本文選題：人民陪審員 + 選任制度　； 參考：《延邊大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),隨著我國(guó)民主法治建設(shè)進(jìn)程的加快,致力于陪審制度的改革也被提上了議事日程。擔(dān)任人民陪審員是公民的一項(xiàng)基本權(quán)利,而如何使公民的這項(xiàng)權(quán)利得到更好的法律保障,使公民能夠更加公正有序地參與到案件審理中來(lái),則是人民陪審員選任制度改革的前提和關(guān)鍵。然而,隨著改革試點(diǎn)工作的進(jìn)行,人民陪審員選任制度存在的問(wèn)題也不斷出現(xiàn)。例如:擔(dān)任人民陪審員究竟是公民的權(quán)利還是公民的義務(wù);如何能夠?qū)崿F(xiàn)選任人民陪審員的廣泛性和隨機(jī)性;如何完善人民陪審員的管理和保障機(jī)制;怎樣提高人民陪審員的積極性等等。針對(duì)上述問(wèn)題,本文希望通過(guò)文獻(xiàn)資料分析法、比較分析法、規(guī)范分析法等研究方法對(duì)人民陪審員選任制度及其在司法實(shí)踐中存在的問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探索和探究,通過(guò)將人民陪審員選任制度寫(xiě)入憲法,加快人民陪審員選任制度的立法步伐,提高陪審員隨機(jī)抽選的廣泛性和代表性,切實(shí)保障公民擔(dān)任人民陪審員的各項(xiàng)程序性和實(shí)體性權(quán)利,提高人民陪審員參加司法審判的待遇和補(bǔ)助,提升公民擔(dān)任人民陪審員的積極性和責(zé)任感,提高人民陪審員的參與意識(shí)與公民意識(shí),為人民陪審員制度的改革提供人員保障。本論文由以下幾個(gè)部分組成:第一章:緒論。該部分主要包括國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于陪審員選任制度的研究現(xiàn)狀,本文的研究目的、研究意義及研究方法等。第二章:人民陪審員選任制度概述。這部分主要介紹了人民陪審員選任制度的概念、內(nèi)容、原則、特點(diǎn)、人民陪審員的性質(zhì),以及人民陪審員選任的障礙性因素等等。第三章:該部分重點(diǎn)介紹了人民陪審員選任制度試點(diǎn)改革的現(xiàn)狀及其在改革過(guò)程中存在的問(wèn)題。具體包括:法律對(duì)于公民有無(wú)擔(dān)任人民陪審員的義務(wù)尚無(wú)明確規(guī)定、已選任的人民陪審員的數(shù)量尚無(wú)法達(dá)到員額法官五倍以上的是要求、目前的選任條件也缺乏可操作性、陪審員的隨機(jī)抽選存在困難、人民陪審員的管理和保障機(jī)制有待完善、公民缺乏對(duì)擔(dān)任人民陪審員的認(rèn)識(shí),其參加人民陪審員選任的積極性有待提高。第四章:陪審員選任制度的國(guó)外借鑒。這一部分主要介紹了幾個(gè)典型國(guó)家的陪審制度(參審制度)中關(guān)于陪審員如何選任的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和做法,包括陪審制度的濫觴——英國(guó)、以及美國(guó)等英美法系國(guó)家的陪審團(tuán)制度,陪審制度出生在英國(guó),發(fā)展壯大卻在美國(guó),也包括法國(guó)、德國(guó)、日本、韓國(guó)等大陸法系國(guó)家的參審制度中關(guān)于陪審員、參審員選任的現(xiàn)狀和做法,通過(guò)學(xué)習(xí)和比較國(guó)外有關(guān)陪審員選任的立法經(jīng)驗(yàn)和司法實(shí)踐,對(duì)于改革和完善我國(guó)人民陪審員選任制度具有重要的借鑒意義。第五章:針對(duì)人民陪審員選任制度存在的的問(wèn)題以及國(guó)外的經(jīng)驗(yàn)和做法,對(duì)我國(guó)人民陪審員選任制度提出了幾點(diǎn)完善建議。具體包括:起草并制定《人民陪審員法》、將人民陪審員選任制度寫(xiě)入憲法、實(shí)行人民陪審員的一案一選和隨機(jī)抽選、完善人民陪審員的保障機(jī)制、提高人民陪審員參與司法審判的積極性等等,保障公民能夠依法有序地參與案件的審理,促進(jìn)司法民主、司法公開(kāi)和司法公正。第六章:結(jié)語(yǔ)。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the accelerating process of the construction of democracy and the rule of law in China, the reform of the jury system has also been put on the agenda. It is a basic right of the people to serve as a citizen, and how to make this right of citizens better legal guarantee and enable citizens to participate more impartially and orderly in the trial. The precondition and key of the system reform of the people's jurors' elective system, however, with the reform pilot work, the problems of the people's jurors' selection system have appeared, for example, whether the people's jurors are citizens' rights or citizens' obligations, how to realize the universality and randomness of the elected people's jurors; how to finish it? The management and guarantee mechanism of the good people's jurors; how to improve the enthusiasm of the people's jurors. In view of the above questions, this article hopes to explore and explore the problems of the people's jury selection system and its judicial practice through the methods of literature analysis, comparative analysis, normative analysis and so on. The election system of the people's assessor is written to the constitution to speed up the legislative steps of the people's jurors' elective system, to improve the universality and representativeness of the random selection of the jurors, to ensure the civil jurors' procedural and substantive rights, to improve the treatment and subsidies for the people's jurors to participate in the judicial trial, and to promote the citizens to act as the people's company. This thesis is composed of the following parts: the first chapter: introduction. This part mainly includes the research status of the system of selection and appointment of jurors at home and abroad, the purpose of the study, the significance and the significance of the study. The second chapter: the summary of the system of selection and appointment of the people's assessor. This part mainly introduces the concept, contents, principles, characteristics, the nature of the people's assessor and the obstacles of the selection of the people's assessors, and so on. The third chapter introduces the reform of the trial and appointment system of the people's jurors. There are some problems in the course of the reform. It includes: the law has no clear provisions on the obligation of the citizens to serve as the people's assessor, and the number of selected people's jurors has not yet reached five times the number of the judges, and the present conditions of the election are not operational, and the random selection of the jurors is difficult. The management and guarantee mechanism of the people's jurors need to be improved, the citizens lack the understanding of the people's jurors, and the enthusiasm for the selection of the people's assessors needs to be improved. The fourth chapter: the reference of the jury selection system abroad. This part mainly introduces the jury system in several typical countries (the system of reference trial) about the jurors The selected experience and practice, including the origin of the jury system - the jury system in Britain, and the United States and other Anglo American countries, the jury system born in Britain, the development and expansion in the United States, including France, Germany, Japan, Korea and other continental law countries: the status and Practice of the jury selection in the civil law countries, such as France, Germany, Japan, and Korea. To study and compare the legislative experience and judicial practice of the selection of jurors in foreign countries is of great significance for the reform and improvement of the system of the selection and appointment of the people's assessors in China. The fifth chapter, in view of the problems existing in the system of selection and appointment of the people's assessors, and the experience and practice of foreign countries, puts forward some of the system of selection and appointment of the people's assessors in our country. It includes: drafting and formulating the law of the people's assessor, writing the system of selecting and appointing the people's jurors into the constitution, carrying out the selection and random selection of the people's jurors, improving the security mechanism of the people's jurors, improving the enthusiasm of the people's jurors to participate in the judicial trial, and so on, so as to ensure that the citizens can participate in the case in order according to law. The trial of articles promotes judicial democracy, judicial openness and judicial justice. The sixth chapter: epilogue.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：延邊大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D926.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉奎波;公開(kāi)選拔是干部選任制度的革命性變革[J];中國(guó)黨政干部論壇;2001年11期

2 徐燕;;中外法官選任制度比較[J];企業(yè)家天地;2006年01期

3 吳歆;;官員選任制度改革提速[J];黨政論壇(干部文摘);2012年04期

4 付丹妮;中國(guó)古代官吏選任制度評(píng)析及其啟示[J];四川經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

5 黃玉蘭;我國(guó)古代的職官選任制度[J];政府法制;2000年08期

6 王春芳;試論我國(guó)法官選任制度的現(xiàn)狀及其完善[J];河南機(jī)電高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

7 鄧文;略論唐代官員選任制度中的科學(xué)內(nèi)涵[J];江漢論壇;2002年05期

8 張華,王麗;我國(guó)法官選任制度研究[J];金陵法律評(píng)論;2004年02期

9 王曉;任文松;;司法與民主:法官選任制度的民主性表現(xiàn)[J];淮南師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年06期

10 孫建國(guó);;建立民主科學(xué)的干部選任制度[J];實(shí)踐(黨的教育版);2008年02期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前4條

1 王春平;;淺析現(xiàn)行的審判長(zhǎng)選任制度及應(yīng)注意的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[A];黑龍江省法院系統(tǒng)審判體制改革研討會(huì)論文[C];2001年

2 郭曉鋒;苑平;;完善審判長(zhǎng)選任制 深化法官制度改革[A];黑龍江省法院系統(tǒng)審判體制改革研討會(huì)論文[C];2001年

3 步延勝;;關(guān)于推行審判長(zhǎng)選任制后院長(zhǎng)、庭長(zhǎng)監(jiān)督職責(zé)問(wèn)題的探討[A];黑龍江省法院系統(tǒng)審判體制改革研討會(huì)論文[C];2001年

4 呂鐵貞;;中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法制中選任官吏的智慧與借鑒[A];中國(guó)夢(mèng)：道路·精神·力量——上海市社會(huì)科學(xué)界第十一屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)文集（2013年度）[C];2013年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前10條

1 大禹;以改革的思路推動(dòng)干部選任制度創(chuàng)新[N];中國(guó)人事報(bào);2007年

2 孟祥沛;審判長(zhǎng)、獨(dú)任審判員選任制度的改革建議和前景預(yù)測(cè)[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2006年

3 最高人民法院 古水;法官選任制度改革：怎么選，如何任[N];人民法院報(bào);2013年

4 阮世能;法官逐級(jí)選任制度研究[N];人民法院報(bào);2002年

5 記者 沈路濤;各級(jí)法院全面實(shí)行審判長(zhǎng)選任制度[N];新華每日電訊;2000年

6 李會(huì);高法出臺(tái)審判長(zhǎng)選任制[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日?qǐng)?bào);2000年

7 記者 文釗;審判長(zhǎng)實(shí)行選任制[N];中華工商時(shí)報(bào);2000年

8 記者 丁曼麗;審判長(zhǎng)選任制出臺(tái)[N];市場(chǎng)報(bào);2000年

9 施鵬鵬 陳真楠 中國(guó)政法大學(xué)證據(jù)科學(xué)研究院 西南政法大學(xué)司法研究中心;韓國(guó)法官選任制度及啟示[N];人民法院報(bào);2014年

10 本社實(shí)習(xí)記者 張櫻桃;古代基層官員選任制度演變[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2013年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張振國(guó);清代文官選任制度研究[D];南開(kāi)大學(xué);2010年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 鞏媛媛;員額制下的法官選任制度研究[D];安徽大學(xué);2015年

2 楊猛;我國(guó)獨(dú)立董事選任制度研究及完善[D];華東政法大學(xué);2016年

3 岳仕龍;我國(guó)法官額制改革背景下的法官選任制度研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2016年

4 張蒙雨;專業(yè)化視角下法官選任制度研究[D];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院;2016年

5 逄千千;刑事審判中人民陪審員選任制度研究[D];延邊大學(xué);2017年

6 杜永豪;我國(guó)鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)行政機(jī)關(guān)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部選任制度研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2004年

7 劉紅燕;清末、民國(guó)（1912—1927年）官員選任制度的歷史考察[D];河北大學(xué);2002年

8 鄧巨良;論我國(guó)法官選任制度的完善[D];廣東財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2013年

9 李效天;唐代職官選任制度探析[D];西南政法大學(xué);2010年

10 冷雅民;審判長(zhǎng)選任制改革的回顧與反思[D];四川大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：2069967