本文選題：人民調(diào)解協(xié)議　切入點(diǎn)：司法確認(rèn)　出處：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：“人民調(diào)解協(xié)議司法確認(rèn)"是推進(jìn)多元化解決糾紛,搭建法院司法和人民調(diào)解對接平臺的關(guān)鍵和紐帶。本文結(jié)合司法運(yùn)作實(shí)踐,運(yùn)用訴訟法理論和實(shí)證分析方法,圍繞“人民調(diào)解協(xié)議司法確認(rèn)”的界定、功能、缺陷及完善進(jìn)行探討,以期對推進(jìn)多元化解紛機(jī)制建設(shè)有所裨益。全文分五章,分析了司法確認(rèn)制度產(chǎn)生的背景,對國內(nèi)外司法確認(rèn)制度進(jìn)行了簡單對比,詮釋了我國司法確認(rèn)制度的內(nèi)涵及特點(diǎn),對該制度的積極功能與制度缺陷進(jìn)行了客觀分析,從弘揚(yáng)司法確認(rèn)制度的正面功能與價值的角度,就彌補(bǔ)司法確認(rèn)制度的不足,完善程序設(shè)置提出了具體建議。如明確法院在司法確認(rèn)中的角色定位、合理排除虛假司法確認(rèn)、明確司法確認(rèn)申請的風(fēng)險、適當(dāng)矯正不規(guī)范的人民調(diào)解協(xié)議等,同時提出了彰顯司法確認(rèn)功能的相關(guān)配套方案和建議。本論文在創(chuàng)作中參考和借鑒了大量的參考書籍和期刊,從訴權(quán)的基本理論以及多元化解紛制度的構(gòu)建原理、ADR協(xié)議的效力等方面領(lǐng)悟相關(guān)的法的精神以及制度構(gòu)建中利益權(quán)衡的方法,在文中還用到了本人所在單位一些改革的最新成果。筆者嘗試?yán)碚撆c實(shí)踐相結(jié)合的實(shí)證分析方法,對“人民調(diào)解協(xié)議的司法確認(rèn)”這項新鮮出爐的制度進(jìn)行研究。以“挑剔”的眼光審視最高法院剛出臺的《若干規(guī)定》,提出了該制度推行過程中存在的五大缺陷和不足,尤其提出了“司法不能包攬解決全部社會矛盾和問題,司法確認(rèn)只能是人民調(diào)解協(xié)議效力確認(rèn)系統(tǒng)中的有限最終解決方案”的鮮明論點(diǎn)。
[Abstract]:"Judicial confirmation of people's Mediation Agreement" is the key and link to promote the pluralistic settlement of disputes and build the platform of court judicature and people's mediation. This paper applies the theory of procedural law and empirical analysis method in combination with judicial operation practice. This paper discusses the definition, function, defects and perfection of "Judicial confirmation of people's Mediation Agreement" in order to benefit the construction of diversified dispute resolution mechanism. The paper is divided into five chapters, and analyzes the background of judicial confirmation system. This paper makes a simple comparison of the judicial confirmation system at home and abroad, explains the connotation and characteristics of the judicial confirmation system in our country, and analyzes objectively the positive function and defects of the system. From the angle of carrying forward the positive function and value of the judicial confirmation system, this paper puts forward some concrete suggestions on how to make up the deficiency of the judicial confirmation system and perfect the procedure setting, such as clarifying the role of the court in the judicial confirmation and reasonably eliminating the false judicial confirmation. Make clear the risk of judicial confirmation application, properly correct the non-standard people's mediation agreement, and put forward the relevant supporting plans and suggestions to highlight the function of judicial confirmation. This paper has referenced and used for reference a large number of reference books and periodicals in the creation of this paper. From the basic theory of the right of action and the construction principle of the pluralistic dispute resolution system and the effectiveness of ADR agreement, the author understands the spirit of the relevant law and the method of balancing the interests in the construction of the system. In this paper, I also use some of the latest achievements of the reform of my unit. The author tries to combine theory with practice empirical analysis method, This paper studies the newly published system of "Judicial confirmation of people's Mediation Agreement". By examining the "certain provisions" just issued by the Supreme Court from a "picky" perspective, it puts forward five major defects and deficiencies in the implementation of this system. In particular, this paper puts forward a clear argument that "Justice cannot solve all social contradictions and problems, and judicial confirmation can only be a limited final solution in the system of confirming the validity of people's mediation agreement".
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 李昌道;;司法調(diào)解與和諧社會[J];復(fù)旦學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2007年02期

2 竇穎蓉;;人民調(diào)解協(xié)議訴前司法確認(rèn)機(jī)制之探究 以定西法院為例[J];法律適用;2008年Z1期

3 傅郁林;;“訴前調(diào)解”與法院的角色[J];法律適用;2009年04期

4 李家軍;;司法的效率之維[J];法律適用;2009年06期

5 姬文清;任玉峰;;“訴調(diào)對接”實(shí)務(wù)問題分析與規(guī)制[J];法律適用;2009年08期

6 王亞新;;訴調(diào)對接和對調(diào)解協(xié)議的司法審查[J];法律適用;2010年06期

7 申潔;;惡意訴訟的司法阻卻:法律的缺位與完善[J];法律適用;2010年10期

8 王樹春,王春雷;人民調(diào)解協(xié)議強(qiáng)制執(zhí)行效力初探[J];黑龍江省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2005年01期

9 浙江省高級人民法院聯(lián)合課題組;;關(guān)于人民調(diào)解協(xié)議司法確認(rèn)的調(diào)研[J];人民司法;2010年23期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 記者 張先明;[N];人民法院報;2011年

，

本文編號：1688268