本文關(guān)鍵詞：綜合配套改革試驗區(qū)“先行先試”政策的司法回應(yīng)　出處：《山西大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： “先行先試 綜合配套改革試驗區(qū) 政策 司法回應(yīng)

【摘要】：綜合配套改革試驗區(qū)“先行先試”,是指國家批準(zhǔn)設(shè)立的11個綜合配套改革試驗區(qū)根據(jù)改革的新動向、新形勢率先進(jìn)行配套改革試驗和立法嘗試,并為其他地區(qū)提供改革創(chuàng)新的范式。“先行先試”政策的實施能夠極大地促進(jìn)地方經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展,并推動中國社會的轉(zhuǎn)型發(fā)展。然而,“先行先試”政策在推行的過程中,各主體為獲取更多的利益,展開激烈了的爭奪,大量的矛盾和糾紛產(chǎn)生,這些問題如果得不到合理有效的解決,將嚴(yán)重制約改革的進(jìn)程。因此,在立法不完善的情況下,研究司法上如何回應(yīng)“先行先試”政策,為試驗區(qū)的改革提供法律層面的救濟(jì)和保障就顯得尤為重要。本文運用文獻(xiàn)分析的方法,從“先行先試”的含義、特征等基本問題入手,通過運用實證分析的方法,歸納出司法回應(yīng)政策在不同的發(fā)展階段應(yīng)堅持的基本理念和司法回應(yīng)政策的基本模式,并運用價值分析的方法,分析了司法回應(yīng)“先行先試”政策的價值和局限性,同時對司法回應(yīng)“先行先試”進(jìn)行了理性構(gòu)建。本文共分為四大部分：第一部分是對相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行解析。該部分首先對“先行先試”一詞的由來、含義及特征進(jìn)行了分析,然后又分別對“司法”以及“司法回應(yīng)政策”的含義進(jìn)行了界定。第二部分是對司法回應(yīng)政策進(jìn)行實證分析。該部分首先對司法回應(yīng)政策的理念進(jìn)行了研究,歸納出司法回應(yīng)政策應(yīng)堅持的四個基本理念為分別為貫徹政策理念,協(xié)助政策落實理念,全面實施改革政策理念和全力保障發(fā)展大局理念；其次對司法回應(yīng)政策的模式進(jìn)行了研究,歸納出司法回應(yīng)政策應(yīng)堅持的四個基本模式分別為作為準(zhǔn)法源適用模式,轉(zhuǎn)化為司法解釋模式,轉(zhuǎn)化為司法性文件模式和轉(zhuǎn)化為個案裁判考量因素模式。第三部分是對司法回應(yīng)“先行先試”政策進(jìn)行理論分析。該部分首先對司法回應(yīng)“先行先試”政策的必然性和正當(dāng)性進(jìn)行了分析；然后對司法回應(yīng)“先行先試”政策的價值和局限性進(jìn)行了分析。第四部分是本文的措施部分,是對司法回應(yīng)“先行先試”政策進(jìn)行理性建構(gòu)。該部分所進(jìn)行的理性建構(gòu)主要圍繞三方面展開：第一,司法回應(yīng)“先行先試”政策的基本原則；第二,司法回應(yīng)“先行先試”政策的程序和標(biāo)準(zhǔn)設(shè)置；第三,個案回應(yīng)“先行先試”政策遵循指導(dǎo)性案例制度�？偠灾�,本文通過對綜合配套改試驗區(qū)“先行先試”政策的司法回應(yīng)進(jìn)行研究,力圖為實踐中司法回應(yīng)“先行先試”政策提供一些有意義的建議,從而為“先行先試”的實施提供司法保障和法律上的支持,進(jìn)而推動綜合配套改革的合法、規(guī)范與順利進(jìn)行。
[Abstract]:According to the new trend of reform, the "first first trial" of the comprehensive supporting reform experimental area refers to the 11 comprehensive supporting reform experimental zones approved by the state, which, according to the new trend of reform, take the lead in carrying out the supporting reform experiments and legislative attempts in the new situation. And for other regions to provide a paradigm for reform and innovation. The implementation of the "first try" policy can greatly promote the development of local economy and promote the transformation and development of Chinese society. In the process of implementation of the "first trial" policy, the main bodies in order to obtain more interests, launched fierce competition, a large number of contradictions and disputes, if these problems can not be solved reasonably and effectively. It will seriously restrict the process of reform. Therefore, in the case of imperfect legislation, how to respond to the "first try" policy in the judicial system is studied. It is particularly important to provide legal relief and guarantee for the reform of the experimental area. This paper uses the method of literature analysis to start with the meaning and characteristics of "first try first". By using the method of empirical analysis, this paper sums up the basic concept of judicial response policy in different stages of development and the basic mode of judicial response policy, and applies the method of value analysis. This paper analyzes the value and limitation of the policy of "first trial" in judicial response. This paper is divided into four parts: the first part is the analysis of the related concepts. This part first gives the origin of the word "first try". The meaning and characteristics are analyzed. Then it defines the meaning of "judicature" and "judicial response policy" respectively. The second part is the empirical analysis of judicial response policy. This part first studies the concept of judicial response policy. The four basic concepts of judicial response policy are summarized as follows: to carry out the policy idea, to assist the policy implementation idea, to implement the reform policy idea and to ensure the overall development. Secondly, the model of judicial response policy is studied, and the four basic models of judicial response policy should be concluded as the quasi-legal source of application model, transformed into the judicial interpretation model. The third part is the theoretical analysis of judicial response "first try" policy. The first part of the judicial response "first try". The inevitability and legitimacy of the policy are analyzed. Then the author analyzes the value and limitation of the "first trial" policy of judicial response. Part 4th is the measure part of this article. This part mainly focuses on three aspects: first, the basic principle of judicial response "first trial" policy; Second, the procedure and standard setting of the policy of "trial first"; Third, the case response "first first trial" policy follows the guiding case system. In a word, this paper studies the judicial response of the "first first trial" policy in the comprehensive matching reform pilot area. This paper tries to provide some meaningful suggestions for the judicial response to the "first trial" policy in practice, so as to provide judicial protection and legal support for the implementation of "first trial", and then to promote the legitimacy of comprehensive supporting reform. Standardization and smooth progress.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山西大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 肖明;;“先行先試”應(yīng)符合法治原則——從某些行政區(qū)域的“促進(jìn)改革條例”說起[J];法學(xué);2009年10期

2 施紅星;方志耕;阮愛清;;國家綜合配套改革試驗區(qū)改革的系統(tǒng)設(shè)計[J];開放導(dǎo)報;2007年02期

3 劉思萱;;論政策的司法回應(yīng)——以1979年以來我國企業(yè)改革政策為例[J];社會科學(xué);2012年04期

，

本文編號：1386636