本文選題：律師協(xié)會 + 行政管理權(quán)　； 參考：《深圳大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國法治化水平不斷提高,社會上發(fā)生的越來越多的糾紛需要通過法律來調(diào)節(jié)。律師行業(yè)也隨著國家法治化發(fā)展而日益壯大,可以說律師行業(yè)的發(fā)展水平在一定程度上反映了一個國家的法治建設(shè)高度。律師協(xié)會也伴隨著律師行業(yè)的發(fā)展而日益完善,迅速成長為我國最具有代表性的行業(yè)協(xié)會。在政府簡政放權(quán)的體制改革背景下,類似于律師協(xié)會之類的行業(yè)協(xié)會越來越多地承接了部分行政機關(guān)的職能。律師協(xié)會作為身兼行業(yè)自律性管理權(quán)和行政權(quán)的行業(yè)協(xié)會,其在行使行政權(quán)的過程中,可能會濫用或者誤用權(quán)力侵犯他人的權(quán)益。因此如何規(guī)制律師協(xié)會的行政權(quán),仍然具有研究價值。尤其是近幾年律師協(xié)會和實習律師之間爭議頻發(fā),實習律師在提起行政訴訟時屢屢碰壁。對律師協(xié)會的權(quán)力性質(zhì)進行界定,具有很強的實踐意義。本文主要內(nèi)容是研究如何規(guī)制律師協(xié)會的行政權(quán),采用規(guī)范分析和實證研究的方法,分析律師協(xié)會在實踐中存在濫用行政權(quán)的問題,并提出完善規(guī)制建議,全文結(jié)構(gòu)如下:第一章是“我國律師協(xié)會權(quán)力的基礎(chǔ)理論”。主要論述我國律師制度的發(fā)展歷程,以了解律師協(xié)會在不同時期所擁有的權(quán)力,進而分析現(xiàn)階段下我國律師協(xié)會的權(quán)力類型。筆者認為,通過分析律師法和律師協(xié)會章程的規(guī)定,律師協(xié)會對實習律師的管理活動是行政權(quán)的體現(xiàn),而不屬于行業(yè)自律性管理的范疇。第二章是“律師協(xié)會行政權(quán)規(guī)制的實踐檢視”。主要論述現(xiàn)階段律師協(xié)會權(quán)力的規(guī)制現(xiàn)狀,并結(jié)合近幾年以律師協(xié)會為被告的行政訴訟案件情況,分析律師協(xié)會在對實習律師管理活動中存在的違法行為,并在此基礎(chǔ)上剖析律師協(xié)會違法行政的原因。第三章是“律師協(xié)會行政權(quán)規(guī)制的完善”。主要論述對律師協(xié)會行政權(quán)規(guī)制的必要性,結(jié)合實踐對如何規(guī)制律師協(xié)會行政權(quán)的運行提出完善建議。筆者認為,通過建立律師協(xié)會會長責任制以及加強司法介入等方式,能有效規(guī)范律師協(xié)會行政權(quán)的行使。
[Abstract]:With the improvement of our country's rule of law, more and more disputes need to be regulated by law. With the development of the rule of law in the country, the development level of the legal profession can be said to reflect the construction of a country's rule of law to a certain extent. Along with the development of the lawyer industry, the Bar Association has become the most representative trade association in China. In the context of the reform of the government decentralization system, trade associations, such as the Bar Association, have more and more taken over the functions of some administrative organs. The Bar Association, as a trade association with both administrative and administrative powers, may abuse or misuse its power to infringe upon the rights and interests of others in the process of exercising the executive power. Therefore, how to regulate the executive power of the Bar Association is still worthy of study. Especially in recent years, disputes between the Bar Association and trainee lawyers are frequent. It is of great practical significance to define the nature of the power of the Bar Association. The main content of this paper is to study how to regulate the executive power of the Bar Association, and to analyze the problem of abusing the executive power in practice by using the methods of normative analysis and empirical research, and to put forward some suggestions to improve the regulation. The structure of the paper is as follows: the first chapter is the basic theory of the power of Chinese Bar Association. This paper mainly discusses the development course of the lawyer system in our country, in order to understand the power that the bar association has in different periods, and then analyze the power type of the bar association in our country at the present stage. The author believes that by analyzing the law of lawyers and the regulations of the bar association, the management of trainee lawyers by the bar association is the embodiment of the administrative power, and does not belong to the category of self-discipline management of the profession. The second chapter is "the practice inspection of the Bar Association's Administrative Power Regulation". This paper mainly discusses the current situation of the power regulation of the Bar Association, and analyzes the illegal behavior of the Bar Association in the management of the trainee lawyers in the light of the situation of the administrative litigation cases in which the Bar Association is the defendant in recent years. On this basis, it analyzes the reasons for the illegal administration of the Bar Association. The third chapter is the perfection of the Bar Association's administrative power regulation. This paper mainly discusses the necessity of regulating the administrative power of the Bar Association, and puts forward some suggestions on how to regulate the operation of the Administrative Power of the Bar Association in combination with practice. The author believes that the exercise of the executive power of the Bar Association can be regulated effectively by establishing the chief responsibility system of the Bar Association and strengthening the judicial intervention.
【學位授予單位】：深圳大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：D926.5

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 朱偉;;律師協(xié)會的權(quán)力及其有效制約[J];蘇州大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2007年04期

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 梁敏燕;社會中介組織及其法律規(guī)制研究[D];吉林大學;2008年

2 朱偉;行政法視野中的律師協(xié)會[D];蘇州大學;2007年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前5條

1 李小軍;我國律師行業(yè)自治法律問題研究[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學;2013年

2 甄臻;行業(yè)協(xié)會法律規(guī)制研究[D];長春理工大學;2012年

3 張超;論行業(yè)協(xié)會的法律規(guī)制[D];中南民族大學;2011年

4 強倩茹;我國非政府組織行政權(quán)力的行使與法律規(guī)制[D];內(nèi)蒙古大學;2010年

5 周嫻;論律師協(xié)會懲戒權(quán)的規(guī)范路徑[D];湘潭大學;2009年

，

本文編號：2038519