發(fā)布時間：2018-05-14 03:04

  本文選題：權(quán)力 + 司法權(quán)��； 參考：《太原科技大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：權(quán)力必須受到監(jiān)督與制約是任何一個奉行民主政治的國家權(quán)力運作的基本規(guī)則,不受監(jiān)督與制約的權(quán)力必然導(dǎo)致腐敗。司法權(quán)屬于權(quán)力,具有權(quán)力的屬性特征,所以司法權(quán)也必須受到監(jiān)督與制約。只有將司法權(quán)力置于一個有效的機(jī)制下,才能正常合理的運作,才不至于使掌握并行使司法權(quán)力的人濫用權(quán)力。絕對的權(quán)力必然導(dǎo)致絕對的腐敗。因此,對司法權(quán)力必須進(jìn)行監(jiān)督與制約,凡是不受監(jiān)督與制約的權(quán)力,必定會被濫用而導(dǎo)致司法的專橫與腐敗。歷史的經(jīng)驗值得注意,雖然我們的司法改革取得了一定的成績,但是由于對司法權(quán)力的監(jiān)督與制約無力,司法腐敗現(xiàn)象不能得到有效的遏制。由于對司法權(quán)的監(jiān)督與制約不力,司法腐敗現(xiàn)象才會如此猖獗,司法權(quán)濫用的現(xiàn)象才會被掌權(quán)者用的那樣的冠冕堂皇�？傊�,對司法權(quán)力的監(jiān)督與制約勢在必行,社會愈發(fā)展愈現(xiàn)代化,法治化,這種要求愈強(qiáng)烈。而如何更有效地對司法權(quán)進(jìn)行監(jiān)督與制約,尤其是我國目前處于轉(zhuǎn)型時期,所以如何使司法權(quán)公平、公正的運行,達(dá)到減少腐敗和遏制腐敗的目的,將需要我們以全新的視角,更加深層次地來研究如何對司法權(quán)進(jìn)行監(jiān)督與制約。 本文第一章闡述了司法權(quán)監(jiān)督與制約的相關(guān)理論。首先,筆者結(jié)合我國國情及司法實踐,同時為了本課題研究的需要將司法權(quán)界定為“三權(quán)說”即審判權(quán)、檢察權(quán)和偵查權(quán),并對司法權(quán)的權(quán)力屬性進(jìn)行了分析;其次,通過對司法權(quán)監(jiān)督與制約的內(nèi)涵及監(jiān)督與制約不力的后果進(jìn)行分析,指出司法權(quán)監(jiān)督與制約的必要性;最后,筆者對司法權(quán)監(jiān)督與制約的理論基礎(chǔ)和國外的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗進(jìn)行了歸納整理,為我國司法權(quán)監(jiān)督與制約機(jī)制的改革和完善提供了理論指導(dǎo)。本文第二章對我國司法權(quán)監(jiān)督與制約的現(xiàn)狀及存在問題進(jìn)行了分析,我國的司法腐敗有愈演愈烈之勢,司法權(quán)的運行缺乏必要、合理、有效的監(jiān)督與制約。目前黨和政府的權(quán)力過于擴(kuò)張;人大監(jiān)督體制流于形式;私權(quán)利自身尚不能形成一股有效的監(jiān)督與制約的力量;“程序正義”的觀念有待普及,法律程序制定粗陋,無法形成對司法權(quán)的有效制約;新聞法制定滯后,媒體監(jiān)督依據(jù)不足;司法職業(yè)群體未完全形成,司法官員職業(yè)素養(yǎng)不高,無法通過自律方式保證司法權(quán)的正當(dāng)運行。本文第三章為保證司法權(quán)監(jiān)督與制約的科學(xué)性與有效性,筆者大膽提出構(gòu)建“我國特色之五大司法權(quán)監(jiān)督與制約體系”,即權(quán)力監(jiān)督與制約體系、權(quán)利監(jiān)督與制約體系、程序監(jiān)督與制約體系、輿論監(jiān)督與制約體系和道德監(jiān)督與制約體系。在五大監(jiān)督與制約體系下,司法權(quán)將受到全面、合理、高效、科學(xué)的監(jiān)督與制約,使司法權(quán)能公開、公平、公正的運行,從而實現(xiàn)司法正義。
[Abstract]:The power must be supervised and restricted is the basic rule of the power operation of any country that pursues democratic politics, and the power not subject to supervision and restriction will inevitably lead to corruption. The judicial power belongs to the power, has the power attribute characteristic, therefore the judicial power must also be supervised and restricted. Only by putting the judicial power under an effective mechanism, can the judicial power be operated normally and reasonably, and the people who hold and exercise the judicial power will not abuse the power. Absolute power inevitably leads to absolute corruption. Therefore, the judicial power must be supervised and restricted, and the power which is not subject to supervision and restriction will be abused, which will lead to judicial arbitrariness and corruption. The historical experience is worth noting, although our judicial reform has made certain achievements, but because of the weak supervision and restriction of judicial power, judicial corruption can not be effectively contained. Because of the weak supervision and restriction of judicial power, the phenomenon of judicial corruption will be so rampant, and the abuse of judicial power will be used by those in power. In a word, it is imperative to supervise and restrict the judicial power. And how to supervise and restrict the judicial power more effectively, especially when our country is in the transition period, so how to make the judicial power fair and just, to achieve the purpose of reducing corruption and curbing corruption, we need a new angle of view. A deeper study of how to supervise and restrict judicial power. The first chapter of this article elaborated the judicial power supervision and the restriction correlation theory. First of all, the author defines judicial power as "three powers theory", that is, judicial power, procuratorial power and investigation power, and analyzes the power attribute of judicial power for the sake of the need of the research of this subject, combining with our country's national conditions and judicial practice. By analyzing the connotation of supervision and restriction of judicial power and the consequences of weak supervision and restriction, this paper points out the necessity of supervision and restriction of judicial power. The author summarizes the theoretical basis of supervision and restriction of judicial power and the advanced experience of foreign countries, which provides theoretical guidance for the reform and improvement of the supervision and restriction mechanism of judicial power in China. The second chapter analyzes the current situation and existing problems of the supervision and restriction of judicial power in our country. The judicial corruption in our country is becoming more and more serious, and the operation of judicial power is lack of necessary, reasonable and effective supervision and restriction. At present, the power of the Party and the government is too expanded; the supervision system of the people's Congress is a mere formality; the private rights themselves cannot form an effective force of supervision and restriction; the concept of "procedural justice" needs to be popularized, and the legal procedures are crude, Unable to form an effective restriction on judicial power; press law lags behind, media supervision basis is insufficient; judicial professional groups are not fully formed, judicial officials professional literacy is not high, can not ensure the proper operation of judicial power through self-discipline. In the third chapter, in order to ensure the scientific and effective supervision and restriction of judicial power, the author boldly proposes to construct the "five judicial supervision and restriction systems with Chinese characteristics", that is, the power supervision and restriction system, the right supervision and restriction system. Procedural supervision and restriction system, public opinion supervision and restriction system and moral supervision and restriction system. Under the five systems of supervision and restriction, the judicial power will be subject to comprehensive, reasonable, efficient and scientific supervision and restriction, which will enable the judicial power to run openly, fairly and justly, thus realizing judicial justice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：太原科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 肖濱;為自由主義傳統(tǒng)定位——兼評《當(dāng)代自由主義理論》[J];開放時代;1997年04期

2 車英,成協(xié)中,孫磊;論新聞輿論監(jiān)督與司法獨立[J];武漢大學(xué)學(xué)報(人文科學(xué)版);2002年06期

3 李建明;論黨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)下的司法獨立[J];政治與法律;2003年02期

，

本文編號：1886024