發(fā)布時間：2018-01-06 14:23

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：論標準化審判　出處：《華南理工大學》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 標準化 標準化審判 法官自由裁量權(quán)

【摘要】：目前的審判方式受我國傳統(tǒng)文化中的親情人情因素影響太重，在實行市場經(jīng)濟的今天仍然十分嚴重，司法最怕的就是“關(guān)系”之風，只有改變法律的運作機制和在制度上限止法官過度的濫用權(quán)力，才能阻止和消滅這股不正之風。既要有效限制法官個人自由裁量權(quán)的過度濫用，又不能過度的干涉將法官徹底束縛而不能秉持公平、正義的理念辦案。推行“標準化辦案”彌補了法律的滯后性同時統(tǒng)一了裁判尺度，為法官斷案提供了“標準化處方”。文中將“標準化辦案”界定為法院系統(tǒng)視野下的審判方式，即標準化審判。 因此，本文首先在司法領(lǐng)域，法院系統(tǒng)視野下，運用概念法學的方法，從標準化的概念及特征出發(fā)，，及國外法院標準化管理的運行趨勢的把握，界定了標準化審判的概念及特征；其次，從法學界理論研究者與司法實務工作者對于標準化審判的不同觀點，運用比較分析的方法，分析這兩類觀點，接著又從實踐層面分析已推行標準化審判的法院的做法與收獲，更進一步體現(xiàn)出推行標準化審判的必要性和可行性，最后概括提出了在推行標準化審判時法院應該注意的幾點問題。本文的創(chuàng)新之處在于，對標準化審判的必要性和可行性進行了詳細論證。通過比較分析的方法，提出標準化審判的法理兼容性與司法權(quán)的博弈，通過中基層法院與實踐中法院已有的“標準化辦案”來論證標準化審判的必要性和可行性。進一步推動國內(nèi)司法改革新局面，真正實現(xiàn)司法公平、公正、效率的司法目標。
[Abstract]:The current trial is affected by the affection of human factors in the traditional culture of our country is too heavy, in a market economy today is still very serious, is "relationship" justice most afraid of the wind, only to change the operation mechanism of law and in the system to judge the excessive abuse of power, to prevent and eliminate the unwholesome tendencies. Excessive abuse should effectively restrain the judge's discretion, but not excessive interference will not completely bound judges uphold fairness and justice, the implementation of the "standard of handling cases." make up the lag of law unified the referee scale at the same time, provides a "standard prescription" for the judge. The "standard case" is defined as the court system from the perspective of trial mode, namely the standardization of the trial.
Therefore, this paper firstly in the field of justice, the court system perspective, using the method of the concept of law, starting from the concept and characteristics of the standardized operation, and the trend of foreign court standardization management to grasp the concept and characteristics of the standard of justice; secondly, different from the point of view of theoretical research and judicial practice workers law for the standardization of the trial, using comparative analysis method, analysis of these two kinds of views, the practice of the court and then harvested from the practical level analysis has been carried out standardization trial, further reflects the necessity and feasibility of the implementation of standardized trial, finally some problems in the implementation of the trial court should be standardized note the summary is proposed. The innovation of this paper is the necessity and feasibility of standardization trial are studied in detail. Through comparative analysis, put forward the legal standard of judgment The game between compatibility and judicial power demonstrates the necessity and feasibility of standardized trial through the existing standardized cases in basic courts and in practice. It further promotes the new phase of domestic judicial reform and truly achieves the judicial goal of judicial fairness, fairness and efficiency.

【學位授予單位】：華南理工大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：D926.2

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 張榕;;事實認定中的法官自由裁量權(quán)[J];法律科學(西北政法大學學報);2009年04期

2 耿建新;肖振東;;ISO14000認證出口效應研究——基于中國資本市場的經(jīng)驗證據(jù)[J];中國軟科學;2006年01期

本文編號：1388247