本文選題：司法　切入點(diǎn)：寬容　出處：《中共中央黨校》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在當(dāng)代社會(huì),寬容不僅是個(gè)體的美德,更是成為國(guó)家機(jī)構(gòu)配置和運(yùn)作權(quán)力的必要策略,也對(duì)司法活動(dòng)產(chǎn)生深刻影響。本論文主要采取規(guī)范研究法和定性研究法,分為三部分分別探討司法寬容的概念、理論根據(jù)和適用限度。第一部分,通過(guò)用語(yǔ)習(xí)慣抽象出寬容的必要要素和排除出寬容的反對(duì)要素,界定了寬容和司法寬容的概念,并考察了寬容與怯弱、冷漠,司法寬容與司法寬恕、縱容、寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)的關(guān)系,列舉了司法寬容的實(shí)踐案例。第二部分,從理論上探討司法寬容的正當(dāng)性根據(jù)。其哲學(xué)依據(jù)是價(jià)值相對(duì)主義和適度禁欲主義。司法寬容并非背離司法的正義使命,而是立法寬容的延伸和司法與民意互動(dòng)的結(jié)果。正義包括了人們的功利性要求,有限度的寬容還具有功利價(jià)值。第三部分,以保衛(wèi)寬容、謹(jǐn)遵法律和民眾監(jiān)督三項(xiàng)原則嘗試為司法寬容的適用設(shè)置限度。在社會(huì)生活節(jié)奏日益加快和國(guó)際法律文化交流日益深刻的大背景下,本文旨在以司法的寬容為切入點(diǎn),揭示司法機(jī)關(guān)積極而適當(dāng)?shù)匕缪萆鐣?huì)改革和保護(hù)話語(yǔ)弱勢(shì)群體角色的趨勢(shì)。
[Abstract]:In contemporary society, tolerance is not only an individual virtue, but also a necessary strategy for the allocation and operation of state institutions, and also has a profound impact on judicial activities. It is divided into three parts to discuss the concept, theoretical basis and applicable limit of judicial tolerance. The first part abstracts the necessary elements of tolerance and excludes the opposing elements of tolerance through idioms, and defines the concepts of tolerance and judicial tolerance. It also examines the relationship between tolerance and weakness, indifference, judicial tolerance and judicial forgiveness, connivance and leniency, and enumerates practical cases of judicial tolerance. This paper discusses the justification of judicial tolerance theoretically. Its philosophical basis is value relativism and moderate asceticism. Judicial tolerance does not deviate from the just mission of judicature. It is the result of the extension of legislative tolerance and the interaction between justice and public opinion. Justice includes people's utilitarian demands, and limited tolerance also has utilitarian value. Following the three principles of law and public supervision, this paper attempts to set limits for the application of judicial tolerance. Under the background of the accelerating pace of social life and the increasingly profound international legal and cultural exchanges, this paper aims at taking judicial tolerance as the starting point. It reveals the tendency of the judiciary to play the role of social reform and protection of discourse vulnerable groups actively and appropriately.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中共中央黨校
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D916

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 廖明;;論刑事和解的客體[J];比較法研究;2010年05期

2 劉東根;恢復(fù)性司法及其對(duì)我國(guó)刑事司法實(shí)踐的借鑒[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年02期

3 劉仁文;;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)的刑事政策研究[J];當(dāng)代法學(xué);2008年01期

4 約安娜·庫(kù)茨拉底;論寬容和寬容的限度[J];第歐根尼;1998年02期

5 莫妮克·坎托-斯佩伯,鐘良明;我們能寬容到什么程度[J];第歐根尼;1999年01期

6 保羅·利科,費(fèi)杰;寬容的銷蝕和不寬容的抵制[J];第歐根尼;1999年01期

7 陳興良;;寬嚴(yán)相濟(jì)刑事政策研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年01期

8 劉敏;論司法公開(kāi)的擴(kuò)張與限制[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2001年05期

9 郭道暉;;認(rèn)真對(duì)待權(quán)力[J];法學(xué);2011年01期

10 衛(wèi)華;新自由主義及其批判[J];國(guó)外理論動(dòng)態(tài);1999年12期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 張善q，

本文編號(hào)：1556609