本文選題：看守所　切入點(diǎn)：未決羈押人　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著二戰(zhàn)之后國際人權(quán)保障運(yùn)動(dòng)的蓬勃發(fā)展,各國愈加重視加強(qiáng)刑事被追訴人的人權(quán)保障,特別是被追訴人辯護(hù)權(quán)朝著不斷擴(kuò)大的方向發(fā)展。在此背景下,法律援助制度成為各國刑事司法改革最為重要的內(nèi)容之一。然法律援助制度面臨著一個(gè)普遍的難題,即如何突破法律援助范圍的有限性,平等地保障所有被追訴人獲得律師幫助。對(duì)此,各國開始建立了值班律師制度。值班律師制度是為了保障刑事案件被追訴人基本權(quán)利而專門設(shè)立的一項(xiàng)刑事法律援助制度,是國家在司法制度運(yùn)行的各個(gè)環(huán)節(jié)與各個(gè)層次上,對(duì)于需要法律救濟(jì)保障其自身基本權(quán)利的被追訴人提供免費(fèi)的法律服務(wù),不以被追訴人的經(jīng)濟(jì)狀況、涉案情況為服務(wù)的限定對(duì)象。我國關(guān)押未決羈押人的主要場所是看守所,在我國法律援助范圍有限的情形下,多數(shù)被羈押人在看守所是無法獲得足夠律師幫助的。而在看守所這一特殊場域以及較為特殊的時(shí)間階段,我國確有構(gòu)建看守所值班律師制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)需要且在司法實(shí)踐中看守所值班律師制度已經(jīng)開始逐步實(shí)施。看守所值班律師制度對(duì)于有效保障未決羈押人獲得免費(fèi)、即時(shí)的律師幫助,以及實(shí)現(xiàn)司法平等與公正,維護(hù)未決羈押人基本權(quán)利,落實(shí)刑事訴訟早期階段法律援助,規(guī)范、監(jiān)督偵查權(quán)的依法行使等方面發(fā)揮著重要的作用。看守所值班律師與辯護(hù)律師、法律援助律師最為顯著的不同在于其性質(zhì)具有中立性。該中立性決定了其權(quán)利義務(wù)與辯護(hù)律師、法律援助律師的不同�？词厮蛋嗦蓭煘槲礇Q羈押人提供法律服務(wù)的主要方式是會(huì)見咨詢和電話咨詢�？词厮蛋嗦蓭熤贫冗m用對(duì)象的廣泛性特征,對(duì)我國看守所會(huì)見流程提出了新要求。看守所值班律師制度場域的特殊性,決定了該制度運(yùn)行必然會(huì)與看守所之間產(chǎn)生諸多聯(lián)系。只有在看守所全力配合協(xié)助下,值班律師方能有效進(jìn)行法律服務(wù)、未決羈押人方能獲得值班律師服務(wù)。看守所值班律師制度的運(yùn)行,需注重發(fā)揮值班律師與駐所檢察官兩者之間的配合協(xié)作,以期對(duì)偵查活動(dòng)形成內(nèi)外部監(jiān)督合力。在此同時(shí),該制度的有效運(yùn)行,也必然離不開保障機(jī)制的建立,其中最為關(guān)鍵的是要解決值班律師數(shù)量與質(zhì)量問題。
[Abstract]:With the vigorous development of the international human rights guarantee movement after the second World War, countries pay more and more attention to strengthening the human rights protection of the prosecuted persons, especially the right of the prosecuted persons to defend towards the expanding direction. In this context, The legal aid system has become one of the most important contents of the criminal justice reform in various countries. However, the legal aid system is faced with a common problem, that is, how to break through the limitation of the scope of legal aid. In response to this, States began to establish a system of duty lawyers, a criminal legal aid system specifically established to safeguard the fundamental rights of persons prosecuted in criminal cases, It is that the state provides free legal services to the accused who need legal relief to protect their basic rights at all stages and at all levels of the operation of the judicial system, and does not take the economic situation of the accused person into account. The main place where the outstanding detainees are held in China is the detention centre. In the case of the limited scope of legal aid in our country, Most detainees do not have access to adequate counsel in detention facilities. In this particular field and at a relatively special time stage, In our country, it is necessary to construct the system of watchman in detention center, and in judicial practice, the system of duty lawyer in detention house has been implemented step by step. The help of prompt lawyers, as well as the realization of justice equality and justice, the protection of the fundamental rights of pending detainees, the implementation of legal aid in the early stages of criminal proceedings, and the regulation of legal aid, The most significant difference between the lawyer on duty in the detention center and the defense lawyer is that the legal aid lawyer is neutral in nature, which determines the right and duty of the lawyer and the defense lawyer. The main way for lawyers on duty to provide legal services for pending detainees is to meet with consultation and telephone consultation. This paper puts forward a new request to the meeting process of the detention center in our country. The particularity of the field of the system of the lawyers on duty in the detention center determines that the operation of the system will inevitably have many relations with the detention center. Only with the full cooperation and assistance of the detention center, Only the lawyer on duty can effectively carry out the legal service, and the pending detainees can obtain the service of the lawyer on duty. In the operation of the duty lawyer system in the detention center, we should pay attention to the cooperation between the lawyer on duty and the procurator on duty. At the same time, the effective operation of this system is bound to be inseparable from the establishment of the safeguard mechanism, the most crucial of which is to solve the problem of quantity and quality of the lawyer on duty.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：D926.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳衛(wèi)東;;認(rèn)罪認(rèn)罰從寬制度研究[J];中國法學(xué);2016年02期

2 張千帆;;如何設(shè)計(jì)司法?法官、律師與案件數(shù)量比較研究[J];比較法研究;2016年01期

3 羅海敏;;論無律師幫助被追訴人之弱勢處境及改善——以刑事法律援助制度的完善為視角[J];政法論壇;2014年06期

4 熊秋紅;;刑事簡易速裁程序之權(quán)利保障與體系化建構(gòu)[J];人民檢察;2014年17期

5 陳衛(wèi)東;程雷;;看守所實(shí)施新刑事訴訟法實(shí)證研究報(bào)告[J];政法論叢;2014年04期

6 趙秉志;;薄熙來案件審判的法理問題研究(上)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2014年03期

7 陳永生;;刑事法律援助的中國問題與域外經(jīng)驗(yàn)[J];比較法研究;2014年01期

8 陳瑞華;;論被告人的自主性辯護(hù)權(quán)——以“被告人會(huì)見權(quán)”為切入的分析[J];法學(xué)家;2013年06期

9 郭婕;;國際法律援助組織第十屆會(huì)議綜述[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2013年06期

10 蘇鏡祥;;審前階段刑事法律援助實(shí)證分析——以新《刑事訴訟法》實(shí)施為背景[J];法學(xué)論壇;2013年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前2條

1 穆遠(yuǎn)征;程雷;;建立偵查訊問中律師在場制度[N];中國社會(huì)科學(xué)報(bào);2016年

2 刁凡超;;值班律師制度的羅田樣本[N];民主與法制時(shí)報(bào);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 賈翔宇;值班律師制度研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

，

本文編號(hào)：1654019