本文選題：知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu) + 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法庭　； 參考：《華中科技大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)在21世紀(jì)迅猛發(fā)展，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)作為促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展，激勵(lì)科技創(chuàng)新的核心引擎，越來(lái)越為各方所重視。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度已經(jīng)成為世界各個(gè)國(guó)家和地區(qū)不可或缺的制度。近年來(lái)我國(guó)涉及知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的訴訟案件數(shù)量持續(xù)快速增長(zhǎng)。總的來(lái)說(shuō)，我國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護(hù)制度有了一定發(fā)展，但相比世界發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家和地區(qū)，仍處于初始階段。構(gòu)建完善的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度對(duì)促進(jìn)科技進(jìn)步和經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展具有重要的作用�，F(xiàn)在一些國(guó)家在國(guó)內(nèi)和國(guó)際上加大知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)力度、強(qiáng)化知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略地位，其基本目的亦不外乎希求以知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)為武器，實(shí)現(xiàn)和維護(hù)本國(guó)在國(guó)際市場(chǎng)的競(jìng)爭(zhēng)優(yōu)勢(shì)和技術(shù)優(yōu)勢(shì)。作為知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護(hù)中的重要部分，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu)是審理知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案件的司法機(jī)構(gòu)，包括相關(guān)的司法資源設(shè)置。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu)的優(yōu)化，關(guān)系著本國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的保護(hù)范圍、保護(hù)水平以及保護(hù)機(jī)制，更是影響到知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的發(fā)展，科技水平的進(jìn)步，甚至綜合國(guó)力的強(qiáng)盛。 我國(guó)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護(hù)制度一直處于完善和發(fā)展過(guò)程中。知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu)仍然存在著一些問(wèn)題，如知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu)設(shè)置不規(guī)范，知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案件審判隊(duì)伍的規(guī)范化程度不高。我國(guó)一直在實(shí)施知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)戰(zhàn)略，目前進(jìn)入了深化實(shí)施階段，要充分完善知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)制，將司法解釋和司法政策進(jìn)一步充實(shí)完善，更好地實(shí)行司法保護(hù)，這都對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu)的設(shè)置和優(yōu)化提出了更高的要求。 知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu)作為保護(hù)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的審判機(jī)構(gòu)，其根本目的是為了合法高效的審理知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)案件，維護(hù)知識(shí)成果，促進(jìn)科技創(chuàng)新，打擊知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)違法行為，保護(hù)當(dāng)事人的合法權(quán)益，維護(hù)知識(shí)經(jīng)濟(jì)的良好發(fā)展環(huán)境。本文從兩個(gè)層面著眼，一是從我國(guó)歷史發(fā)展角度對(duì)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu)進(jìn)行了概述，另外一方面，對(duì)世界先進(jìn)國(guó)家和地區(qū)的知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu)進(jìn)行比較分析，借鑒了發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)制度的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)。同時(shí)，分析了我國(guó)當(dāng)前知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判制度現(xiàn)狀和我國(guó)目前知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判制度依然存在各種問(wèn)題。本文最后借鑒了國(guó)外的先進(jìn)制度，結(jié)合現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)沿用了國(guó)內(nèi)建立知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法院的構(gòu)想，提出知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判機(jī)構(gòu)的具體優(yōu)化措施為，建立知識(shí)法庭，提高識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判隊(duì)伍綜合素質(zhì)，完善人民陪審員制度，，引入技術(shù)審查官等有效措施。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of knowledge economy in the 21st century, intellectual property rights, as the core engine to promote economic development and stimulate scientific and technological innovation, have attracted more and more attention. Intellectual property protection system has become an indispensable system in all countries and regions of the world. In recent years, the number of litigation cases involving intellectual property rights in China has been increasing rapidly. Generally speaking, the judicial protection system of intellectual property in China has developed to some extent, but it is still in its initial stage compared with developed countries and regions in the world. The establishment of a sound intellectual property protection system plays an important role in promoting scientific and technological progress and economic development. At present, some countries have stepped up the protection of intellectual property rights at home and abroad and strengthened the strategic position of intellectual property rights. Their basic purpose is also to seek intellectual property rights as a weapon. To realize and maintain the competitive and technical advantages of our country in the international market. As an important part of the judicial protection of intellectual property, the intellectual property judicial institution is the judicial institution that hears intellectual property cases, including the relevant judicial resources. The optimization of intellectual property judicial institutions is related to the scope, level and mechanism of intellectual property protection in our country. It also affects the development of intellectual property rights, the progress of science and technology, and even the strength of comprehensive national strength. Our country's intellectual property right judicial protection system has been in the perfect and the development process. There are still some problems in the intellectual property judicial organization, such as the non-standard setting of the intellectual property trial institution and the low standardization degree of the intellectual property trial team. Our country has been implementing the strategy of intellectual property. At present, we have entered the stage of deepening the implementation. We should fully improve the mechanism of intellectual property trial, further enrich and perfect the judicial interpretation and judicial policy, and better implement judicial protection. This has put forward higher requirements for the setting and optimization of intellectual property judicial institutions. The fundamental purpose of the intellectual property judicial organ as a judicial organ for the protection of intellectual property rights is to deal with intellectual property cases legally and efficiently, to safeguard the achievements of knowledge, to promote scientific and technological innovation, and to crack down on illegal acts of intellectual property, Protect the legitimate rights and interests of the parties and maintain a good environment for the development of knowledge economy. This paper focuses on two aspects. One is an overview of intellectual property judicial institutions from the perspective of China's historical development, and the other is a comparative analysis of intellectual property judicial institutions in advanced countries and regions in the world. It draws lessons from the advanced experience of intellectual property protection system in developed countries. At the same time, it analyzes the current situation of intellectual property trial system in China and the existing problems in our current intellectual property trial system. In the end, this paper draws lessons from the advanced systems of foreign countries, adopts the conception of establishing intellectual property courts in China in combination with the practical basis, and puts forward the specific optimization measures for intellectual property judicial institutions: establishing knowledge courts. To improve the comprehensive quality of the judge team of property rights, to perfect the system of people's jurors and to introduce technical examiners and other effective measures.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華中科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D923.4

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 梅術(shù)文;曹新明;;日本知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法院的設(shè)置及其啟示[J];電子知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);2005年12期

2 徐家力;;我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護(hù)目前存在的問(wèn)題及對(duì)策[J];法律適用;2006年03期

3 陳惠珍;徐俊;;論我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)立體審判模式的構(gòu)建[J];法律適用;2006年04期

4 孫海龍;董倚銘;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判中的民刑沖突及其解決 以構(gòu)建協(xié)調(diào)的訴訟程序和專業(yè)審判組織為目標(biāo)[J];法律適用;2008年03期

5 張玉敏;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)法制三十年[J];法學(xué)雜志;2009年02期

6 郭壽康;李劍;;我國(guó)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判組織專門化問(wèn)題研究——以德國(guó)聯(lián)邦專利法院為視角[J];法學(xué)家;2008年03期

7 張德淼,周佑勇;論當(dāng)前我國(guó)實(shí)現(xiàn)司法正義的條件和途徑[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;1999年01期

8 邱文寬;加強(qiáng)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)審判應(yīng)優(yōu)先解決的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題[J];廣東科技;1999年05期

9 雷蒙德·尼柯?tīng)?李藝;鄭厚俊;;澳大利亞知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)簡(jiǎn)介及對(duì)高校知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)的影響[J];法制與社會(huì);2010年19期

10 鐘莉;劉建新;王俊毅;;知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)司法保護(hù)與行政執(zhí)法銜接策略研究——兼論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)“三審合一”審判機(jī)制[J];科技與法律;2009年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 曹三明 陳海光;[N];人民法院報(bào);2001年

本文編號(hào)：1888087