本文關(guān)鍵詞： 道德文明秩序 法律文明秩序 調(diào)解 法院調(diào)解運動　出處：《湖南大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：我國正處于社會轉(zhuǎn)型的關(guān)鍵時期,社會糾紛激增,法律界某些學(xué)者試圖以推行“法院調(diào)解運動”的方式來化解糾紛、掩蓋矛盾。 在道德文明秩序下,調(diào)解作為糾紛解決的核心機(jī)制自有其普遍適用的文化肌理。無論是家族調(diào)解、社區(qū)調(diào)解還是官府調(diào)停,調(diào)解人都以權(quán)威的身份對糾紛兩造進(jìn)行帶有強制性的說服、教育,從而達(dá)到息事寧人、維護(hù)秩序的目的。儒家禮教的無訟文化已內(nèi)化為民眾的心理追求,熟人社會下的小農(nóng)經(jīng)濟(jì)要求人們不爭利益、互讓互助,而封建國家為維護(hù)統(tǒng)治秩序,麻痹民眾權(quán)利意識,更是要求社會以妥協(xié)的方式處理糾紛,從而推動了調(diào)解文化數(shù)千年的盛行。 相較于道德文明秩序,法律文明秩序以規(guī)則為中心,以爭取權(quán)利為歸依,規(guī)則的可預(yù)測性適用于市民社會與市場經(jīng)濟(jì),以妥協(xié)和讓利為本質(zhì)的調(diào)解的適用空間受到壓縮。 社會轉(zhuǎn)型時期是由道德文明秩序向法律文明秩序的過度時期,且隨著城市化進(jìn)程的加快,陌生人社會和半熟人社會正日益侵蝕熟人社會的領(lǐng)域,因此調(diào)解的運行空間必定會日益限縮。然而,某些學(xué)者以法院調(diào)解具有審判所不具有的諸如化解上訪、緩解“訴訟爆炸”等功能而大力提倡“法院調(diào)解運動”。事實上,信訪潮的產(chǎn)生自有其深層的原因,并不是法院調(diào)解所能化解的；而所謂的“訴訟爆炸”時代則尚未來臨。推動法院調(diào)解其實是迫于政治壓力而實施的規(guī)避裁判、逃避監(jiān)督及迎合評比的手段。法院調(diào)解運動化會導(dǎo)致消極強制的效果,其產(chǎn)生的影響則是削弱民眾對法律的信仰,阻礙社會主義法治社會的建設(shè)。
[Abstract]:Our country is in the critical period of social transformation, the social dispute is proliferating, some scholars in the legal profession try to resolve the dispute by the way of "court mediation movement" to cover up the contradiction. In the moral and civilized order, mediation as the core mechanism of dispute resolution has its universal cultural texture. Whether it is family mediation, community mediation or government mediation. Mediators all carry on the compulsory persuasion and education to the dispute as authority, so as to achieve the goal of peace and order. The culture of no lawsuit of Confucian etiquette has been internalized as the psychological pursuit of the public. The small peasant economy under the acquaintance society requires that people do not struggle for interests and give each other mutual aid. In order to maintain the ruling order and paralyze the consciousness of people's rights, the feudal country requires the society to deal with disputes in a compromise way. Thus promoting the culture of mediation for thousands of years. Compared with the order of moral civilization, the order of law civilization takes the rule as the center and strives for the right as the dependence. The predictability of the rule is applicable to the civil society and the market economy. The space for mediation, which takes compromise and profit as the essence, is compressed. The period of social transformation is a transitional period from the order of moral civilization to the order of legal civilization, and with the acceleration of urbanization, stranger society and semi-acquaintance society are increasingly eroding the field of acquaintance society. Therefore, the operation space of mediation is bound to be increasingly limited. However, some scholars use court mediation to deal with cases such as resolving petition. To alleviate the function of "lawsuit explosion" and strongly advocate "court mediation movement". In fact, the emergence of petition tide has its own deep reasons, which can not be resolved by court mediation; The so-called "lawsuit explosion" era has not yet arrived. The promotion of court mediation is actually due to political pressure and the implementation of circumvention judgment. The movement of court mediation will lead to negative compulsory effect, which will weaken the people's belief in the law and hinder the construction of the socialist society ruled by law.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D926.2;D922.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉艷芳;;我國古代調(diào)解制度解析[J];安徽大學(xué)學(xué)報;2006年02期

2 徐滌宇;肖陸平;;法院“調(diào)解運動”之反思——基于兩種文明秩序的視角[J];法學(xué)雜志;2011年02期

3 范愉;;行政調(diào)解問題芻議[J];廣東社會科學(xué);2008年06期

4 曾建明,黃偉明;回顧與展望──論完善我國的人民調(diào)解制度[J];中央政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年01期

5 張保利;石林;;法院調(diào)解的回歸與發(fā)展路徑解析——永登縣人民法院調(diào)解工作引發(fā)的思考[J];西部法學(xué)評論;2009年05期

6 周永坤;;警惕調(diào)解的濫用和強制趨勢[J];河北學(xué)刊;2006年06期

7 周安平;;訴訟調(diào)解與法治理念的悖論[J];河北學(xué)刊;2006年06期

8 范愉;;調(diào)解年與調(diào)解運動[J];河南社會科學(xué);2010年01期

9 辛國清;;美國法院附設(shè)ADR研究[J];社會科學(xué)研究;2006年06期

10 胡旭晟,夏新華;中國調(diào)解傳統(tǒng)研究──一種文化的透視[J];河南省政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2000年04期

，

本文編號：1486725