發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-02-23 20:47

  本文關(guān)鍵詞： 審判權(quán)獨(dú)立 法院 法官 憲法第126條　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國憲法第一百二十六條規(guī)定,人民法院依照法律規(guī)定獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán),不受行政機(jī)關(guān)、社會(huì)團(tuán)體和個(gè)人的干涉。這從憲法的高度規(guī)定了我國審判權(quán)獨(dú)立的原則。目前,我國審判權(quán)獨(dú)立得到了社會(huì)越來越廣泛的承認(rèn)和支持,但由于體制、制度、管理等諸多方面的原因,我國法院在依法行使審判權(quán)時(shí),往往受到多方干擾,無法獨(dú)立審判。如何在現(xiàn)行體制下實(shí)現(xiàn)中國特色的審判權(quán)獨(dú)立,已經(jīng)成為重大而迫切的理論命題。鑒于此,本文作者結(jié)合工作實(shí)際,從審判權(quán)獨(dú)立的歷史分析入手,結(jié)合對(duì)憲法第一百二十六條的深入理解和剖析,著重從兩個(gè)方面深刻分析了影響我國審判權(quán)獨(dú)立的各種因素,并有針對(duì)性的提出了完善我國審判權(quán)獨(dú)立的建議。文章認(rèn)為,要實(shí)現(xiàn)我國審判權(quán)獨(dú)立不能滿足于對(duì)現(xiàn)有制度的修修補(bǔ)補(bǔ),而應(yīng)從理順與黨委人大以及上下級(jí)法院的關(guān)系、完善法院內(nèi)部機(jī)制、保障法官的身份和地位等方面,增強(qiáng)法院對(duì)各種外力的抗干擾能力。唯有如此,中國特色審判權(quán)獨(dú)立才能真正實(shí)現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:Article 126th of our Constitution stipulates that the people's courts shall independently exercise judicial power in accordance with the provisions of the law and shall not be interfered with by administrative organs, social organizations and individuals. This provides from the height of the Constitution the principle of the independence of judicial power in China. At present, The independence of judicial power in our country has been more and more widely recognized and supported by the society. However, because of the system, system, management and many other reasons, the courts of our country are often interfered with in the exercise of judicial power according to law. How to realize the independence of judicial power with Chinese characteristics under the current system has become an important and urgent theoretical proposition. Combined with the in-depth understanding and analysis of Article 126th of the Constitution, this paper analyzes the various factors that affect the independence of the judicial power in China from two aspects, and puts forward some suggestions to improve the independence of the judicial power in China. In order to realize the independence of judicial power in our country, we should not be satisfied with the tinkering of the existing system, but should straighten out the relationship with the Party committees, the people's congresses and the upper and lower courts, perfect the internal mechanism of the courts, and safeguard the status and status of the judges. Only in this way can the independence of judicial power with Chinese characteristics be realized.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖建國,肖建光;審判委員會(huì)制度考——兼論取消審判委員會(huì)制度的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)[J];北京科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2002年03期

2 李黎明;;略論西方國家的司法獨(dú)立[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2011年01期

3 范進(jìn)學(xué);;人民法院的“審判權(quán)”是否蘊(yùn)涵著憲法解釋權(quán)[J];法律方法;2008年00期

4 余為青;取消審判委員會(huì)勢在必行[J];阜陽師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2000年02期

5 衛(wèi)睿博;;芻議實(shí)現(xiàn)我國審判獨(dú)立的障礙分析及改革方向[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年03期

6 周永坤;關(guān)于修改憲法第126條的建議[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2004年01期

7 宮澎;從現(xiàn)行審判運(yùn)行機(jī)制存在的缺陷談對(duì)完善合議制度的認(rèn)識(shí)[J];河北法學(xué);2002年03期

8 王濟(jì)東;試述司法權(quán)力的正當(dāng)行使[J];江西社會(huì)科學(xué);2004年02期

9 梁薇;;西方法官制度對(duì)我國法官獨(dú)立的啟示[J];昆明大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2006年01期

10 胡朝欽;;論人民法院獨(dú)立行使審判權(quán)的完善與保障[J];企業(yè)家天地下半月刊(理論版);2008年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1527558