本文選題：司法ADR + 法院調(diào)解�。� 參考：《山東大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：ADR是Alternative Dispute Resolution的簡寫,一般翻譯為“替代性糾紛解決方式”,是二十世紀逐步發(fā)展起來的各種訴訟外糾紛解決方式的總稱。自上個世紀七十年代美國將ADR引入到訴訟程序起,ADR就具有了準司法的性質(zhì),從而形成了司法ADR制度。司法ADR具有便于解決糾紛、降低糾紛解決成本、維護社會穩(wěn)定等功能,有利于克服訴訟裁判固有的弊端,有利于構(gòu)建和諧社會,促進社會的可持續(xù)發(fā)展。隨著訴訟需求的急劇上升和訴訟資源不足的矛盾日益突出,越來越多的國家尋求訴訟外解決糾紛,司法ADR以其特有的優(yōu)勢受到無可比擬的青睞。我國的法院調(diào)解制度是我國民事糾紛解決的重要方式,對促進社會的發(fā)展與穩(wěn)定起到了重要作用,但隨著時代的發(fā)展,其弊端愈加明顯,因此對其進行改革是必然的趨勢。司法ADR的迅速發(fā)展及其良好的運行效果極大地沖擊我國的司法理念,無論是理論界還是實務界都開始積極探索多元化糾紛解決方式的建立。因此,我們可以借鑒其他國家司法ADR的理念,重構(gòu)我國的法院調(diào)解制度,使其更有效地化解社會矛盾,促進社會的穩(wěn)定與發(fā)展。 本文首先通過對司法ADR基本問題的研究和比較法考察,分析司法ADR對重構(gòu)我國法院調(diào)解制度的啟示；其次通過分析我國法院法院調(diào)解存在的問題,論述司法ADR與我國法院調(diào)解制度的銜接與融合,最后對重構(gòu)我國法院調(diào)解制度提出具體的構(gòu)想。 第一部分,司法ADR的概述。首先研究司法ADR制度的基礎(chǔ)理論,主要闡述了其定義、性質(zhì)、特征和功能。其次,通過介紹司法ADR在部分國家和地區(qū)的實踐狀況,分析其對重構(gòu)我國法院調(diào)解制度的啟示。 第二部分,司法ADR與我國法院調(diào)解制度的銜接與融合。首先從我國法院調(diào)解存在的問題出發(fā),闡述司法ADR制度是重構(gòu)我國法院調(diào)解的突破口,其次論述司法ADR融入我國法院調(diào)解制度的可能性,最后說明我國引入司法ADR的可行性。 第三部分,我國法院調(diào)解制度的重構(gòu)。針對我國法院調(diào)解存在的問題,借鑒國外的司法ADR,提出重構(gòu)法院調(diào)解制度的具體設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:ADR is the abbreviation of Alternative dispute Resolution, which is generally translated as "alternative dispute Resolution", which is the general term of various non-litigation dispute resolution methods developed gradually in the 20th century. Since the United States introduced ADR into the legal proceedings in the 1970s, ADR has had a quasi-judicial nature, thus forming the judicial ADR system. Judicial ADR has the functions of resolving disputes, reducing the cost of dispute resolution, maintaining social stability, and so on. It is helpful to overcome the inherent malpractice of litigation adjudication, to build a harmonious society and to promote the sustainable development of the society. With the sharp rise of litigation demand and the contradiction of insufficient litigation resources, more and more countries seek to resolve disputes outside litigation. Judicial ADR is favored by unparalleled due to its unique advantages. The court mediation system in our country is an important way to resolve civil disputes, which plays an important role in promoting the development and stability of the society. However, with the development of the times, its drawbacks become more and more obvious, so it is an inevitable trend to reform it. The rapid development of judicial ADR and its good effect greatly impact on the judicial idea of our country. Both theoretical and practical circles have started to actively explore the establishment of diversified dispute resolution. Therefore, we can learn from the concept of judicial ADR in other countries, reconstruct our court mediation system, make it more effective to resolve social contradictions and promote social stability and development. This paper first analyzes the enlightenment of judicial ADR to the reconstruction of our country's court mediation system through the study of the basic problems of judicial ADR and comparative law, and then analyzes the problems existing in the court mediation in our country. This paper discusses the connection and fusion of judicial ADR and the court mediation system of our country, and finally puts forward the concrete conception to reconstruct the court mediation system of our country. The first part is the summary of judicial ADR. First, the basic theory of judicial ADR system is studied, including its definition, nature, features and functions. Secondly, by introducing the practice of judicial ADR in some countries and regions, this paper analyzes the enlightenment of judicial ADR to the reconstruction of our country's court mediation system. The second part, the connection and fusion of judicial ADR and Chinese court mediation system. Starting from the problems existing in the court mediation in our country, this paper expounds that judicial ADR system is a breakthrough in the reconstruction of court mediation in our country, and then discusses the possibility of judicial ADR integrating into the court mediation system in our country, and finally explains the feasibility of introducing judicial ADR into our country. The third part, the reconstruction of our country's court mediation system. In view of the problems existing in the court mediation in our country, this paper puts forward the concrete idea of reconstructing the court mediation system by referring to the foreign judicial ADRs.
【學位授予單位】：山東大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 章武生;司法ADR之研究[J];法學評論;2003年02期

2 肖建國;;司法ADR建構(gòu)中的委托調(diào)解制度研究——以中國法院的當代實踐為中心[J];法學評論;2009年03期

3 克麗斯蒂娜·沃波魯格;替代訴訟的糾紛解決方式(ADR)[J];河北法學;1998年01期

4 李浩;民事審判中的調(diào)審分離[J];法學研究;1996年04期

5 張晉紅;法院調(diào)解的立法價值探究——兼評法院調(diào)解的兩種改良觀點[J];法學研究;1998年05期

6 劉亞玲;;司法ADR與我國法院非訴訟糾紛解決機制的構(gòu)建[J];訴訟法論叢;2005年00期

7 熊先舸;;我國法院委托調(diào)解制度的實施構(gòu)想[J];湖南稅務高等�？茖W校學報;2009年01期

8 賈連杰,陳攀;從美國的ADR看我國訴訟調(diào)解的困境與出路[J];河南省政法管理干部學院學報;2000年01期

9 郭玉軍,甘勇;美國選擇性爭議解決方式(ADR)介評[J];中國法學;2000年05期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 喬欣 王克楠;[N];法制日報;2001年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 尹玉田;司法ADR研究[D];復旦大學;2009年

，

本文編號：2024071