分對賦予強制執(zhí)行效力的債權(quán)文書公證的基本原理進行詳細的論述,通過界定概念、分析特征、介紹歷史沿革,闡析其法理基礎和實踐價值。 第二部分針對賦予強制執(zhí)行效力的債權(quán)文書公證制度在我國司法實踐中存在的若干問題進行剖析,在執(zhí)行范圍、公證核實、執(zhí)行期限、不可訴性、法院審查和執(zhí)行異議處理等方面提出筆者的見解。 第三部分論述我國賦予強制執(zhí)行效力的債權(quán)文書公證制度的完善建議,提出通過適當擴大賦予強制執(zhí)行效力債權(quán)文書的范圍、統(tǒng)一公證機構(gòu)簽發(fā)執(zhí)行證書的標準、減少法院作出不予執(zhí)行裁定的隨意性、完善執(zhí)行異議制度等途徑來完善該公證制度,確保其充分發(fā)揮規(guī)范民商事經(jīng)濟活動、維護正常法律秩序、保護當事人合法權(quán)益的職能作用。
[Abstract]:It is a special function of notarization institution to enforce the creditor's rights through notarization. The compulsory enforcement effect of the notarized creditor's rights document enables the creditor's claims to be realized smoothly without going through the judicial decision, thus avoiding the waste of judicial resources. It also provides the transaction security and legal order sought by the parties. Because of its convenience and economic advantages, the notarization of obligatory documents with the enforcement effect has become a kind of legal means chosen by more and more parties in order to guarantee the realization of creditor's rights with the rapid development of our country's social economy. However, due to the rudimentary stipulation of the legalization system of creditor's rights that gives enforcement effect in our country's laws and regulations, there is a great difference in the understanding of this system between the theoretical and practical circles, notaries and courts for a long time. As a result, a large number of notarized creditor's rights documents in the judicial practice of the enforcement of the situation is unsatisfactory, failed to give full play to its due function. Therefore, based on the judicial practice of our country, this paper mainly uses the methods of legal theory analysis and empirical analysis to analyze deeply the legal basis, practical value, existing problems and so on of notarization of creditor's rights documents that endow the enforcement effect. This paper discusses the ways and methods of perfecting the notarization system. In addition to the introduction, the text is divided into three parts: the first part discusses in detail the basic principles of notarization of creditor's rights documents with enforcement effect, and analyzes the characteristics by defining the concept. This paper introduces the evolution of history and expounds its legal basis and practical value. The second part analyzes some problems existing in the system of notarization of creditor's rights which endows the enforcement effect in the judicial practice of our country, in the execution scope, the notarization verification, the execution time limit, the non-litigability, The author's opinion is put forward in the aspects of court review and execution of dissent. The third part discusses the perfect suggestions of the notarization system of the creditor's rights document which gives the enforcement effect in our country, and puts forward that the standard of issuing the execution certificate by the notary authority should be unified by expanding the scope of the creditor's rights document with the enforcement effect appropriately. Reducing the arbitrariness of the court's decision not to execute, perfecting the system of execution of dissent, and so on, to perfect the notarization system, to ensure its full play in regulating civil and commercial economic activities, and to maintain the normal legal order, The function of protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.6

【引證文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 張邦鋪;李雪榕;;公證債權(quán)文書強制執(zhí)行制度存在的問題及完善建議——以C市法院受理的公證債權(quán)文書執(zhí)行案件為例[J];西華大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2013年02期

，

本文編號：2070715