本文選題：能動(dòng)司法 + 司法規(guī)律��； 參考：《華東政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：自“能動(dòng)司法”理念被中國(guó)法院高層極力倡導(dǎo)以來,該主張被認(rèn)為是我國(guó)司法的基本理念和基本方式。但是,法學(xué)界乃至司法實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)此的爭(zhēng)議就一直不斷。有些學(xué)者認(rèn)為,能動(dòng)司法是西方司法能動(dòng)主義的中國(guó)化,能動(dòng)司法有助于調(diào)解日益嚴(yán)重的社會(huì)矛盾,解決社會(huì)糾紛;也有些學(xué)者認(rèn)為,能動(dòng)司法不具有正當(dāng)性,完全背離了我國(guó)司法克制的這種傳統(tǒng)司法,容易造成法院職能的缺位、越位和錯(cuò)位,并進(jìn)一步認(rèn)為中國(guó)的法治進(jìn)程在倒退。筆者認(rèn)為,中國(guó)正處于社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型的關(guān)鍵時(shí)期,隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)的發(fā)展進(jìn)步,結(jié)合中國(guó)的具體國(guó)情,適度調(diào)整一個(gè)時(shí)期的司法理念,未嘗不可。相反,這正是中國(guó)司法發(fā)展的體現(xiàn)。 能動(dòng)司法不是司法能動(dòng)主義在中國(guó)的簡(jiǎn)單移植,兩者之間既有聯(lián)系又有區(qū)別。從古代司法傳統(tǒng)以及現(xiàn)代司法需求來看,能動(dòng)司法在中國(guó)社會(huì)有其存在的依據(jù),具有正當(dāng)性。作為一個(gè)全新的司法理念,能動(dòng)司法在中國(guó)的運(yùn)行必須要遵守一定的原則,例如能動(dòng)司法不能違背立法規(guī)律,能動(dòng)司法必須在憲法和法律范圍內(nèi)運(yùn)行以及能動(dòng)司法必須維護(hù)法律價(jià)值。 本文擬通過對(duì)能動(dòng)司法的法理分析,從能動(dòng)司法的內(nèi)涵及正當(dāng)性入手,考證能動(dòng)司法在中國(guó)存在的依據(jù),進(jìn)而著重探討其應(yīng)該遵守的一些原則。選題的目的在于通過能動(dòng)司法的法理分析,闡明能動(dòng)司法與司法規(guī)律、合法性以及法律價(jià)值之間的關(guān)系,希望借此對(duì)能動(dòng)司法有一個(gè)規(guī)制,進(jìn)而防止法院在行使司法權(quán)的過程可能出現(xiàn)的權(quán)力濫用現(xiàn)象。 由于學(xué)界乃至司法實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)能動(dòng)司法的研究較少,固通過本文的分析,筆者相信有助于學(xué)界和司法實(shí)務(wù)界認(rèn)識(shí)到該問題的重要性和緊迫性,從而對(duì)該問題進(jìn)行更為深入的研究,把能動(dòng)司法落實(shí)好,更好的促進(jìn)我國(guó)司法的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:Since the concept of "active justice" was strongly advocated by the high level of Chinese courts, it has been regarded as the basic concept and method of our country's judicature.However, legal circles and even the judicial practice of this controversy has been constantly.Some scholars believe that active justice is the Chinese character of western judicial activism, and that active justice helps to mediate the increasingly serious social contradictions and solve social disputes.This kind of traditional judicature, which completely deviates from the judicial restraint in our country, can easily lead to the absence, offside and dislocation of the function of the court, and further thinks that the process of the rule of law in China is retrogressive.The author believes that China is in the critical period of social transformation, with the development of economic and social progress, combined with the specific conditions of China, moderate adjustment of the judicial concept of a period, it is not impossible.On the contrary, this is the embodiment of China's judicial development.Active justice is not a simple transplant of judicial activism in China.From the view of ancient judicial tradition and modern judicial demand, active judicature has its existence basis and legitimacy in Chinese society.As a completely new judicial concept, active justice in China must follow certain principles. For example, active justice cannot violate the law of legislation.The active justice must operate within the scope of constitution and law, and the active justice must maintain the legal value.By analyzing the legal principle of active judicature, this paper starts with the connotation and legitimacy of active judicature, and explores the basis of the existence of active judicature in China, and then probes into some principles it should abide by.The purpose of this paper is to clarify the relationship between active judicature and judicial law, legitimacy and legal value through the legal theory analysis of active judicature, hoping to have a regulation on active judicature.And then prevent the abuse of power that the court may appear in the process of exercising judicial power.Since there are few researches on active justice in academic circles and judicial practice circles, through the analysis of this paper, the author believes that it is helpful for scholars and judicial practice circles to realize the importance and urgency of this problem, so as to carry out more in-depth research on this issue.Carry out the active judicature well, promote the development of our country's judicature better.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范愉;;訴前調(diào)解與法院的社會(huì)責(zé)任 從司法社會(huì)化到司法能動(dòng)主義[J];法律適用;2007年11期

2 公丕祥;;挑戰(zhàn)與回應(yīng)：有效滿足人民群眾司法新需求的時(shí)代思考[J];法律適用;2009年01期

3 公丕祥;;堅(jiān)持司法能動(dòng) 依法服務(wù)大局 對(duì)江蘇法院金融危機(jī)司法應(yīng)對(duì)工作的初步總結(jié)與思考[J];法律適用;2009年11期

4 蘇力;;關(guān)于能動(dòng)司法[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

5 羅東川;丁廣宇;;我國(guó)能動(dòng)司法的理論與實(shí)踐評(píng)述[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

6 ;能動(dòng)司法制度構(gòu)建初探[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

7 潘云華;;中國(guó)司法能動(dòng)的規(guī)范化構(gòu)想[J];法商研究;2010年05期

8 張笑英;楊雄;;司法規(guī)律之詮釋[J];法學(xué)雜志;2010年02期

9 梁迎修;;尋求一種溫和的司法能動(dòng)主義——論疑難案件中法官的司法哲學(xué)[J];河北法學(xué);2008年02期

10 莫敏;法治與法的價(jià)值追求[J];廣西社會(huì)科學(xué);2002年05期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 上海一中院民三庭庭長(zhǎng) 趙衛(wèi)平　上海一中院民三庭副庭長(zhǎng) 宋航;[N];法制日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 陳娜;中國(guó)古代司法中的情理探析[D];吉林大學(xué);2007年

2 房東升;能動(dòng)司法及其在新中國(guó)的實(shí)踐[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

，

本文編號(hào)：1773589