發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-06-20 07:17

  本文選題：判例 + 判例制度��； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：自1902年沈家本、伍廷芳主持變法修律以來(lái),中國(guó)法律現(xiàn)代化已迄百年。選擇繼受大陸法系的成文法傳統(tǒng)固然有其原因,但也不無(wú)歷史的偶然。而近一百年來(lái)兩大法系之間的互相融合,也變得越來(lái)越明顯。出于對(duì)原有路徑的依賴,全盤拋棄大陸法系的成文法模式而改為英美法系的判例法傳統(tǒng)已經(jīng)不可能,但是如何在成文法模式下,而對(duì)判例法的合理部分加以吸收,仍是一個(gè)值得思考的問(wèn)題。本文的第一部分系統(tǒng)回顧了英美法系特別是英國(guó)法中,判例制度的起源和隨后的發(fā)展,同時(shí)對(duì)判例制度的具體運(yùn)作進(jìn)行了考察,對(duì)遵循先例的內(nèi)容以及后來(lái)對(duì)其所做的修正做了相關(guān)的介紹。文章的第二部分考察了在大陸法系國(guó)家,判例制度發(fā)展的歷史和當(dāng)今適用的現(xiàn)狀,并比較了兩大法系中判例的不同,而這種不同的哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)則是理性主義和經(jīng)驗(yàn)主義的對(duì)立。文章的第三部分分別考察了中國(guó)古代所存在的判例和清末民初開(kāi)始變法以來(lái),判例制度的進(jìn)一步發(fā)展。隨后,文章討論了1949年特別是1978年以來(lái),在法制建設(shè)中,判例適用的現(xiàn)狀,在文章的結(jié)尾,在比較了判例制度的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)之后,對(duì)借鑒判例制度的必要性和可行性進(jìn)行了初步論證,同時(shí),對(duì)我國(guó)案例指導(dǎo)制度的發(fā)展提出了自己的構(gòu)想,認(rèn)為,司法解釋應(yīng)該從現(xiàn)在的抽象性逐漸向判例化轉(zhuǎn)變,為此,就判例是否應(yīng)具有拘束力提出了自己的意見(jiàn),認(rèn)為應(yīng)該賦予判例以拘束力,同時(shí),從案例匯編的選編開(kāi)始做起,以期逐漸建立我國(guó)的判例解釋制度。
[Abstract]:Since Shen Jiaben and Wu Tingfang presided over the law reform in 1902, the modernization of Chinese law has been a hundred years. There are some reasons for choosing the statutory tradition of civil law system, but it is not without historical fortuitousness. In the last hundred years, the fusion between the two legal systems has become more and more obvious. Out of the dependence on the original path, it is impossible to completely abandon the statutory law model of the continental law system and change it into the case law tradition of the common law system, but how to absorb the reasonable part of the case law under the statutory law mode, It is still a question worth thinking about. The first part of this paper systematically reviews the origin and subsequent development of the case law system in the common law system, especially in the English law system, at the same time, it investigates the concrete operation of the case law system. The contents of following precedents and the amendments made to them are introduced. The second part of the article examines the history of the development of the case law system and the current situation of its application in the countries of continental law system, and compares the differences between the two legal systems, which are based on the antagonism between rationalism and empiricism. The third part of the article examines the case law existing in ancient China and the further development of the precedent system since the beginning of reform in the late Qing Dynasty and the early Republic of China. Then, the article discusses the current situation of the application of jurisprudence in the construction of legal system since 1949, especially since 1978. At the end of the article, after comparing the merits and demerits of the precedent system, The necessity and feasibility of drawing lessons from the precedent system are preliminarily demonstrated. At the same time, the author puts forward his own conception for the development of the case guidance system in China, and holds that the judicial interpretation should gradually change from the abstract to the precedent. The author puts forward his own opinion on whether the case law should have binding force, and holds that it should be given binding force to the case law. At the same time, it begins with the selection and compilation of the case compilation, in order to gradually establish the interpretation system of our country's case law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926;D929

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 蔣潤(rùn)芳;我國(guó)案例指導(dǎo)制度研究[D];蘭州大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：2043448