本文選題：自由裁量權(quán) + 影響因素��； 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：法官的自由裁量權(quán)是必然運(yùn)用的權(quán)力,運(yùn)用自由裁量權(quán)的目的在于能夠公正地適用法律,讓法律規(guī)范公平、正義的精神傳播到司法實(shí)踐中。但是,權(quán)力的存在,也會(huì)導(dǎo)致權(quán)力濫用的情況出現(xiàn)。本文重點(diǎn)探討影響法官自由裁量權(quán)行使的因素,如何規(guī)制自由裁量權(quán)的行使。 本文分為三個(gè)部分：第一部分,法官的自由裁量權(quán)概述。主要介紹自由裁量權(quán)的概念、特征及英美法系與大陸法系自由裁量權(quán)行使的區(qū)別。第二部分,影響法官自由裁量權(quán)的行使的因素。本部分主要講的是影響法官行使自由裁量權(quán)因素,即道德、歷史、習(xí)慣、社會(huì)福利等,這些因素往往是立法的依據(jù),同時(shí)也影響著司法推理過(guò)程及結(jié)果的正當(dāng)性。第三部分,自由裁量權(quán)的限制。自由裁量權(quán)是公權(quán)力的一種,公權(quán)力的濫用會(huì)導(dǎo)致人民權(quán)利的損害。本部分主要敘述限制自由裁量權(quán)的原因、及規(guī)制措施。
[Abstract]:The discretion of the judge is the power that must be used. The purpose of the discretion is to apply the law fairly, to make the law standard and fair, and to spread the spirit of justice to the judicial practice. However, the existence of power will also lead to abuse of power. This paper focuses on the factors that affect the exercise of the judge's discretion and how to regulate the exercise of the discretion. This article is divided into three parts: the first part, the judge's discretion overview. This paper mainly introduces the concept and characteristics of discretion and the difference between Anglo-American law system and civil law system in the exercise of discretion. The second part, the factors that influence the exercise of the judge's discretion. This part mainly talks about the factors that affect the judge's exercise of discretion, that is, morality, history, habit, social welfare and so on. These factors are often the basis of legislation, but also affect the process of judicial reasoning and the legitimacy of the results. The third part, the limitation of discretion. Discretionary power is a kind of public power, the abuse of public power will lead to the damage of people's rights. This part mainly narrates the reason which limits the discretion, and the regulation measure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D916.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 武宏志;“論證邏輯”的突破[J];兵團(tuán)教育學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

2 李正華;論“自由裁量權(quán)”[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2000年04期

3 宋征,胡明;從王海打假案看知假買(mǎi)假者是否消費(fèi)者——法解釋學(xué)意義上的分析[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2003年01期

4 陸幸福;;萊蒙檢驗(yàn)(Lemon Test)——美國(guó)司法處理政教分離案件的一個(gè)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2006年06期

5 沈宗靈;法律推理與法律適用[J];法學(xué);1988年05期

6 仇慎齊;;實(shí)現(xiàn)法律抑或?qū)崿F(xiàn)正義——對(duì)司法權(quán)本質(zhì)屬性的正義考量[J];法律適用;2011年02期

7 吳家國(guó);提倡和加強(qiáng)邏輯應(yīng)用研究[J];社會(huì)科學(xué)戰(zhàn)線(xiàn);1996年04期

8 王勝俊;;法律體系形成與人民法院的歷史使命[J];人民司法;2011年19期

9 公丕祥;;法律體系形成背景下能動(dòng)司法的新作為[J];人民司法;2012年01期

10 雍琦;關(guān)于法律邏輯性質(zhì)及走向的思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);1997年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1793708