發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-05-14 15:01

  本文選題：陜甘寧邊區(qū) + 司法　； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：革命用最為強(qiáng)大的話語方式展現(xiàn)其生命邏輯,革命在場(chǎng)意味著社會(huì)結(jié)構(gòu)的重新定義,意味著權(quán)力格局的變更,意味著文化和心理的斷裂與整合。而法律正是以其明顯的工具意義和強(qiáng)烈的價(jià)值期待維護(hù)和塑造革命所改造的社會(huì)關(guān)系。如何調(diào)處法律與革命之間的互動(dòng)與張力,如何在革命語境下建構(gòu)契合革命價(jià)值訴求的法律制度,這是革命者必須面對(duì)的時(shí)代命題。抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)時(shí)期的陜甘寧邊區(qū),“一方面,革命要求突破法律,要求在思想和行動(dòng)上鏟除一切舊法律的思想;另一方面,革命也需要法制建設(shè),要求建立新的法律制度�！�1在管理和戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)并行的革命時(shí)期,如何處理公共權(quán)力運(yùn)行以及法律建構(gòu)與社會(huì)革命之間的關(guān)系,是抗戰(zhàn)時(shí)期共產(chǎn)黨人必須正視的問題。中國共產(chǎn)黨在陜甘寧邊區(qū)的社會(huì)和政治建構(gòu)彰顯其強(qiáng)烈的現(xiàn)代欲求,但當(dāng)時(shí)邊區(qū)經(jīng)濟(jì)凋敝,文化匱乏,封建陋習(xí)保存較為完整。在這樣的現(xiàn)實(shí)狀況下,共產(chǎn)黨人進(jìn)行革命動(dòng)員,讓革命義理為群眾所接受,特別是通過法律機(jī)制來促助政治革命和社會(huì)革命的完成便異常重要而艱難。在這個(gè)特殊的歷史時(shí)期,時(shí)代主題和歷史任務(wù)使司法改革必須以溝通國家和社會(huì)為重心。因此,司法走出了一條具有邊區(qū)特色的人民司法的道路,司法機(jī)關(guān)在功能和邏輯上都發(fā)生了歷史性的轉(zhuǎn)化,越出了自己的領(lǐng)域而觸及到政治經(jīng)濟(jì),成為黨治理社會(huì)的工具。但司法話語與政治革命和社會(huì)改革之間形成良性互動(dòng)并非一蹴而就,而是經(jīng)歷了一個(gè)沖突與推進(jìn)共存的過程。邊區(qū)司法改革在經(jīng)歷了以雷驚天為代表的強(qiáng)調(diào)法律政治性和階級(jí)性的蘇俄式法律路徑和以李木庵為代表的強(qiáng)調(diào)法律職業(yè)化和超階級(jí)性的西方式法律路徑的失敗后,最終以馬克思主義法律思想為理論指導(dǎo),從中國革命實(shí)際情況出發(fā),形成了契合中國邊區(qū)實(shí)際的法律思想和法律實(shí)踐,從而在理論和實(shí)踐中創(chuàng)造性地實(shí)現(xiàn)了馬克思法律思想中國化。 文章由前言、正文和結(jié)語三個(gè)部分構(gòu)成,其中正文又分為四個(gè)主體部分。 前言主要闡述本文的選題目的、研究綜述、選題意義、研究重點(diǎn)及創(chuàng)新之處。 正文從四個(gè)部分詳盡闡述了陜甘寧邊區(qū)司法改革的整個(gè)歷程,其中主要以“陜甘寧邊區(qū)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人如何利用司法體制來溝通國家和社會(huì),以實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)改造”為問題切入點(diǎn),緊扣問題梳理了抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)時(shí)期陜甘寧邊區(qū)高等法院的四次司法改革。 結(jié)語部分將進(jìn)一步闡釋陜甘寧邊區(qū)司法改革經(jīng)過艱辛探索而最終形成的人民司法是馬克思主義法律思想中國化的體現(xiàn),同時(shí)探尋在邊區(qū)司法改革過程中所揭示的問題對(duì)當(dāng)今司法改革的啟示意義。
[Abstract]:Revolution expresses its life logic in the most powerful way of discourse. The presence of revolution means the redefinition of social structure, the change of power structure, the rupture and integration of culture and psychology. Law, with its obvious instrumental significance and strong value, is expected to maintain and shape the social relations reformed by the revolution. How to adjust the interaction and tension between law and revolution, and how to construct a legal system in the context of revolution, which accords with the demands of revolutionary value, is an epochal proposition that revolutionaries must face. In the Shensi-Kansu-Ningsia Border region during the War of Resistance against Japan, "on the one hand, the revolution requires breaking through the law and the idea of eliminating all the old laws in thought and action; on the other hand, the revolution also requires the building of a legal system." In the revolutionary period of concurrent management and war, how to deal with the relationship between the operation of public power and the legal construction and the social revolution is the problem that Communists must face up to during the War of Resistance against Japan. The social and political construction of the Communist Party of China in the Shensi-Kansu-Ningsia Border region showed its strong modern desire, but at that time, the economy of the border area was depressed, the culture was scarce, and the feudal bad habits were relatively intact. In such a realistic situation, it is extremely important and difficult for the Communists to carry out revolutionary mobilization to make revolutionary justice acceptable to the masses, especially to promote the completion of political and social revolution through legal mechanisms. In this special historical period, the theme of the times and historical tasks make the judicial reform must focus on the communication between the country and the society. Therefore, the judicature has made a way of people's judicature with the characteristics of the border area, and the judicial organ has undergone a historic transformation in function and logic, and has gone beyond its own field to touch the political economy and become a tool for the party to govern the society. However, the positive interaction between judicial discourse, political revolution and social reform is not accomplished overnight, but has gone through a process of conflict and promotion. The judicial reform in the border area has experienced the failure of the Russian-style legal path, which emphasizes the political and class nature of the law, and the western way of legal professionalization and super-class, which is represented by Li Mu-an. Finally, under the guidance of Marxist legal thought, and proceeding from the actual situation of the Chinese revolution, the law thought and legal practice were formed in line with the actual situation in the Chinese border region. Thus it creatively realizes the localization of Marx's legal thought in theory and practice. The article consists of three parts: preface, text and conclusion, in which the text is divided into four main parts. The preface mainly expounds the purpose, research summary, significance, research emphasis and innovation of this paper. The text elaborates the whole course of the judicial reform in the Shaanxi-Gansu-Ningxia Border region from four parts in detail, in which "how the leaders of the Shensi-Kansu-Ningxia Border region use the judicial system to communicate the country and society and realize the social transformation" is the breakthrough point. Clinging to the problems, it combed the four judicial reforms of the Supreme Court of Shaanxi, Gansu and Ningxia during the War of Resistance against Japan. The conclusion part will further explain that the people's judicature formed by the judicial reform in the Shensi-Kansu-Ningsia Border region is the embodiment of the Sinicization of Marxist legal thought. At the same time, it explores the enlightening significance of the problems revealed in the process of judicial reform in the border region.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 何正付,韋杰廷;謝覺哉法制思想概述[J];安徽廣播電視大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年03期

2 季衛(wèi)東;程序比較論[J];比較法研究;1993年01期

3 楊永華 ,方克勤;陜甘寧邊區(qū)調(diào)解原則的形成[J];西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1984年01期

4 楊永華 ,方克勤;抗日戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)時(shí)期陜甘寧邊區(qū)司法工作中貫徹統(tǒng)一戰(zhàn)線政策的幾個(gè)問題[J];西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1984年04期

5 楊永華;延安時(shí)代的法制理論與實(shí)踐[J];西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1986年03期

6 汪世榮;劉全娥;;陜甘寧邊區(qū)高等法院編制判例的實(shí)踐與經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年04期

7 顧敏康;;引入判例法,促進(jìn)司法改革[J];法學(xué)家;2004年04期

8 孫笑俠,應(yīng)永宏;論法官與政治家思維的區(qū)別[J];法學(xué);2001年09期

9 周永坤;;我們需要什么樣的司法民主[J];法學(xué);2009年02期

10 陳洪杰;;方向性錯(cuò)誤:司法改革的圍城之惑[J];華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2009年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張煒達(dá);陜甘寧邊區(qū)法制創(chuàng)新研究[D];西北大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：1888370