本文選題：未成年人　切入點：刑罰執(zhí)行　出處：《蘇州大學》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：未成年人監(jiān)禁刑行刑模式是指在一定行刑理念的影響下,行刑機關(主要是未成年犯管教所)在刑罰執(zhí)行中形成的指導思想、方針政策、行刑原則以及一系列行刑方法和手段的總和。有學者定義為是對未成年犯人身監(jiān)禁及其教育、勞動改造和刑罰的程序與制度的實踐程式。由于未成年人的特殊性,我國《刑事訴訟法》第二百一十三條第三款規(guī)定,“對未成年犯應當在未成年犯管教所執(zhí)行刑罰”;《未成年犯管教所管理規(guī)定》第二條第二款明確規(guī)定,“由人民法院依法判處有期徒刑、無期徒刑未滿十八周歲的罪犯應當在未成年犯管教所執(zhí)行刑罰、接受教育改造�！奔热环梢嘁岩�(guī)定未成年人監(jiān)禁刑要區(qū)別于成年犯單獨執(zhí)行,其行刑模式理應不同于成年犯。但現實中,我國未成年人監(jiān)禁刑的行刑如同未成年人刑罰一樣高度成人化,現有行刑模式僅是一種與成年犯區(qū)分不同行刑場所的“相對分離”模式。該種模式既與未成年人特性不相符合,又與未成年人監(jiān)禁刑行刑趨勢和少年司法制度發(fā)展不相適應,無法滿足未成年人監(jiān)禁刑行刑的理性和現實需要,行刑方法不多、行刑制度僵化、行刑效果欠佳等矛盾急需改善。為此,本文試圖在廓清未成年人監(jiān)禁刑行刑理論基礎之上,總結和借鑒國內外正當理念和先進經驗,結合行刑實踐,探究構建一個更加符合刑罰目的與宗旨,更能體現行刑效果的“相對獨立”的行刑模式。 第一部分對未成年人監(jiān)禁刑行刑模式作了基本概述,簡要介紹了我國未成年人監(jiān)禁刑行刑的發(fā)展歷程,分析比較了未成年人與成年人監(jiān)禁刑的行刑現狀。 第二部分對現有行刑模式從事物內容和形式兩個哲學層面解析了該模式的內涵與主要構成。通過兩個層面的闡述,體現出現有模式本身蘊含著內容與形式不相適應的矛盾,進一步分析了現有模式存在的主要弊端及成因。 第三部分對國外主要國家未成年人監(jiān)禁刑的行刑概況進行了考察、評析,并結合我國情況,比較得出可資借鑒的啟示和經驗。 第四部分對未成年人監(jiān)禁刑行刑的理論基礎進行了探尋,在此基礎上,結合第三部分內容綜合考察了未成年人監(jiān)禁刑行刑的主要趨勢。 第五部分是本文的主體,在前四部分研究的基礎上,探討未成年人監(jiān)禁刑行刑模式的具體完善。該部分沒有按照前文分析現有模式之不足與弊端的順序逐條提出完善對策,而是糅合對策于一體,形成了一個較為整合系統(tǒng)的完善方案,前文的每一點不足與每一項弊端都在整體方案中得到了回應。
[Abstract]:The mode of execution of juvenile imprisonment refers to the guiding ideology, principles and policies formed in the execution of punishment by the execution organs (mainly juvenile correctional institutions) under the influence of certain execution concepts. The principle of execution and the summation of a series of methods and means of execution. Some scholars have defined it as a practical program of the procedure and system of physical imprisonment, education, reform through labour and punishment for juvenile offenders. Article 213, paragraph 3, of China's Criminal procedure Law stipulates that "juvenile offenders shall be punished in correctional institutions for juvenile offenders"; Article 2, paragraph 2, clearly stipulates that "the people's court shall administer juvenile offenders." Sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment according to law, A criminal under the age of 18 years of life imprisonment shall carry out the punishment in a correctional facility for juvenile offenders and undergo educational reform. "since the law has also stipulated that the sentence of imprisonment of a minor shall be separate from that of an adult prisoner, Its execution mode should be different from that of adult criminals, but in reality, the execution of juvenile imprisonment in China is as highly adult as juvenile punishment. The existing execution mode is only a "relative separation" model that distinguishes the execution place from the adult offender. This mode is not only inconsistent with the characteristics of the minor, but also incompatible with the tendency of the juvenile imprisonment execution and the development of the juvenile justice system, which is not only in accordance with the characteristics of the minor, but also with the development of the juvenile justice system. Unable to meet the rational and realistic needs of juvenile imprisonment, the execution methods are not many, the execution system is rigid, the execution effect is not good, and so on. Therefore, this paper tries to clarify the theory of juvenile imprisonment execution on the basis of. By summing up and drawing lessons from domestic and foreign legitimate ideas and advanced experiences, combining with execution practice, this paper explores and constructs a "relatively independent" execution mode which is more in line with the purpose and purpose of punishment and can reflect the effect of execution. The first part gives a basic overview of the execution mode of juvenile imprisonment, briefly introduces the development process of juvenile imprisonment in China, and analyzes and compares the present situation of juvenile and adult imprisonment. In the second part, the author analyzes the connotation and main composition of the existing execution model from the two philosophical levels of content and form. Through the elaboration of the two levels, there is a contradiction that the content and form are not suitable for the mode itself. The main disadvantages and causes of the existing models are further analyzed. In the third part, the author makes an investigation on the execution of juvenile imprisonment in foreign countries, analyzes and compares the enlightenment and experience that can be used for reference in the light of the situation of our country. The fourth part explores the theoretical basis of the execution of juvenile imprisonment, on this basis, combined with the third part of the content of a comprehensive investigation of the main trends of juvenile imprisonment. The fifth part is the main body of this paper, on the basis of the first four parts of the study, discusses the specific perfection of the execution mode of juvenile imprisonment. Instead, it combines the game to form a more integrated system of the perfect scheme, each point of the previous deficiencies and each of the drawbacks in the overall scheme has been responded.
【學位授予單位】：蘇州大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.7

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前6條

1 王利榮;自由刑執(zhí)行中的若干法律問題[J];山東法學;1999年01期

2 陳向陽;;試論新形勢下我國行刑模式的構建[J];社會科學戰(zhàn)線;2008年11期

3 康均心,李娜;我國未成年人犯罪刑罰執(zhí)行制度研究——兼論社區(qū)矯正制度[J];現代法學;2005年06期

4 張紹彥;刑事執(zhí)行新探[J];現代法學;1998年03期

5 楊鳳寧;;構建中國未成年人犯罪非監(jiān)禁制度研究[J];云南大學學報(法學版);2008年06期

6 趙秉志;;當代中國刑罰制度改革論綱[J];中國法學;2008年03期

，

本文編號：1686728