本文選題：能動司法　切入點：司法權(quán)　出處：《南京師范大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文

【摘要】：能動司法的提出可謂是中國法律人順應(yīng)歷史潮流對傳統(tǒng)司法理念的調(diào)整和革新。在這個調(diào)整和革新的過程中,勢必會對傳統(tǒng)司法理念的一些基本價值觀念構(gòu)成沖擊和挑戰(zhàn)。這就需要能動司法保持一定的限度,在合理的邊界內(nèi)良好運(yùn)行,從而防止司法權(quán)的擅斷和濫用,這就要求能動司法必須堅持黨的領(lǐng)導(dǎo),堅持司法的基本價值取向,樹立司法權(quán)威,結(jié)合自身特點和基本國情,以此指導(dǎo)司法實踐,為我國司法制度的合理構(gòu)建添磚添瓦。此外為了能使能動司法在司法實踐中良好運(yùn)行,我們還必須深刻認(rèn)識其法理依據(jù),做到求本溯源,牢牢抓住其本質(zhì)和精髓,只有這樣才能對我們更好的認(rèn)識能動司法理念起到一個高屋建瓴的作用。 綜上所述,本文旨在揭示能動司法的內(nèi)在依據(jù),探尋其合理邊界,為了能更好的探討這個問題,本文分為三個部分：第一部分主要介紹能動司法的一般理論,對能動司法的內(nèi)涵、本質(zhì)屬性,基本特征等作一個概括了解,為論述能動司法的法理依據(jù)和邊界提供理論土壤。在這一部分中作者充分引用了國內(nèi)外著名法學(xué)家對能動司法的相關(guān)研究,并結(jié)合對美國司法能動主義內(nèi)涵的探討,系統(tǒng)的對我國能動司法的基本問題做了深入的論述。這對我們更深刻的理解能動司法起到了非常重要的作用。第二部分主要從司法權(quán)的特征及其運(yùn)作規(guī)律入手闡釋能動司法的法理依據(jù)。這可以說是本文的一點創(chuàng)新,通過對司法權(quán)的特征和其運(yùn)作規(guī)律的研究我們會發(fā)現(xiàn)能動司法不但沒有顛覆傳統(tǒng)司法理念的基本價值,而且還迎合和深化了傳統(tǒng)司法理念的價值取向,并且拓寬和加深了司法權(quán)研究的廣度和深度。通過對司法權(quán)系統(tǒng)深入的探究找到能動司法背后所蘊(yùn)含的法理,以此指導(dǎo)我們的司法實踐。第三部分主要尋求能動司法的限度,首先論述了能動司法規(guī)制的必要性,然后從“他律”和“自限”兩方面入手探討能動司法的邊界,通過對國外相關(guān)制度的分析和研究并結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)階段司法基本國情,找到一個合理的邊界來規(guī)制能動司法,以此防止司法權(quán)的擅斷和濫用。從而使能動司法的理念更好的為社會主義法制建設(shè)服務(wù)。
[Abstract]:The proposal of active justice can be described as the adjustment and innovation of the traditional judicial concept by Chinese legal personnel following the trend of history. In this process of adjustment and innovation, It will inevitably impact and challenge some basic values of the traditional judicial concept. This requires that the judicial system should be kept to a certain limit and run well within a reasonable boundary, thus preventing the judicial power from being arbitrary and abused. This requires that the active judiciary must adhere to the leadership of the party, adhere to the basic value orientation of the judiciary, establish judicial authority, combine its own characteristics and basic national conditions to guide judicial practice. In addition, in order to make the active judicature run well in judicial practice, we must deeply understand its legal basis, so as to trace its origin and grasp its essence and essence. Only in this way can we better understand the active concept of justice play a role from a strategic point. To sum up, this paper aims to reveal the internal basis of active justice, explore its reasonable boundaries, in order to better explore this problem, this paper is divided into three parts: the first part mainly introduces the general theory of active justice. To make a general understanding of the connotation, nature and basic characteristics of active justice, In this part, the author makes a full reference to the relevant research on active justice made by famous jurists at home and abroad, and probes into the connotation of judicial activism in the United States. The basic problems of active justice in our country are discussed systematically, which plays a very important role in our deeper understanding of active justice. The second part mainly discusses the characteristics of judicial power and its operation rules. The legal basis for the release and active administration of justice. This can be said to be a little innovation in this paper. Through the study of the characteristics of judicial power and its operation law, we can find that active justice not only does not subvert the basic value of traditional judicial idea, but also caters to and deepens the value orientation of traditional judicial idea. It also widens and deepens the breadth and depth of the research on judicial power. Through the deep exploration of judicial power system, it finds out the legal theory behind the active judicature in order to guide our judicial practice. The third part mainly seeks the limits of active judicature. This paper first discusses the necessity of active judicial regulation, then probes into the boundary of active judicature from the two aspects of "heteronomy" and "self-restriction", through the analysis and study of relevant foreign systems and combining with the basic conditions of our country's current judicial situation. To find a reasonable boundary to regulate active justice, so as to prevent judicial power from arbitrary and abuse, so that the concept of active justice better serve for the construction of socialist legal system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：南京師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李浩;;能動司法視野下的鄉(xiāng)土社會的審判方法——陳燕萍辦案方法解讀[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2010年05期

2 楊建軍;;“司法能動”在中國的展開[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報);2010年01期

3 李輝;;司法能動主義與司法克制主義的比較分析[J];法律方法;2009年00期

4 龐凌;法院如何尋求司法能動主義與克制主義的平衡[J];法律適用;2004年01期

5 唐力;;能動司法:法院訴訟指揮權(quán)之法理分析[J];法律適用;2006年05期

6 公丕祥;;堅持司法能動 依法服務(wù)大局 對江蘇法院金融危機(jī)司法應(yīng)對工作的初步總結(jié)與思考[J];法律適用;2009年11期

7 夏錦文;;當(dāng)下能動司法亟待處理的六大關(guān)系及解決思路[J];法律適用;2010年10期

8 顧培東;;司法能動主義的蘊(yùn)含[J];法律適用;2010年Z1期

9 龍宗智,李常青;論司法獨立與司法受制[J];法學(xué);1998年12期

10 王勝俊;;深入學(xué)習(xí)實踐科學(xué)發(fā)展觀 堅持為大局服務(wù)為人民司法[J];求是;2009年04期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 房東升;能動司法及其在新中國的實踐[D];南京師范大學(xué);2008年

2 王巖;論司法權(quán)的運(yùn)作[D];山東大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1653965