本文關(guān)鍵詞：我國(guó)司法解釋的規(guī)范化問(wèn)題研究　出處：《遼寧大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

  更多相關(guān)文章： 司法解釋 規(guī)范化 抽象性司法解釋 監(jiān)督機(jī)制

【摘要】：司法解釋是法律解釋的一種，是最高司法機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)法律的具體適用所做的解釋，司法解釋規(guī)范化是對(duì)司法解釋的主體、權(quán)限、程序等進(jìn)行的規(guī)制。在當(dāng)代社會(huì)，司法解釋發(fā)揮著不可小覷的作用，建國(guó)以來(lái),“宜粗不宜細(xì)”的立法政策和成文法固有的僵硬性與滯后性，使得司法解釋在我國(guó)的存在成為必然，且發(fā)揮著彌補(bǔ)立法不足，填補(bǔ)法律漏洞的重要意義，在實(shí)踐中，司法解釋是法官正確應(yīng)用法律審判案件的依據(jù)，是當(dāng)事人維護(hù)權(quán)益的手段，是解決社會(huì)矛盾和糾紛的工具，是實(shí)現(xiàn)法治統(tǒng)一的保障，司法解釋有著這么重要的意義，我們應(yīng)當(dāng)充分發(fā)揮其應(yīng)有的功效，保證司法解釋對(duì)于調(diào)整社會(huì)關(guān)系，緩解社會(huì)矛盾，維護(hù)社會(huì)和諧穩(wěn)定發(fā)揮其特有的作用，然而，目前我國(guó)司法解釋卻存在著很多不規(guī)范的現(xiàn)象，，亟待我們加以研究解決。 本文在簡(jiǎn)要的介紹了司法解釋規(guī)范化的重要意義和理論基礎(chǔ)后，對(duì)我國(guó)現(xiàn)行司法解釋的現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行分析，總結(jié)出了現(xiàn)行司法解釋存在的一些不規(guī)范現(xiàn)象，如立法關(guān)于司法解釋工作的規(guī)定不健全、司法解釋呈現(xiàn)泛濫化和立法化的趨勢(shì)、“兩高”司法解釋的內(nèi)容和效力沖突、司法解釋制定和發(fā)布程序不規(guī)范以及司法解釋的監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制缺乏等等，并對(duì)這些不規(guī)范現(xiàn)象的成因進(jìn)行分析，總結(jié)出為什么我國(guó)司法解釋會(huì)出現(xiàn)這些不規(guī)范的現(xiàn)象，“兩高”的解釋權(quán)限界定不清使得兩機(jī)關(guān)的解釋內(nèi)容和效力發(fā)生沖突、“宜粗不宜細(xì)”的立法政策決定了司法解釋必然出現(xiàn)立法化的趨勢(shì)、立法和監(jiān)督機(jī)制的不完善使得司法解釋的制定和發(fā)布程序不規(guī)范且出現(xiàn)泛濫化的趨勢(shì)等等，進(jìn)而對(duì)我國(guó)司法解釋規(guī)范化提出了一些自己的見(jiàn)解，首先，在立法方面，建議制定一部專門的《司法解釋法》，以立法的高度對(duì)司法解釋的制定主體、權(quán)限、程序、范圍、監(jiān)督等進(jìn)行全面而詳盡的規(guī)定，其次，專門論述了司法解釋的監(jiān)督制約機(jī)制，明確全國(guó)人民代表大會(huì)常務(wù)委員會(huì)為司法解釋的監(jiān)督機(jī)關(guān)，同時(shí)要加強(qiáng)社會(huì)監(jiān)督，利用現(xiàn)代信息技術(shù)網(wǎng)絡(luò)加強(qiáng)對(duì)司法解釋的有效監(jiān)督，使司法解釋能夠越來(lái)越規(guī)范，進(jìn)而促使我國(guó)法治能夠更好的實(shí)現(xiàn)公平。
[Abstract]:The judicial interpretation is a legal interpretation of the specific application, is the highest judicial organ of the law the interpretation of judicial interpretation is the standardized permissions on the subject, the judicial interpretation of the procedures for the regulation. In contemporary society, plays an important role in judicial interpretation, since 1949, the rigidity and hysteresis of coarse "legislative policy and statute law inherent, making the judicial interpretation inevitably exists in our country, and plays an important significance to make up for the lack of legislation, to fill loopholes in the law, in practice, the judicial interpretation is the correct application of the law a trial basis, is the means to safeguard the rights and interests, is to solve the problem social conflicts and disputes, is the realization of the unified legal system guarantee, has such an important significance of judicial interpretation, we should give full play to its due effect, ensure the judicial interpretation to adjust social relations, To alleviate social contradictions and maintain social harmony and stability, it plays a unique role. However, at present, there are many irregular phenomena in our judicial interpretation, which urgently need us to study and solve.
This paper briefly introduces the significance and theoretical basis of the standardization of the judicial interpretation, the status quo of China's current judicial interpretation of the analysis, summed up the current judicial interpretation of some non-standard phenomena, such as the legislation on judicial interpretation of the provisions is not perfect, explain the present flood and the trend of the legislation of company law the content and effect of the conflict, judicial interpretation, judicial interpretations formulated and promulgated procedures are not standardized and the supervision and restriction mechanism of the lack of judicial interpretation and so on, and the causes of these abnormal phenomena are analyzed, summarized why China's judicial interpretation will appear the phenomenon of non-standard "high" interpretation authority is not defined the two clear agency's interpretation content and effect of the conflict, "the legislative policy should be detailed" determines the judicial interpretation of the inevitable trend of legislation, legislation and supervision The imperfect mechanism makes the judicial interpretations formulated and promulgated procedures are not standardized and flood trend and so on, and then to the standardization and puts forward some opinions of China's judicial interpretation, first of all, in the aspect of legislation, propose a special "judicial interpretation method", with the height of the legislative body, making the judicial interpretation of the authority, scope, procedures, supervision and conduct a comprehensive and detailed provisions, secondly, discusses the judicial interpretation of supervision and restriction mechanism, clear the National People's Congress Standing Committee for the supervision of judicial interpretation, at the same time, to strengthen social supervision, strengthen the effective supervision of the judicial interpretation of the use of modern information technology network. The judicial interpretation will become increasingly standardized, and promote the rule of law in our country can achieve better fairness.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：遼寧大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D926

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張榕;;司法能動(dòng)性何以實(shí)現(xiàn)?——以最高人民法院司法解釋為分析基礎(chǔ)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年05期

2 田芳;;法律解釋如何統(tǒng)一——關(guān)于司法解釋權(quán)的法律統(tǒng)一解釋功能的思考[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年06期

3 張新寶;王偉國(guó);;最高人民法院民商事司法解釋溯及力問(wèn)題探討[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2010年06期

4 袁明圣;司法解釋“立法化”現(xiàn)象探微[J];法商研究;2003年02期

5 陳新民;;論中央與地方法律關(guān)系的變革[J];法學(xué);2007年05期

6 張勇;;規(guī)范性司法解釋在法律體系實(shí)施中的責(zé)任和使命[J];法學(xué);2011年08期

7 李曉霞;;論最高人民法院司法解釋的合法性[J];河北工程大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年03期

8 鄭美慧;;論我國(guó)司法解釋制定主體的現(xiàn)狀與規(guī)范[J];韶關(guān)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2011年07期

9 曹士兵;;最高人民法院裁判、司法解釋的法律地位[J];中國(guó)法學(xué);2006年03期

10 趙春鳳;;從最高人民法院工作報(bào)告看司法解釋[J];國(guó)家檢察官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

本文編號(hào)：1356887