本文選題：認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬 + 檢察制度試點(diǎn)改革�。� 參考：《東方法學(xué)》2017年06期

【摘要】：刑事案件認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度包含實(shí)體上"從輕"和程序上"從快"兩方面含義,既存在于刑法適用定罪量刑過(guò)程中,同時(shí)也存在于刑事訴訟不同程序以及程序的不同階段。黨的十八屆四中全會(huì)通過(guò)的《中共中央關(guān)于全面推進(jìn)依法治國(guó)若干重大問(wèn)題的決定》中對(duì)認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度的要求是"完善",而非"建立",這要求落實(shí)制度時(shí)要統(tǒng)籌協(xié)調(diào)與之相關(guān)的制度和程序,發(fā)掘這一制度的內(nèi)在潛力,并補(bǔ)充部分內(nèi)容使之系統(tǒng)化,并與現(xiàn)有法律規(guī)定對(duì)接。在實(shí)踐中,應(yīng)當(dāng)明確參與主體、擴(kuò)展案件適用范圍、確定從寬方式和量刑建議,并在一定程度上補(bǔ)充救濟(jì)途徑。認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度的主要目的既包括提高效率、優(yōu)化司法資源,也包括個(gè)別預(yù)防、促進(jìn)公正。在運(yùn)行時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)加強(qiáng)監(jiān)督審查,避免司法人員獨(dú)斷專行和腐敗;充分發(fā)揮程序的效率價(jià)值,實(shí)現(xiàn)案件繁簡(jiǎn)分流;保障最低限度的公正,避免損害當(dāng)事人合法權(quán)益。同時(shí),在探索與推行認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度時(shí),應(yīng)當(dāng)兼顧程序正義和訴訟經(jīng)濟(jì)兩方面目標(biāo),力爭(zhēng)實(shí)現(xiàn)辦案的法律效果和社會(huì)效果的有機(jī)統(tǒng)一。
[Abstract]:The lenient system of pleading guilty and penalizing in criminal cases includes two meanings: "lighter" in substance and "quick" in procedure, which exists in the process of conviction and sentencing in criminal law, but also in different procedures and stages of criminal procedure. In the "decision of the CPC Central Committee on comprehensively promoting the Rule of Law on several important issues" adopted by the fourth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee, the requirement for the lenient system of guilty pleading and penalizing is "perfect" rather than "establishing", which requires the implementation of the system. To coordinate the relevant systems and procedures, Explore the inherent potential of this system, and add part of the content to systematize it, and with the existing legal provisions. In practice, we should clearly participate in the subject, expand the scope of application of the case, determine the lenient way and sentencing suggestion, and supplement the relief way to a certain extent. The main purposes of the leniency system include improving efficiency, optimizing judicial resources, including individual prevention and promoting justice. In operation, we should strengthen supervision and examination to avoid arbitrariness and corruption of judicial personnel, give full play to the efficiency value of procedure, realize complicated and simple cases, guarantee minimum justice and avoid harming the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned. At the same time, in exploring and implementing the lenient system of pleading guilty and penalizing punishment, we should take into account the goals of procedural justice and litigation economy, and strive to realize the organic unity of the legal effect and social effect of handling cases.
【作者單位】： 上海市人民檢察院研究室;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D925.2;D926.3

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魏愛(ài)軍;王帥;;刑事案件犯罪嫌疑人、被告人自報(bào)身份情況調(diào)研[J];法制與社會(huì);2008年31期

2 郭浩善;論少年刑事案件審判中的觀念轉(zhuǎn)變[J];青少年犯罪問(wèn)題;1997年04期

3 曹勇;刑事案件公開(kāi)審判中的幾點(diǎn)注意事項(xiàng)[J];法律適用;1999年04期

4 ;中華全國(guó)律師協(xié)會(huì)關(guān)于律師辦理刑事案件的十項(xiàng)要求[J];中國(guó)律師;1999年07期

5 肖祖瀚;;報(bào)復(fù)社會(huì)嚴(yán)重刑事案件激增的四大主因[J];中國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)周刊;2013年49期

6 李立;論刑事案件中犯罪嫌疑人、被告人死亡的處理[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年03期

7 楊大民;合情合理不合法，

本文編號(hào)：1950938