發(fā)布時間：2018-05-31 11:10

  本文選題：民事審判 + 自由裁量權　； 參考：《西南財經大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：法官的自由裁量權問題是一個歷久彌新的話題,這是因為它是司法體制中的關鍵問題,對我國法治的實現起著非常重要的作用。民事審判中法官的自由裁量權是一種客觀上所擁有的權力,它是民事審判權具體使用法律的一種具體表現,在民事審判活動中具有至關重要的作用。在當今世界,無論是以成文法為主體的國家,還是以判例法為主體的國家,法官自由裁量權的客觀存在都是毫無疑問的。自由裁量權的存在是法治與人治之間艱難選擇的一種體現,是成文法自身缺陷的必然結果,它緩和了個別正義與普遍正義之間的沖突、法律漏洞,將紙面上爭議運送到了現實生活當中,同時也維護了法律的價值。 然而,如果法官的自由裁量權毫不受限制,將毫無疑問的導致法官對該自由裁量權的濫用,在我國司法體制尚不健全,法院尚不完全獨立,法官的素質還亟待提高的情況下,法官不當行使自由裁量權的情況時有發(fā)生,隨著司法改革的不斷推進,司法自由裁量權開始逐漸成為全社會關注的焦點。合理規(guī)制法官的自由裁量權,對樹立司法權威、司法公信力,起到了積極的作用。個別案件由于法官的自由裁量權的正當行使達到了良好的社會效果,使最佳的法律效力得以實現。本文從法官的民事司法裁量權的基本情況入手,論述了法官自由裁量權存在的必要性.詳細的分析了中國民事審判中的法官自由裁量權不當行使的表現及其原因,并提出了對民事審判權法官自由裁量權的合理規(guī)制所應當采取的具體措施。希望通過本文的研究,能夠對推動民事審判中法官自由裁量權的合理行使起到一定的借鑒的作用。
[Abstract]:The issue of judges' discretion is a new topic because it is a key issue in the judicial system and plays a very important role in the realization of the rule of law in our country. The discretion of judges in civil trial is an objectively owned power. It is a concrete manifestation of the use of law in civil jurisdiction and plays a vital role in civil trial activities. In today's world, there is no doubt about the objective existence of the discretion of judges, whether in countries with statutory law as the main body or case law as the main body. The existence of discretion is a manifestation of the difficult choice between the rule of law and the rule of man, and the inevitable result of the defects of statute law itself. It alleviates the conflict between individual justice and universal justice, and the legal loopholes. Disputes on paper are transported to real life, while preserving the value of the law. However, if the discretion of the judge is not restricted, it will undoubtedly lead to the abuse of the discretion by the judge. Under the condition that the judicial system is not perfect, the court is not completely independent and the quality of the judge needs to be improved, The improper exercise of discretion by judges occurs from time to time. With the continuous advancement of judicial reform, judicial discretion has gradually become the focus of attention of the whole society. Reasonable regulation of the discretion of judges plays a positive role in establishing judicial authority and judicial credibility. Individual cases have achieved good social effect due to the proper exercise of the judge's discretion, and the best legal effect has been realized. Starting from the basic situation of the judge's civil judicial discretion, this paper discusses the necessity of the existence of the judge's discretion. This paper analyzes in detail the performance and causes of the improper exercise of the judge's discretion in the civil trial in China, and puts forward the concrete measures to be taken for the rational regulation of the judge's discretion in the civil trial. It is hoped that the research in this paper can play a certain reference role in promoting the rational exercise of the judge's discretion in civil trial.
【學位授予單位】：西南財經大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D925.1;D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 萬鄂湘;法官職業(yè)化建設是通往法治的必經途徑[J];法律適用(國家法官學院學報);2002年12期

2 王仙國;;法官民事自由裁量權的規(guī)制[J];法制與經濟(下旬刊);2008年09期

3 賈和平;論法官自由裁量權的價值及其法律規(guī)制[J];甘肅社會科學;2004年03期

4 高雪;;論民事審判中的法官自由裁量權[J];科技信息;2011年19期

5 相慶梅;民事訴訟中的法官自由裁量權及其制約[J];理論探索;2005年04期

6 汪菊;;我國民事訴訟中的法官自由裁量權的限制[J];企業(yè)導報;2010年09期

7 何德成,張曉蓉;論民事審判中自由裁量權的正確行使[J];社會科學研究;1999年04期

8 高琳;;我國民事訴訟中法官自由裁量權的改革[J];運城學院學報;2007年04期

9 湯維建;;人民陪審團制度試點的評析和完善建議[J];政治與法律;2011年03期

10 王宗濤;;論民事司法自由裁量權的規(guī)范化運作[J];中南大學學報(社會科學版);2011年05期

，

本文編號：1959415