本文關(guān)鍵詞： 委托人利益 信息不對(duì)稱 適度管制　出處：《山東大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國(guó)自1979年恢復(fù)現(xiàn)代律師制度以來(lái),律師市場(chǎng)經(jīng)過(guò)了三十多年的發(fā)展完善。律師的職業(yè)定位也向西方發(fā)達(dá)國(guó)家的律師制度逐步靠近：即將律師定位為自由職業(yè)者,律師以自己的專業(yè)知識(shí)、技能為委托人進(jìn)行辯護(hù),委托人也愿意讓律師作為其權(quán)利的保護(hù)者。隨著兩者關(guān)系的拉近,如何有效維持這種契約關(guān)系?有一個(gè)基本問(wèn)題需要注意,那就是存續(xù)期間的信息交流。由于信息不對(duì)稱現(xiàn)象的存在,而律師又占據(jù)著相對(duì)的信息優(yōu)勢(shì),因此,從法律角度對(duì)律師承擔(dān)的信息披露義務(wù)進(jìn)行適度規(guī)制,對(duì)于維持兩者之間的信賴關(guān)系具有重要的意義。本文主要分析國(guó)家對(duì)律師披露義務(wù)進(jìn)行適度管制的原因,并就管制的原則和程度進(jìn)行介紹,最后,從主觀和客觀方面對(duì)我國(guó)的律師信息披露義務(wù)規(guī)則的完善提出了建議。 本文包括引言、正文和結(jié)論,其中正文分為四章： 第一章對(duì)本文的研究范圍進(jìn)行界定,將本文的研究范圍限定在律師與委托人的契約關(guān)系上,首先,從歷史角度介紹了律師在代理中的不同角色定位,并對(duì)現(xiàn)在律師維護(hù)委托人利益的首要義務(wù)進(jìn)行了論述,接著分析律師在這種契約關(guān)系中的地位和作用,以及其對(duì)律師信息披露義務(wù)的影響。 第二章從內(nèi)外因上分析律師之所以要向委托人承擔(dān)信息披露義務(wù)的原因。從外因上看,天然的信息不對(duì)稱容易造成逆向選擇和道德風(fēng)險(xiǎn)問(wèn)題的出現(xiàn)；從內(nèi)因上看,利益沖突是律師執(zhí)業(yè)過(guò)程中必須面對(duì)的問(wèn)題,也是律師有時(shí)不愿意進(jìn)行信息披露的原因所在。因此,必須強(qiáng)調(diào)律師對(duì)信息披露義務(wù)的承擔(dān)。 第三章是本文論述的重點(diǎn)。律師與委托人之間的法律服務(wù)除了具有商品屬性外,還具有公共屬性,得出國(guó)家必須對(duì)律師的信息披露義務(wù)進(jìn)行適度規(guī)制的結(jié)論。接下來(lái),側(cè)重介紹了律師進(jìn)行信息披露應(yīng)遵守的原則和程度,并結(jié)合代理過(guò)程中的具體情形提出了影響信息披露的綜合因素。 第四章是對(duì)我國(guó)相關(guān)制度的完善進(jìn)行介紹,從實(shí)證的角度分析我國(guó)該制度的發(fā)展情況及現(xiàn)存問(wèn)題,著重分析問(wèn)題產(chǎn)生的原因,指出我國(guó)律師市場(chǎng)在職業(yè)道德教育、市場(chǎng)環(huán)境以及監(jiān)管機(jī)制上的缺陷。前面三章的分析為我國(guó)律師對(duì)委托人信息披露制度的完善提供了思路,并結(jié)合美國(guó)在該方面的先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn),提出我國(guó)律師向委托人信息披露制度完善過(guò)程中應(yīng)當(dāng)加強(qiáng)的三方面,并就具體制度的完善提出了建議。
[Abstract]:Since the restoration of the modern lawyer system in 1979, the lawyer market has been developed and perfected for more than 30 years, and the professional position of the lawyer is closer to that of the western developed country: that is to say, the lawyer is positioned as a freelance. Lawyers defend their clients with their own expertise and skills, and the client is willing to let them act as protectors of their rights. How can the contractual relationship be maintained effectively as the relationship between the two becomes closer? One basic problem that needs to be noted is the exchange of information over time. Because of the existence of information asymmetries and the fact that lawyers occupy a relative information advantage, From the angle of law, it is of great significance to regulate the information disclosure obligations of lawyers, which is of great significance to maintain the trust relationship between the two. This paper mainly analyzes the reasons why the state regulates the disclosure obligations of lawyers moderately. Finally, the author puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the rules of lawyer's information disclosure obligation from subjective and objective aspects. This paper includes an introduction, a text and a conclusion, in which the text is divided into four chapters:. The first chapter defines the scope of this study, limits the scope of this study to the contractual relationship between lawyers and clients. First, it introduces the different roles of lawyers in the representation from the historical point of view. It also discusses the primary obligation of lawyers to protect the interests of clients, and then analyzes the position and role of lawyers in this contractual relationship, and its impact on lawyers' obligation to disclose information. The second chapter analyzes the reasons why lawyers should assume the obligation of information disclosure to their clients from both internal and external causes. From the external perspective, natural information asymmetry can easily lead to adverse selection and the emergence of moral hazard problems; from the perspective of internal reasons, Conflict of interest is a problem that lawyers must face in the process of practicing, and it is also the reason why lawyers are unwilling to disclose information sometimes. Therefore, it is necessary to emphasize the commitment of lawyers to the obligation of information disclosure. The third chapter is the focus of this paper. The legal service between lawyer and client has not only commodity attribute, but also public attribute. The conclusion is that the country must regulate the lawyer's information disclosure duty moderately. This paper mainly introduces the principle and degree that lawyers should abide by in information disclosure, and puts forward the comprehensive factors that affect information disclosure according to the concrete situation in the process of agency. Chapter 4th introduces the perfection of the relevant system in China, analyzes the development of the system and the existing problems from the perspective of empirical analysis, emphatically analyzes the causes of the problems, and points out that the professional ethics education in the lawyers' market in our country. The analysis of the preceding three chapters provides a way of thinking for our lawyers to perfect the client's information disclosure system, and combines the advanced experience of the United States in this field. This paper puts forward three aspects that should be strengthened in the process of perfecting the information disclosure system of lawyer to client in our country, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the specific system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號(hào)】：D926.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫麗英;;淺議律師職業(yè)道德的特殊性——解讀律師職業(yè)道德[J];滄桑;2009年05期

2 蔣堯明,王慶芳;論會(huì)計(jì)信息的商品屬性[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2002年03期

3 王進(jìn)喜;中國(guó)律師職業(yè)道德:歷史回顧與展望[J];中國(guó)司法;2005年02期

4 吳瑞文;;論我國(guó)的律師管理體制及其完善[J];法制與社會(huì);2009年24期

5 蘭榮杰,王囝囝;信息不對(duì)稱:對(duì)律師違法現(xiàn)象的經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)分析及解決之道[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2005年02期

6 韓玉芹;;論“兩結(jié)合”律師管理體制之完善[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

7 徐瑩;;律師執(zhí)業(yè)利益沖突探討[J];河南司法警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2008年01期

8 李鑫;;律師誠(chéng)信問(wèn)題研究[J];科技信息;2009年07期

9 劉納;;論律師的職業(yè)道德[J];遼寧行政學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

10 王健;;《律師制度恢復(fù)30年》專題報(bào)道之三 中國(guó)律師制度的變遷之路[J];民主與法制;2008年19期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 許身健　博士;[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 焦武峰;論法社會(huì)學(xué)視野中的律師角色[D];蘇州大學(xué);2004年

2 朱霆平;律師執(zhí)業(yè)中的利益沖突問(wèn)題研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2006年

3 魏杰;我國(guó)律師職業(yè)道德之問(wèn)題分析與解決路徑[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1518255