本文選題：公眾情感 + 形式合理性��； 參考：《武漢理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版)》2013年01期

【摘要】：刑事司法裁判的作出并非是一個(gè)完全依照刑事司法規(guī)范進(jìn)行純粹理性的、邏輯推理的過(guò)程,公眾情感的合理融入會(huì)使裁判結(jié)果在合法的基礎(chǔ)上更加合情、合理。法官情感與公眾情感的對(duì)接,法律形式合理性與實(shí)質(zhì)合理性的統(tǒng)一,刑事判決的法律效果與社會(huì)效果的統(tǒng)一,都需要刑事判決納入公眾情感的考量。具體到操作層面就需要法官在刑事司法過(guò)程中,在司法為民理念的指導(dǎo)下,進(jìn)行人本主義解釋,給予公眾情感以合理關(guān)照,協(xié)調(diào)法與情的二元關(guān)系。同時(shí),在制度上也要進(jìn)行積極的創(chuàng)新與改革,如人民陪審團(tuán)制度。
[Abstract]:The decision of criminal justice is not a purely rational and logical process according to the norms of criminal justice. The reasonable integration of public emotion will make the judgment result more reasonable and reasonable on the basis of legality. The connection between judge's emotion and public emotion, the unification of legal form rationality and substantive rationality, and the unification of legal effect and social effect of criminal judgment need to be taken into consideration by public emotion. In the process of criminal justice, under the guidance of the concept of judicature for the people, the judge should explain humanism, give public emotion reasonable attention, and coordinate the dual relationship between law and emotion. At the same time, the system should also carry out positive innovation and reform, such as the people's jury system.
【作者單位】： 西南政法大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：西南政法大學(xué)研究生科研創(chuàng)新計(jì)劃重點(diǎn)項(xiàng)目(2011XZYJS010)
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【共引文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫洪坤;沉默權(quán)的代價(jià)[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年04期

2 林婷;權(quán)威與秩序——對(duì)于中間組織缺失與整合之研究[J];安徽師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(人文社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年01期

3 張，

本文編號(hào)：1943408