本文關鍵詞： 自媒體時代 律師 網絡言論 規(guī)制 治理 職業(yè)倫理　出處：《四川理工學院學報(社會科學版)》2017年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：作為庭外言論的一種,律師網絡言論近年來從"熱鬧非凡"發(fā)展到"亂象叢生"。我國2015年的《刑法修正案(九)》以及2016年11月正式實施的《律師事務所管理辦法》和《律師執(zhí)業(yè)管理辦法》呈現(xiàn)出國家對律師網絡言論嚴格規(guī)制的特點,伴隨而來的是相關部門對律師管理權力的強化和干預措施的前置,對走入自媒體時代的中國,這不失為國家的理性選擇,具有確立言論自由限度、預防律師職業(yè)風險以及維護司法公信力的正當意義。但在自媒體時代,法令應當維護律師網絡言論的合理性并且確立網絡言論規(guī)制的限度,警惕缺乏寬容的網絡言論規(guī)制政策借助法律修訂之名進一步擴張,否則會將律師網絡言論限制在一個相對狹小的領域甚至讓其"噤聲",引發(fā)不必要的法治風險。我國未來律師網絡言論規(guī)制之路,應當超越"規(guī)制"走向"治理",既注重律師網絡言論的"治",更要遵循律師網絡言論的規(guī)律而"理"。具體說來,借助互聯(lián)網思維,認清律師網絡言論可信度高和影響力大、單向性與片面性以及價值雙面性等特點,將對互聯(lián)網技術的寬容精神應用到律師網絡言論治理;在法理方面,在區(qū)分律師網絡言論不同類型的基礎上,著重合理平衡言論自由與司法秩序之間的關系;在社會規(guī)則領域,尋求法律與其他規(guī)范整體性和體系性的整合應對,著重加強律師網絡職業(yè)倫理規(guī)則的建設。
[Abstract]:As a form of out-of-court speech, In recent years, lawyers' online speech has developed from "raging" to "chaos". The Criminal Law Amendment (9) in 2015 and the measures for the Administration of Law firms (November 2016) and the Office of practice Administration of lawyers (Office of the Administration of lawyers' practice) were put into effect in November 2016. The law shows the characteristics of strict regulation of lawyers' online speech by the state. Accompanied by the relevant departments to strengthen the power of lawyers management and intervention measures in front of China into the media era, this is the rational choice of the country, with the establishment of freedom of speech limits, But in the era of media, the law should maintain the rationality of lawyers' online speech and establish the limits of the regulation of online speech. Alert to the lack of tolerance of the network speech regulation policy with the name of legal revision to further expand, Otherwise, the lawyer's online speech will be confined to a relatively narrow field or even "silenced", causing unnecessary risks of the rule of law. We should go beyond "regulation" to "governance", not only pay attention to the "governance" of lawyers' online speech, but also follow the law of lawyers' online speech and "reason". Specifically, with the help of Internet thinking, we should recognize that lawyers' online speech has high credibility and great influence. Unidirectional and one-sidedness as well as value and other characteristics, the tolerant spirit of Internet technology is applied to lawyers' network speech governance, in legal theory, on the basis of distinguishing different types of lawyers' online speech, Emphasis is placed on balancing the relationship between freedom of speech and judicial order, seeking the integration of law and other norms in the field of social rules, and strengthening the construction of professional ethics rules of lawyers' network.
【作者單位】： 重慶郵電大學網絡空間安全與信息法學院;
【基金】：國家社會科學基金項目(12XFXO19)
【分類號】：D926.5

【相似文獻】

相關期刊論文 前1條

1 張永誼;;網絡,并非法律的“真空”地帶[J];群言;2012年01期

相關重要報紙文章 前2條

1 賀衛(wèi)方;網絡言論與監(jiān)督司法[N];法制日報;2005年

2 吳蘭友;“IP地址做被告”應是好消息[N];人民法院報;2011年

，

本文編號：1549998