本文選題：刑事再審啟動程序 + 申請再審程序��； 參考：《黑龍江大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：刑事再審啟動程序是刑事再審程序的起點，起著過濾器和分流器的作用，對審判監(jiān)督程序而言具有舉足輕重的地位。然而，由于種種原因，我國在立法上對刑事再審啟動程序的規(guī)定較少，在司法實踐中呈現(xiàn)出許多不足之處，如申訴受理、審查制度不明確、具體；作為刑事再審程序啟動主體的人民法院、人民檢察院啟動職責(zé)不清；刑事再審程序啟動的理由過于籠統(tǒng)、不明確,缺乏可操作性，并且沒有考慮再審啟動理由與再審啟動制度的相互影響和互動等等。上述不足直接導(dǎo)致刑事再審啟動秩序特別混亂，“申訴難”、“濫申訴”、“無限申訴”的現(xiàn)象長期、大量存在，使司法成本大幅上升，嚴重影響司法機關(guān)的公信與權(quán)威。完善刑事再審啟動程序首先要重新確立制定和執(zhí)行刑事再審程序的指導(dǎo)思想，要力求實現(xiàn)法的公平性與法的安定性，，公正與效率等各種價值的平衡、統(tǒng)一。筆者認為完善刑事再審啟動程序的內(nèi)容應(yīng)包括對當事人申訴的次數(shù)與期限進行限制；規(guī)定當事人與近親屬申訴的主次；確定律師在刑事申訴中法律地位及享有的權(quán)利；細化人民法院、人民檢察院啟動再審的權(quán)限及啟動再審的理由；將當事人申訴細化為被告人申請再審和被害人申請抗訴，并且針對被告人申請再審和被害人申請抗訴分別設(shè)立申請再審、申請抗訴程序；加強人民法院、人民檢察院對當事人申訴審查的程序化立法，對當事人申訴的受理方式、審查方式作出全面、明確規(guī)定；進一步對申請再審和申請抗訴的審查處理方式進行拓寬，努力實踐有利于解決矛盾、有利于平衡法律價值沖突的調(diào)解、下達司法建議、刑事和解等處理方式。只有建立一個完善的刑事再審啟動程序，才能充分發(fā)揮其過濾器和分流器功能，使那些與“杜培武、佘祥林、趙作�！币粯拥脑┘馘e案在真兇出前就能啟動再審程序；使那些想謀取與訴訟無關(guān)利益，甚至是非法利益的當事人無處申訴；使那些真正有冤屈的當事人能夠得到及時有效的再審救濟。本文對刑事再審程序啟動機制的現(xiàn)狀及不足進行了實證分析，并在此基礎(chǔ)上就如何完善刑事再審程序啟動機制提出了一些構(gòu)想和建議，以期為構(gòu)建符合我國國情的刑事再審制度提供一點參考。
[Abstract]:The criminal retrial initiation procedure is the starting point of the criminal retrial procedure, which acts as a filter and a shunt, and plays an important role in the trial supervision procedure. However, due to various reasons, our country in the legislation on the criminal retrial start procedure provisions are less, in the judicial practice has shown many deficiencies, such as complaint acceptance, review system is not clear, specific; As the people's court as the subject of the initiation of the criminal retrial procedure, the people's procuratorate has unclear responsibilities for starting the criminal retrial procedure; the reasons for the initiation of the criminal retrial procedure are too general, unclear, and lack of maneuverability. And it does not consider the mutual influence and interaction between retrial start reason and retrial start system. The above deficiencies directly lead to the disorder of the starting order of the criminal retrial, the phenomenon of "difficult appeal", "excessive appeal" and "unlimited appeal" for a long time, which makes the judicial cost rise by a large margin and seriously affects the public trust and authority of the judicial organ. To perfect the procedure of criminal retrial, we must first re-establish the guiding ideology of establishing and executing the procedure of criminal retrial, and strive to achieve the balance and unity of various values, such as fairness of law and stability of law, justice and efficiency, etc. The author thinks that the content of perfecting the criminal retrial initiation procedure should include limiting the number and time limit of the litigant's appeal, prescribing the principal and secondary of the litigant's and near relatives' complaint, determining the lawyer's legal status and the right to enjoy in the criminal appeal. To refine the authority of the people's court and the people's procuratorate to initiate the retrial and the reasons for the retrial; to refine the complaint of the party concerned into the defendant's application for retrial and the victim's application for protest, And for the defendant to apply for retrial and for the victim to apply for protest to set up an application for retrial, to apply for protest procedures; to strengthen the people's court, the people's procuratorate to the procedural legislation for the review of the party's appeal, the way to accept the party's complaint, The mode of examination is comprehensive and clearly stipulated; the examination and handling of the application for retrial and the application for protest are further broadened, and the efforts made in practice are conducive to resolving contradictions, to mediating the conflict of legal value, and to issuing judicial recommendations, Criminal reconciliation, etc. Only by establishing a perfect criminal retrial starting procedure, can the function of filter and shunt be brought into full play, so that those unjust and false cases like "du Peiwu, she Xianglin, Zhao Zuohai" can start the retrial procedure before the true culprits appear. So that those who want to seek interests unrelated to the proceedings, or even illegal interests of the parties nowhere to appeal, so that those who really have grievances can get timely and effective retrial relief. This paper makes an empirical analysis of the current situation and shortcomings of the initiation mechanism of the criminal retrial procedure, and puts forward some ideas and suggestions on how to perfect the starting mechanism of the criminal retrial procedure. In order to build a criminal retrial system in line with the national conditions of our country to provide a little reference.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：黑龍江大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D925.2;D926

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 周世雄;;也論刑事和解制度——以湖南省檢察機關(guān)的刑事和解探索為分析樣本[J];法學(xué)評論;2008年03期

2 江必新;;完善刑事再審程序若干問題探討[J];法學(xué);2011年05期

3 彭建新;;現(xiàn)象與制度之間——司法建議的發(fā)生、價值及制度化[J];法治研究;2011年07期

4 焦悅勤;;大陸法系國家刑事再審理由對中國之借鑒[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報;2009年01期

5 韓陽;刑事再審理由探析[J];法學(xué)研究;2005年03期

6 焦悅勤;;我國刑事再審程序指導(dǎo)思想的反思與修正[J];理論與現(xiàn)代化;2011年01期

7 紅梅;;論我國刑事再審程序的改革與完善[J];前沿;2009年11期

8 陳衛(wèi)東;李奮飛;;刑事再審程序啟動權(quán)質(zhì)疑[J];人大法律評論;2003年00期

9 鄧思清,蔡巍;論我國刑事再審啟動程序的缺陷及其完善[J];人民檢察;2004年09期

10 沈德詠;審判監(jiān)督工作改革若干問題[J];人民司法;2001年08期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 范培根;刑事再審程序之改進與完善[D];中國政法大學(xué);2003年

2 張述元;論刑事審判監(jiān)督二重性及制度創(chuàng)新[D];西南政法大學(xué);2004年

本文編號：2022249