本文選題：指導(dǎo)性案例　切入點(diǎn)：性質(zhì)　出處：《中國政法大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：從20世紀(jì)80年代最高人民法院發(fā)布“典型案例”開始,中經(jīng)地方各級(jí)人民法院對案例指導(dǎo)法官審判工作的地方性探索和區(qū)域性實(shí)踐,然后時(shí)間定格在2010年11月26日——最高人民法院發(fā)布(法發(fā)【2010】51號(hào))《關(guān)于案例指導(dǎo)工作的規(guī)定》。1可以說,《案例指導(dǎo)規(guī)定》的出臺(tái)是最高人民法院對案例指導(dǎo)探索與實(shí)踐的肯定和升華,其意義重大,自不待言。但是,這并不意味著我國當(dāng)下的案例指導(dǎo)工作不存在問題。相反,問題是多面向的:既有法律規(guī)定上的問題,又有法官對于指導(dǎo)性案例適用上的問題。多面向的問題相互交織,使得法官在審判實(shí)踐之中,往往不知所措。而這正是本文的出發(fā)點(diǎn)。本文試圖在問題相互交織的困境中,梳理出一條相對清晰的線索。這不僅僅是給予指導(dǎo)性案例以歷史、現(xiàn)實(shí)的考察和法律定位,更是為法官適用指導(dǎo)性案例提供一種方法、技巧上的門路。 本文采取的研究方法主要是歷史的方法、實(shí)證的方法和比較的方法。 文章的主體部分有三。第一部分是關(guān)于我國司法中的案例指導(dǎo)傳統(tǒng)與發(fā)展?fàn)顩r的分析。對于我國司法中的案例傳統(tǒng),文章主要是通過歸納、總結(jié)的方法說明——借鑒、參考案例是我國司法運(yùn)行中的內(nèi)在規(guī)律,我國司法實(shí)踐具有良好的案例指導(dǎo)傳統(tǒng)。同時(shí),在當(dāng)下,呈現(xiàn)出了“上下互動(dòng)”的模式——最高人民法院和地方各級(jí)人民法院在不同的層面上探索案例指導(dǎo)實(shí)踐的最佳路徑,取得了一定的成效,因而催生了《案例指導(dǎo)規(guī)定》的出臺(tái)。然后,文章對此規(guī)定進(jìn)行了批判式的解讀和分析。 第二部分,主要是對依據(jù)《案例指導(dǎo)規(guī)定》所產(chǎn)生的“指導(dǎo)性案例”的分析,包括其概念、性質(zhì)、價(jià)值和效力等。首先,文章區(qū)分了指導(dǎo)性案例與大陸法系判例二者之間的差異。其次,對于指導(dǎo)性案例性質(zhì)的認(rèn)定,文章提出了“規(guī)范法律適用說”的觀點(diǎn),并進(jìn)行了論證。然后,文章從“內(nèi)在視角”和“外在視角”兩個(gè)方面對指導(dǎo)性案例的價(jià)值進(jìn)行了分析。最后,對于指導(dǎo)性案例的效力樣態(tài),文章在歸納學(xué)界各種觀點(diǎn)的基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合“軟法”理論,提出了自己的見解,即指導(dǎo)性案例不具有強(qiáng)制性的法律拘束力,但是在司法實(shí)踐中能夠產(chǎn)生實(shí)際效果。 第三部分,是關(guān)于指導(dǎo)性案例如何適用的部分。文章認(rèn)為,指導(dǎo)性案例適用的條件主要有兩個(gè):一是缺乏具體的制定法規(guī)范,存在法律漏洞;二是存在與系爭案件相互照應(yīng)的指導(dǎo)性案例。爾后,文章對尋找指導(dǎo)性案例的途徑進(jìn)行了分析,即“法官如何尋找指導(dǎo)性案例”。再者,文章對指導(dǎo)性案例中具有“指導(dǎo)作用”的部分進(jìn)行了分析和闡述,指出案例指導(dǎo)規(guī)則和法律說理部分對于后案法官具有裁判規(guī)則意義上的指導(dǎo)、參照和裁判說理上的支持。 總而言之,指導(dǎo)性案例對于法官的審判活動(dòng)具有重要意義。然而,由于《案例指導(dǎo)規(guī)定》對于指導(dǎo)性案例的法律定位模糊,加上我國法官長期以來形成的成文法法律思維模式,所以,指導(dǎo)性案例作用的充分發(fā)揮尚需時(shí)日。盡管如此,仍然值得期待指導(dǎo)性案例在我國的司法實(shí)踐中寫下濃墨重彩的一筆。
[Abstract]:From 1980s the Supreme People's Court issued the "typical case", the local people's court judge for the case guidance work of local regional exploration and practice, and then the time fixed in the November 26, 2010, the Supreme People's Court issued (issued by [2010] No. 51) "provisions on the case to guide the work of the >.1 can be said that the introduction of guidelines > < case is the Supreme People's Court on the exploration and practice of case guidance affirmation and sublimation, it is of great significance, It goes without saying that. But this does not mean that the case guidance work of our current work is not a problem. Instead, the problem is multifaceted: there are legal provisions on the issue, and judges for the application of the guiding case. For problems are intertwined, the judges in judicial practice, often at a loss. And this is the starting point of this paper. This paper tries to In the dilemma of intertwined problems, a relatively clear clue is carted out. This is not only a historical, realistic investigation and legal orientation for guiding cases, but also a way for judges to apply guiding cases.
The research methods adopted in this paper are mainly historical methods, empirical methods and comparative methods.
The main part of the article three. The first part is the analysis of the traditional case guidance and development status about our country. For the case in the judicial tradition in our judicial, the article is mainly through the induction, summary methods - reference, reference case is the inherent law of China's judicial operation, good case guidance the traditional judicial practice in our country. At the same time, in the moment, showing the "best path interactive" mode -- the Supreme People's court and the local people's courts at all levels to explore the case guiding practice in different level, and achieved certain results, and thus gave birth to the introduction of guidelines > < case. Then, the article the regulations for the interpretation and analysis of critical.
The second part is mainly on the basis of "case guidance provisions on the" guiding case "analysis, including its concept, nature, value and effectiveness. Firstly, this article distinguishes the difference between the guiding case and civil law case two. Secondly, that the guiding case nature, the put forward the" "point of view for legal norms, and the demonstration is carried out. Then, the paper analyzes the value of guiding cases from two aspects:" internal point of view "and" external perspective ". Finally, the validity of state guidance case, the article summed up in science circles on the views. Combination of" soft law "theory, put forward their own views, namely guiding cases do not have mandatory legal binding, but in judicial practice can have a real effect.
The third part is about how to apply the guiding case. The article believes that there are two main guiding case applicable conditions: one is the lack of specific law norms, there are legal loopholes; two is the guiding case existence and the case of each other. Then, the paper analyzes ways the guiding case, namely "the judge how to find the guide case. Furthermore, the article has the" guidance "part explains and analyses the guiding case, pointed out that the case guiding rules and legal reasoning part for case law officer has judicial rules of guidance, reference and referee reasoning support.
In a word, the guiding case has important significance for the judicial activities of the judges. However, because of the case guidance provisions for < the legal position of guiding case is fuzzy, coupled with China's judge the long-standing statutory law thinking, therefore, give full play to the role of guiding case will take time. Nevertheless, still worth looking forward to the guidance case write thick and heavy in colours in the judicial practice of our country in a pen.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 季煥爽;曲洋逸;;論人民法院案例指導(dǎo)制度與司法解釋制度之關(guān)系定位[J];公民與法(法學(xué)版);2012年11期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 李虹;制度創(chuàng)新語境下的案例指導(dǎo)制度研究[D];海南大學(xué);2012年

2 苗昊聰;試論最高人民法院案例指導(dǎo)制度[D];中國青年政治學(xué)院;2012年

3 胡秋妍;案例指導(dǎo)制度研究[D];甘肅政法學(xué)院;2012年

4 劉璐;司法公正理念下的案例指導(dǎo)制度研究[D];遼寧師范大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1639636