發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-15 19:23

  本文選題：區(qū)際 + 司法協(xié)助��； 參考：《蘭州大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著港澳的回歸和“一國兩制”方針的貫徹實(shí)施,中國逐漸演變成了一個(gè)多法域的國家。與之相應(yīng),區(qū)際司法協(xié)助問題也就提上了議事日程。 澳門回歸后,兩地間的經(jīng)貿(mào)和民間交往不斷發(fā)展,涉及兩地的民商事訴訟和相關(guān)法律事務(wù)也有所增多,這就要求兩地加強(qiáng)民商事區(qū)際司法協(xié)助。本文通過對(duì)內(nèi)地和澳門的民商事司法協(xié)助的研究,希望能夠?yàn)閮傻丶訌?qiáng)民商事司法協(xié)助提供參考。 本文由導(dǎo)論、正文和結(jié)論三部分組成,正文分為四章,主要內(nèi)容依次為： 第一章概述中國內(nèi)地和澳門民商事區(qū)際司法協(xié)助。首先對(duì)區(qū)際司法協(xié)助的內(nèi)涵和外延進(jìn)行了初步的理論說明,然后對(duì)我國內(nèi)地和澳門民商事區(qū)際司法協(xié)助進(jìn)行概要闡述。 第二章介紹了中國內(nèi)地和澳門民商事司法協(xié)助的法律依據(jù)和現(xiàn)狀。分別從憲法性法律、區(qū)域民商事司法協(xié)助協(xié)議、中國內(nèi)地和澳門的本地法律來解釋中國內(nèi)地和澳門民商事司法協(xié)助的法律依據(jù),然后進(jìn)一步說明在這些法律依據(jù)之下的兩地民商事司法協(xié)助的現(xiàn)狀。 第三章是內(nèi)地和澳門民商事司法協(xié)助面臨的主要問題及其原因。由于中國內(nèi)地和澳門在社會(huì)制度、司法體制、法律文化傳統(tǒng)等方面的差異非常明顯,所以兩地在民商事司法協(xié)助方面面臨很多困難和阻礙。本部分通過對(duì)存在的主要問題進(jìn)行分析,找出其存在的原因。 第四章是完善中國內(nèi)地和澳門民商事區(qū)際司法協(xié)助的設(shè)想。這是針對(duì)兩地在民商事司法協(xié)助面臨的主要問題提出的解決方案,就完善兩地民商事司法協(xié)助應(yīng)該堅(jiān)持的原則,如何具體完善兩地現(xiàn)有區(qū)際司法協(xié)助內(nèi)容等提出設(shè)想。
[Abstract]:With the return of Hong Kong and Macao and the implementation of the principle of "one country, two systems", China has gradually evolved into a multi-jurisdiction country. Accordingly, the issue of regional mutual legal assistance has been put on the agenda. After Macao's return to China, the economic and trade and folk exchanges between the two places have been developing continuously, and the number of civil and commercial litigation and related legal affairs has also increased, which requires the two places to strengthen judicial assistance between the two regions. Through the research on the judicial assistance in civil and commercial affairs in the mainland and Macao, this paper hopes to provide a reference for strengthening judicial assistance in civil and commercial matters. This paper consists of three parts: introduction, text and conclusion. The text is divided into four chapters. The main contents are as follows: The first chapter summarizes the inter-regional judicial assistance between the mainland of China and Macao. At first, the connotation and extension of inter-regional judicial assistance are explained in theory, and then the interregional judicial assistance in civil and commercial affairs of mainland China and Macao is briefly expounded. The second chapter introduces the legal basis and present situation of judicial assistance in civil and commercial affairs in mainland China and Macao. To explain the legal basis for mutual legal assistance in civil and commercial matters in the mainland of China and Macao in terms of constitutional law, regional agreements on mutual legal assistance in civil and commercial matters, and local laws in the mainland of China and Macao, respectively. Then it further explains the current situation of mutual legal assistance in civil and commercial affairs under these legal bases. The third chapter is the main problems and reasons of the civil and commercial judicial assistance in the mainland and Macao. Because the differences between mainland China and Macao in social system, judicial system, legal cultural tradition and so on are very obvious, the two places face a lot of difficulties and obstacles in civil and commercial judicial assistance. In this part, the main problems are analyzed to find out the reasons for their existence. The fourth chapter is to improve the mainland of China and Macao inter-regional judicial assistance. This is a solution to the major problems faced by judicial assistance in civil and commercial affairs in both places. It also puts forward some ideas on how to perfect the principles of mutual legal assistance in civil and commercial matters and how to improve the contents of mutual legal assistance between the two regions.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926;D618;D927

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張憲初;菲利普·斯馬特;;萬事開頭難——《內(nèi)地香港相互認(rèn)可和執(zhí)行當(dāng)事人協(xié)議管轄的民商事案件判決的安排》評(píng)析[J];北大法律評(píng)論;2007年02期

2 李廣輝;論內(nèi)地與澳門特區(qū)民商事區(qū)際司法協(xié)助[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年03期

3 蔡博;林小娟;;以法律方法構(gòu)建CEPA經(jīng)貿(mào)爭端解決機(jī)制之可行性研究[J];湖南社會(huì)科學(xué);2007年06期

4 趙鋼,劉學(xué)在;關(guān)于修訂《民事訴訟法》的幾個(gè)基本問題[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2004年02期

5 何其生;域外電子送達(dá)第一案及其思考[J];法學(xué);2005年03期

6 張憲初;;對(duì)《內(nèi)地香港相互認(rèn)可和執(zhí)行當(dāng)事人協(xié)議管轄的民商事案件判決的安排》的初步評(píng)價(jià)[J];法治論壇;2007年04期

7 王小紅;楊宏;;中國內(nèi)地與港澳間民商事判決承認(rèn)與執(zhí)行模式芻議[J];廣州市經(jīng)濟(jì)管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

8 何智慧;對(duì)中國區(qū)際司法協(xié)助模式的再認(rèn)識(shí)[J];河北法學(xué);2001年05期

9 趙國強(qiáng);論中國內(nèi)地與澳門特別行政區(qū)開展區(qū)際司法協(xié)助的模式[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年03期

10 顧敏康,徐永康,林來梵;香港司法文化的過去、現(xiàn)在與未來——兼與內(nèi)地司法文化比較[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年06期

，

本文編號(hào)：1893597