本文關(guān)鍵詞： 律師 介入 偵查階段 訴訟權(quán)利　出處：《湘潭大學(xué)》2011年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：在刑事訴訟法中保障犯罪嫌疑人人權(quán)的措施非常重要的一項(xiàng)就是律師在偵查階段介入行使權(quán)力對犯罪嫌疑人提供幫助。在偵查階段律師加強(qiáng)辯護(hù)職能介入,為犯罪嫌疑人提供有效法律幫助,能進(jìn)一步監(jiān)督偵查權(quán)合法行使,從而達(dá)到刑事訴訟構(gòu)造平衡的良好狀態(tài)。目前我國刑事訴訟法律制度規(guī)定：在偵查階段犯罪嫌疑人可以聘請律師,受委托的律師有權(quán)會(huì)見在押的犯罪嫌疑人,了解案件情況；向偵查機(jī)關(guān)了解涉嫌的罪名；提供法律咨詢；代理提出申訴、控告；為被逮捕的犯罪嫌疑人申請取保候?qū)�。這是我國刑事訴訟立法的進(jìn)步,但是我們發(fā)現(xiàn)在立法層面上存在的問題還是非常多,而在司法實(shí)踐中律師偵查階段訴訟權(quán)利的行使仍然是非常艱難。 本文以A市實(shí)際情況為例,圍繞律師在偵查階段行使訴訟權(quán)利進(jìn)行論述。首先列舉了A市律師在偵查階段訴訟權(quán)利的適用的基本情況及主要特點(diǎn),然后指出權(quán)利適用中存在的主要問題,包括偵查機(jī)關(guān)不能很好的履行告知義務(wù)、犯罪嫌疑人委托律師難、律師會(huì)見犯罪嫌疑人難、律師與偵查機(jī)關(guān)辦案人員交流難。并對其進(jìn)行了主要原因的分析,其中有主觀原因包括思想觀念上存在某些誤區(qū)以及偵查機(jī)關(guān)辦案人員和律師的整體素質(zhì)都有待提高,客觀原因包括法律條款中訴訟權(quán)利內(nèi)容還不夠完善、偵查過程缺乏有效監(jiān)督、偵查機(jī)關(guān)過分依賴口供以及配套制度不完善。最后提出相應(yīng)的對策和建議,完善立法、完善與建立配套制度和規(guī)則,如：完善監(jiān)督機(jī)制、建立偵查階段的司法審查制度、建立嚴(yán)格的非法言辭證據(jù)排除規(guī)則、完善監(jiān)管制度、建立偵查階段的律師援助制度,以及法律工作者轉(zhuǎn)變觀念提高素質(zhì)。
[Abstract]:One of the most important measures to protect the human rights of criminal suspects in the criminal procedure law is that lawyers intervene in the investigation stage and exercise their power to help the criminal suspects. In the investigation stage, lawyers strengthen the intervention of defense functions. To provide effective legal assistance to criminal suspects and to further supervise the lawful exercise of the investigation power. In order to achieve a good balance of criminal procedure structure. At present, our country's criminal procedure legal system stipulates: in the investigation stage, the suspect can hire a lawyer, the entrusted lawyer has the right to meet the criminal suspects in custody. Information on cases; To inquire of the investigating organs about the suspected charges; Provision of legal advice; To lodge a complaint or complaint on behalf of a person; This is the progress of criminal procedure legislation in China, but we find that there are still many problems in the legislative level. In judicial practice, the exercise of litigation rights is still very difficult. This paper takes the actual situation of A city as an example, discusses the lawyer's exercising the litigation right in the investigation stage. Firstly, it lists the basic situation and main characteristics of the application of the lawsuit right of the A city lawyer in the investigation stage. Then points out the main problems existing in the application of the right, including the investigation organs can not perform the obligation of informing, the suspect is difficult to entrust lawyers, lawyers to meet the criminal suspects difficult. It is difficult for lawyers and investigators to communicate with each other, and the main reasons are analyzed. There are some subjective reasons including the existence of some misconceptions in ideology and the overall quality of investigators and lawyers are to be improved objective reasons including legal provisions in the content of litigation rights is not perfect. The investigation process is short of effective supervision, the investigation organs rely too much on confession and the supporting system is not perfect. Finally, the corresponding countermeasures and suggestions are put forward to perfect the legislation, perfect and establish the supporting system and rules. Such as: perfect the supervision mechanism, establish the judicial review system in the investigation stage, establish strict rules of excluding the illegal verbal evidence, perfect the supervision system, and establish the lawyer assistance system in the investigation stage. And legal workers change their ideas to improve their quality.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湘潭大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2011
【分類號】：D925.2;D926.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 馮濤;律師介入偵查階段的困境與出路[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年02期

2 侯U，

本文編號：1457377