發(fā)布時間：2018-04-18 15:53

  本文選題：“大調(diào)解” + 司法��； 參考：《北京社會科學(xué)》2017年09期

【摘要】：司法謀求在"大調(diào)解"中的主導(dǎo)地位,是為履行政治職能、提升司法"治權(quán)"及保障部門自身利益的需要。在權(quán)力的單邊治理中,由于與行政機(jī)關(guān)在資源掌控與分配上的體制性不平衡,司法主導(dǎo)性停留在訴求層面,司法的實(shí)踐形態(tài)與其官方表達(dá)相背離。訴諸"能動司法",亦無法解決表達(dá)與實(shí)踐相分離的矛盾狀態(tài)。這種矛盾的結(jié)合是當(dāng)下中國司法參與社會運(yùn)動式治理的根本特色。
[Abstract]:The leading position of judicial seeking in "Great Mediation" is the need to perform political function, to promote judicial "administration of power" and to safeguard the interests of the department itself.In the unilateral governance of power, because of the system imbalance of resources control and distribution with administrative organs, the judicial dominant stay at the level of appeal, the judicial practice form deviates from its official expression.Resort to "active justice" can not solve the contradictory state of separation between expression and practice.The combination of this contradiction is the fundamental feature of the current Chinese judicial participation in social movement governance.
【作者單位】： 西北師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家社會科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(14CMZ009)
【分類號】：D926.2
，

本文編號：1769037