本文選題：非法集資 + 非法吸收公眾存款��； 參考：《黑龍江大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來，由于非法集資案件涉及情況復雜，實踐中檢察機關在辦理此類案件過程中遇到諸如犯罪性質認定較難把握、收集、固定證據(jù)難、易出現(xiàn)追訴漏犯以及檢察機關如何才能更好地開展審查起訴工作等方面難于把握的法律問題和實踐操作問題。因此，有必要從檢察實務的角度，對我省近年來檢察機關辦理的非法集資案件進行調查研究，以期為我省檢察機關今后處理此類案件提供借鑒。本文第一章對黑龍江省檢察機關辦理非法集資案件的基本情況及主要特點進行了總結和歸納。本文第二章分析了黑龍江省檢察機關辦理非法集資犯罪案件中存在的主要問題。這些問題主要體現(xiàn)在六方面：部分案件對罪與非罪,此罪與彼罪把握存在問題；對單位犯罪中其他直接責任人員范圍把握不準；對中介人是否追訴把握不準；對在非法集資中獲利出局人員的非法所得難以進行追繳；追訴范圍不統(tǒng)一，存在漏犯的可能；非法集資犯罪案件的收集、固定證據(jù)較困難，案件退補率較高。本文第三章從檢察實務中所存在的主要問題出發(fā)，，對辦理非法集資案件提出了相關意見和建議。本章第一節(jié)對非法集資案件的相關法律問題提出適用意見，主要是：應當明確界定“社會不特定對象”，正確把握非法集資的界限；準確區(qū)分非法吸收公眾存款罪與集資詐騙罪；正確把握單位犯罪中具體實施犯罪并起較大作用的人員界定標準；明確追究中介人刑事責任的范疇；區(qū)分情況對于獲利的出局人違法利益進行收繳。為了更好地解決在非法集資案件中追訴范圍不統(tǒng)一、收集、固定證據(jù)較困難，被害人損失難以挽回等問題，本章第二節(jié)就司法實踐操作中應著重把握的問題及完善相關工作機制提出建議，主要是：構建對非法集資案件的證據(jù)收集體系，提高檢察機關辦案質量。要明確非法集資案件所涉各罪的證明要點，構建非法集資犯罪所涉各罪的證據(jù)框架，進一步夯實審查起訴的證據(jù)基礎；正確運用寬嚴相濟刑事政策，實現(xiàn)法律效果和社會效果的有機統(tǒng)一。通過把握寬嚴相濟形勢政策，嚴格區(qū)分罪與非罪、重罪與輕罪、此罪與彼罪，做好對非法集資犯罪分子的分化瓦解；加強部門之間的協(xié)調配合，建立處理非法集資案件聯(lián)動機制。要建立健全與相關行政監(jiān)管部門之間的信息通報制度、與偵查監(jiān)督部門的訴偵監(jiān)督機制、充分利用公訴引導偵查工作機制、建立健全與法院之間的協(xié)商機制，確保辦案的質量和效果；切實保護被害人合法權益，努力促進社會和諧穩(wěn)定。
[Abstract]:In recent years, due to the complexity of cases involving illegal fund-raising, in practice, procuratorial organs have encountered difficulties in handling such cases as determining the nature of the crime, collecting and fixing evidence. It is difficult to grasp the legal and practical problems in prosecution and omission and how the procuratorial organs can better carry out the examination and prosecution work. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate and study the illegal fund-raising cases handled by procuratorial organs in our province in recent years from the point of view of procuratorial practice, in order to provide reference for the procuratorial organs to deal with such cases in the future. The first chapter summarizes the basic situation and main characteristics of the procuratorial organ in Heilongjiang province. The second chapter analyzes the main problems existing in the procuratorial organs of Heilongjiang Province in handling illegal fund-raising crime cases. These problems are mainly reflected in six aspects: some cases of crime and non-crime, this crime and that crime grasp the existing problems; It is difficult to recover the illegal gains of the people who profit out in the illegal fund-raising; the scope of prosecution is not uniform and there is the possibility of omission; the collection of illegal fund-raising crime cases is difficult to collect fixed evidence and the recovery rate of cases is higher. In the third chapter, the author puts forward some opinions and suggestions on handling illegal fund-raising cases from the point of view of the main problems in procuratorial practice. The first section of this chapter puts forward the applicable opinions on the relevant legal issues in the case of illegal fund-raising, mainly as follows: we should clearly define the "social non-specific object" and correctly grasp the limits of illegal fund-raising; Distinguish between the crime of illegally absorbing public deposits and the crime of collecting funds accurately; correctly grasp the defining standard of the personnel who carry out the crime and play a greater role in the crime of unit crime; make clear the scope of investigating the criminal responsibility of the intermediary; Distinguish the situation for the profit of the outout illegal interests of the collection. In order to better solve the problems of the inconsistent scope of prosecution in illegal fund-raising cases, the difficulty of collecting and fixing evidence, and the irreparable loss of victims, The second section of this chapter puts forward some suggestions on the problems that should be grasped in judicial practice and the improvement of relevant working mechanism, mainly as follows: to construct the evidence collection system of illegal fund-raising cases and to improve the quality of handling cases by procuratorial organs. It is necessary to make clear the main points of proof of each crime involved in the case of illegal fund-raising, to construct a framework of evidence for each crime involved in the crime of illegal fund-raising, to further consolidate the evidentiary basis for the examination and prosecution of the crime, and to correctly apply the criminal policy of combining leniency and severity with punishment. Realize the organic unification of legal effect and social effect. By grasping the policy of combining leniency and strict punishment, strictly distinguishing between crimes and crimes, felonies and misdemeanours, and doing a good job in dividing and disintegrating the criminal elements of illegal fund-raising; and strengthening coordination and coordination among the departments. To establish a linkage mechanism for handling illegal fund-raising cases. It is necessary to establish and improve the information notification system with the relevant administrative supervision departments, and the investigation supervision mechanism with the investigation supervision departments, make full use of public prosecution to guide the investigation work mechanism, and establish and improve the consultation mechanism with the courts. Ensure the quality and effect of handling cases, protect the legitimate rights and interests of victims and strive to promote social harmony and stability.
【學位授予單位】：黑龍江大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D924.33;D926.3

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 熊愈;;論如何避免民間借貸淪為非法集資[J];才智;2008年23期

2 秦偉;;民間集資行為的法律規(guī)制與權益分配[J];重慶社會科學;2011年05期

3 王雅彬;;淺析涉眾型金融犯罪適用法律相關問題[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(下旬);2011年06期

4 彭清燕;;論民間金融與非法集資類犯罪[J];法制與社會;2009年30期

5 喬大元;趙璇;;非法集資類犯罪相關罪名辨析[J];法制與社會;2010年28期

6 陳艷;;淺談因經(jīng)濟犯罪引發(fā)群體性事件的防控對策[J];公安學刊(浙江警察學院學報);2010年03期

7 周博文;;我國民間融資視角下的非法集資犯罪研究[J];公安研究;2010年07期

8 曹紅虹;;非法集資案件相關問題[J];中國檢察官;2011年09期

9 岳彩申;袁林;陳蓉;;民間借貸制度創(chuàng)新的思路和要點[J];經(jīng)濟法論叢;2009年01期

10 鄭蓉;朱軍;張凱;;和諧社會背景下的涉眾型經(jīng)濟犯罪防控對策[J];吉林公安高等專科學校學報;2009年06期

本文編號：2059739