本文選題：ADR + 交通事故　； 參考：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：機(jī)動(dòng)車作為現(xiàn)代化的交通工具,帶給人們生產(chǎn)、生活高效和便利的同時(shí),也不可避免地帶來(lái)了交通事故以及因其引發(fā)的民事糾紛。ADR作為訴訟之外的糾紛解決方式,以其靈活、便捷、低成本等優(yōu)點(diǎn),為糾紛當(dāng)事人帶來(lái)了弱對(duì)抗性下解決糾紛的人文關(guān)懷,也為交通事故中民事糾紛的高效解決提供了重要契機(jī)。通過(guò)構(gòu)建ADR來(lái)應(yīng)對(duì)日益涌現(xiàn)的交通事故中的民事糾紛將是明智之舉。ADR這一概念的提出雖是在近代的美國(guó),然而實(shí)踐意義上的ADR在我國(guó)自古就有,并且形式多樣,各有所長(zhǎng),遺憾的是理論和立法沒(méi)有明確將其整合起來(lái)形成機(jī)制。我國(guó)已經(jīng)具備發(fā)展ADR的法治土壤,在ADR這一概念引入后,學(xué)界應(yīng)當(dāng)多加關(guān)注,結(jié)合我國(guó)法治現(xiàn)狀,對(duì)ADR進(jìn)行客觀辯證的考察,尤其是對(duì)于訴訟之外,即對(duì)交通事故之民事責(zé)任ADR的研究,以期早日構(gòu)建起高效的交通事故民事責(zé)任多元化糾紛解決機(jī)制。
[Abstract]:As a modern means of transportation, motor vehicles bring people production, life efficiency and convenience, but also inevitably bring traffic accidents and civil disputes caused by them as a means of dispute resolution other than litigation, with its flexibility. The advantages of convenience, low cost and so on, not only bring humanistic care to the parties to the dispute under the weak antagonism, but also provide an important opportunity for the efficient settlement of civil disputes in traffic accidents. It would be wise to construct ADR to deal with civil disputes in traffic accidents. Although the concept of ".ADR" is put forward in modern America, the practical sense of ADR has existed since ancient times in our country, and has various forms and has its own advantages. Unfortunately, theories and legislation do not explicitly integrate them into a mechanism. After the introduction of the concept of ADR, the academic circles should pay more attention to it, combining the current situation of our country's rule of law, to investigate ADR objectively and dialectically, especially outside litigation. That is, the study of ADR of traffic accident civil liability, in order to establish an efficient dispute resolution mechanism of civil liability.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前5條

1 梁慧星;關(guān)于中國(guó)道路交通事故賠償?shù)姆芍贫萚J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1995年06期

2 季衛(wèi)東,易平;調(diào)解制度的法律發(fā)展機(jī)制——從中國(guó)法制化的矛盾入手[J];比較法研究;1999年Z1期

3 趙勇建;;人民調(diào)解制度的功能錯(cuò)位與迷失[J];法制與社會(huì);2006年17期

4 范愉;調(diào)解的重構(gòu)(下)——以法院調(diào)解的改革為重點(diǎn)[J];法制與社會(huì)發(fā)展;2004年03期

5 李理;交通事故社會(huì)救助基金立法的若干問(wèn)題[J];中國(guó)青年政治學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2063926