本文選題：抗訴 + 檢察建議　； 參考：《遼寧大學》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督方式是民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督的核心，對于民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督制度具有十分重要的作用。我國《民事訴訟法》第187至第190條對此作了規(guī)定。這對于錯誤裁判的糾正，維護當事人的利益具有十分重要的意義。 但是隨著社會經(jīng)濟的發(fā)展，，民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督方式的單一性難以達到社會的要求，在司法實踐中沒有收到理想的效果。法制的建設(shè)是一個不斷完善的過程，只有對滯后的制度進行完善，才能更有效的解決實踐中的問題，才能不斷地向前發(fā)展。蘇聯(lián)、法國、英國、美國等對民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督方式有了比較完備的規(guī)定，形成了各具特色的方式體系。各國的民事檢察監(jiān)督的性質(zhì)雖然不同，但監(jiān)督方式存在著共性。鑒于民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督立法相對成熟，因此應當吸取國外立法的精華，并結(jié)合我國具體國情，制定出適合我國國情的監(jiān)督方式。 筆者在查閱國內(nèi)外大量資料的前提下，對我國的民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督方式進行了深入的研究，并就民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督方式的完善提出了構(gòu)想。本文首先就民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督方式的概念和影響因素進行了探討。就概念而言，概念的清晰可使民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督方式的特征及性質(zhì)明確。筆者認為，民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督方式是指檢察院依法對民事訴訟進行監(jiān)督所采取的各種方法和形式。它具有法定性、主動性、非終局性和體系性的特點。其次筆者對蘇聯(lián)、法國、英國和美國的民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督方式進行了考察及分析。再次筆者考察了抗訴、檢察建議和民事公訴的現(xiàn)狀進行了分析，指出了我國民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督方式存在的問題。希望找到問題的結(jié)癥，以便未來對該制度進行完善。最后是關(guān)于民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督方式如何完善的幾點思考，通過針對民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督可能存在的問題進行分析，提出相應的完善.
[Abstract]:The way of procuratorial supervision in civil litigation is the core of procuratorial supervision in civil litigation and plays an important role in the system of procuratorial supervision in civil litigation.Articles 187 to 190 of our Civil procedure Code provide for this.This is of great significance to the correction of the error judgment and the protection of the interests of the parties concerned.However, with the development of social economy, the singularity of the way of procuratorial supervision in civil litigation is difficult to meet the requirements of the society, and no ideal effect has been obtained in judicial practice.The construction of legal system is a process of continuous improvement. Only by perfecting the lagging system, can we solve the problems in practice more effectively and develop continuously.The Soviet Union, France, Britain, the United States and so on have relatively complete stipulation to the civil lawsuit procuratorial supervision way, has formed each characteristic way system.Although the nature of civil procuratorial supervision varies from country to country, there are some common ways of supervision.In view of the relatively mature legislation of procuratorial supervision in civil litigation, it is necessary to draw on the essence of foreign legislation and to work out a supervision mode suitable for our national conditions in combination with the specific conditions of our country.On the premise of consulting a great deal of information at home and abroad, the author makes a deep study on the way of procuratorial supervision in civil litigation in China, and puts forward some ideas on how to perfect the way of procuratorial supervision in civil litigation.This paper first discusses the concept and influencing factors of the way of procuratorial supervision in civil litigation.In terms of concept, the clarity of the concept can make the characteristics and nature of procuratorial supervision in civil proceedings clear.The author thinks that the way of procuratorial supervision in civil action is the various methods and forms adopted by procuratorate to supervise civil action according to law.It has legal, active, non-final and systematic characteristics.Secondly, the author investigates and analyzes the ways of supervision of civil litigation in the Soviet Union, France, Britain and the United States.Thirdly, the author analyzes the present situation of protest, procuratorial suggestion and civil prosecution, and points out the problems existing in the way of procuratorial supervision in civil litigation in China.Hope to find a problem in order to improve the system in the future.Finally, the author thinks about how to perfect the way of procuratorial supervision in civil litigation, and puts forward the corresponding perfection by analyzing the problems that may exist in the supervision of procuratorial supervision in civil litigation.
【學位授予單位】：遼寧大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2012
【分類號】：D926.34;D925.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 潘度文;;民事檢察在民事訴訟中的空間及路徑探討[J];法學家;2010年03期

2 湯維建;;挑戰(zhàn)與應對:民行檢察監(jiān)督制度的新發(fā)展[J];法學家;2010年03期

3 江偉;謝俊;;論民事檢察監(jiān)督的方式和地位——基于憲法和民事訴訟法的分析[J];法治研究;2009年04期

4 房保國,黃勝;我國民事訴訟檢察監(jiān)督中存在的問題與探析[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2001年01期

5 施鵬鵬;;法國檢察監(jiān)督制度研究——兼與中國的比較[J];暨南學報(哲學社會科學版);2010年05期

6 楊立新;民事行政訴訟檢察監(jiān)督與司法公正[J];法學研究;2000年04期

7 宋朝武,黃海濤;外國民事檢察制度初探[J];人民檢察;2001年11期

8 江偉;略論檢察監(jiān)督權(quán)在民事訴訟中的行使[J];人民檢察;2005年18期

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前3條

1 施建清;民事檢察的權(quán)能及運作方式研究[D];廈門大學;2001年

2 范曄;略論我國民事檢察監(jiān)督方式改革的設(shè)想[D];華東政法學院;2006年

3 石威;論俄羅斯民事檢察制度[D];黑龍江大學;2008年

本文編號：1760457