本文選題：民意　切入點(diǎn)：司法　出處：《上海師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：民意與司法的關(guān)系是我國(guó)現(xiàn)代法治建設(shè)過(guò)程中一個(gè)重要的問(wèn)題，二者之間的關(guān)系是極為復(fù)雜的。民意表達(dá)是促成社會(huì)公平正義的方式之一，而司法是實(shí)現(xiàn)社會(huì)公正的主要方式和社會(huì)正義的最后一道防線，，民意與司法之間將會(huì)不可避免地發(fā)生沖突。如何解決民意與司法之間的沖突，緩和、化解二者之間的矛盾，尋求司法獨(dú)立與民意訴求的統(tǒng)一，實(shí)現(xiàn)民眾的正義期待與司法正義的契合，是我國(guó)現(xiàn)代化法治建設(shè)必須要面臨的問(wèn)題。 本文立足于當(dāng)代中國(guó)社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)、司法現(xiàn)狀，立足于法理學(xué)高度，立足于理論與實(shí)際相結(jié)合的原則，在司法領(lǐng)域內(nèi)分析解構(gòu)民意，探索在堅(jiān)持司法獨(dú)立的同時(shí)考慮民意訴求的機(jī)制，提出了司法考慮民意的“度”與“量”，期望通過(guò)司法對(duì)民意的積極引導(dǎo)和回應(yīng)，來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)民意與司法二者之間的溝通、協(xié)調(diào)、整合，使民意能夠通過(guò)正當(dāng)合法的途徑進(jìn)入司法運(yùn)作中來(lái)，通過(guò)民意的理性表達(dá)和轉(zhuǎn)化，實(shí)現(xiàn)民意與司法的良性互動(dòng)。 本文正文部分首先從李昌奎案引出目前某類案件所體現(xiàn)的司法與民意的緊張關(guān)系，繼而從司法角度分析解構(gòu)民意。在分析民意特點(diǎn)、民意與公意關(guān)系的基礎(chǔ)上，重點(diǎn)論證司法如何對(duì)待與回應(yīng)民意。在司法對(duì)待民意的問(wèn)題上，本文論證了在司法能力有限性的范圍內(nèi)司法考慮民意的“度”與“量”，提出了法官應(yīng)該為在司法個(gè)案中考慮民意提供合法、充分的理由，做到司法獨(dú)立與民意訴求的統(tǒng)一，同時(shí)強(qiáng)調(diào)了司法要發(fā)揮對(duì)民意的積極引導(dǎo)作用。本文最后從司法整體角度提出了司法應(yīng)通過(guò)職業(yè)化再建設(shè)、構(gòu)建民意進(jìn)入司法的正當(dāng)程序等制度化措施以回應(yīng)民意。
[Abstract]:The relationship between public opinion and justice is an important issue in the construction of modern rule of law in China, and the relationship between them is extremely complicated. Public opinion expression is one of the ways to promote social justice and fairness. Justice is the main way to realize social justice and the last line of defense of social justice. There will inevitably be a conflict between public opinion and justice. How to resolve the conflict between public opinion and justice, ease up and resolve the contradiction between them, To seek the unity of judicial independence and public opinion, and to realize the agreement between the people's justice expectation and judicial justice, is the problem that must be faced in the construction of our country's modernization of the rule of law. This article is based on the reality of contemporary Chinese society, the current situation of justice, the height of jurisprudence, the principle of combining theory with practice, and analyzes the deconstruction of public opinion in the judicial field. Exploring the mechanism of considering the demands of public opinion while upholding the independence of the judiciary, putting forward the "degree" and "quantity" of judicial consideration of public opinion, hoping to realize the communication and coordination between the public opinion and the judiciary through the positive guidance and response of the judiciary to the public opinion. The integration enables public opinion to enter the judicial operation through the legitimate way, through the public opinion rational expression and the transformation, realizes the public opinion and the judicature benign interaction. In the main part of this paper, the tension between judicature and public opinion embodied in a certain type of case is first drawn from the case of Li Changkui, and then the deconstruction of public opinion is analyzed from the angle of judicature. On the basis of analyzing the characteristics of public opinion, the relationship between public opinion and public will, Focusing on how the judiciary treats and responds to public opinion. On the issue of judicial treatment of public opinion, This paper demonstrates the "degree" and "quantity" of judicial consideration of public opinion within the limits of judicial capacity, and puts forward that judges should provide legal and sufficient reasons for considering public opinion in judicial cases, so as to achieve the unity of judicial independence and public opinion demands. At the end of this paper, the author points out that the judicial system should be constructed through professionalization, and the due process of public opinion should be constructed in order to respond to the public opinion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：上海師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 秦川;;民意關(guān)注司法審判的法理思考[J];北方工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年04期

2 周永坤;;民意審判與審判元規(guī)則[J];法學(xué);2009年08期

3 呂芳;;中國(guó)法院10年(2000～2010年)法律適用問(wèn)題探討[J];法學(xué);2011年07期

4 車浩;;從李昌奎案看“鄰里糾紛”與“手段殘忍”的涵義[J];法學(xué);2011年08期

5 周詳;;罪刑法定主義視角下“賽家鑫”案再審問(wèn)題之剖析[J];法學(xué);2011年08期

6 胡高權(quán);朱傳俊;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)民意為何沸騰[J];法治與社會(huì);2010年07期

7 王卉;王群;;民意抑或法意——法官審判中的價(jià)值選擇[J];湖南涉外經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

8 韓蕾;;社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型中的司法與民意——構(gòu)建程序化的民意介入機(jī)制[J];理論觀察;2009年03期

9 朱文雁;;司法視角下的民意審視[J];山東社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年07期

10 孫萬(wàn)懷;;論民意在刑事司法中的解構(gòu)[J];中外法學(xué);2011年01期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 周林剛;[N];人民日?qǐng)?bào);2012年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 李振雨;現(xiàn)代法治視野下的民意與司法關(guān)系研究[D];中南民族大學(xué);2010年

2 李文俊;民意與司法關(guān)系研究[D];上海交通大學(xué);2007年

3 林兵;尋求民意與司法公正的平衡[D];吉林大學(xué);2008年

4 李昌昊;權(quán)利與權(quán)力之溝通、協(xié)調(diào)與合意[D];蘇州大學(xué);2007年

本文編號(hào)：1657911