【摘要】：拉德布魯赫是德國(guó)20世紀(jì)最偉大的、影響最為深遠(yuǎn)的法哲學(xué)家和刑法學(xué)家之一。作為新康德主義海德堡學(xué)派在法哲學(xué)領(lǐng)域的重要代表人物，他以新康德主義哲學(xué)為基礎(chǔ)，繼承并發(fā)揚(yáng)新康德主義法學(xué)傳統(tǒng)，開(kāi)拓出相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)思想。拉德布魯赫提出相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)思想的目的在于，克服自然法學(xué)派的絕對(duì)價(jià)值主義的學(xué)派立場(chǎng)，及分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)的絕對(duì)實(shí)證主義的學(xué)派立場(chǎng)，進(jìn)而，探索出一條走向和解與寬容的法哲學(xué)路徑。但是，拉德布魯赫對(duì)傳統(tǒng)法哲學(xué)理論進(jìn)行革新的學(xué)術(shù)努力，似乎并未得到應(yīng)有的認(rèn)可，其在二戰(zhàn)前后所顯示的“學(xué)術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)向問(wèn)題”，更引來(lái)許多的議論。有些人認(rèn)為，拉德布魯赫的學(xué)術(shù)努力是對(duì)自然法學(xué)說(shuō)的復(fù)興；有些人則堅(jiān)持認(rèn)為，拉德布魯赫是一貫的和堅(jiān)定的法律實(shí)證主義的擁躉；還有些人認(rèn)為，拉德布魯赫的相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)思想并沒(méi)有貢獻(xiàn)知識(shí)增量，且其法哲學(xué)思想內(nèi)部充滿(mǎn)矛盾，甚至難以自圓其說(shuō)。那么，應(yīng)該怎樣解讀拉德布魯赫相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)思想？拉德布魯赫法哲學(xué)思想的真實(shí)面目是怎樣的？其法哲學(xué)思想的特質(zhì)有哪些？其法哲學(xué)思想的重要意義又有哪些方面？等，文章意圖對(duì)這些問(wèn)題進(jìn)行探討。 文章將從六個(gè)部分，依次展開(kāi)對(duì)相關(guān)問(wèn)題的論述： 引論部分，簡(jiǎn)要地概述文章問(wèn)題意識(shí)的緣起，并對(duì)關(guān)于拉德布魯赫法哲學(xué)思想研究的國(guó)內(nèi)外學(xué)術(shù)狀況，進(jìn)行必要的梳理，提煉出寫(xiě)作文章時(shí)可發(fā)揮的學(xué)術(shù)空間；同時(shí)，對(duì)寫(xiě)作論文的研究方法做出簡(jiǎn)單地說(shuō)明。 第一部分，針對(duì)拉德布魯赫法哲學(xué)思想的理論基礎(chǔ)，進(jìn)行介紹，其中包括兩部分：哲學(xué)基礎(chǔ)和法學(xué)基礎(chǔ)。并據(jù)此指出，其法哲學(xué)思想提出之初，，便以克服法哲學(xué)領(lǐng)域的自然法學(xué)與分析實(shí)證主義法學(xué)之爭(zhēng)，開(kāi)拓法哲學(xué)研究的“第三條路徑”為目的。 第二部分，主要闡述開(kāi)啟拉德布魯赫法哲學(xué)思想的“鑰匙”——相對(duì)主義的法學(xué)方法論。本部分內(nèi)容分為兩個(gè)方面：其一、闡明作為方法論意義上的相對(duì)主義的具體含義；其二、具體分析相對(duì)主義法學(xué)方法論產(chǎn)生的原因，及其所帶來(lái)的重要意義。 第三部分，具體剖析拉德布魯赫法哲學(xué)思想的主要內(nèi)容，具體來(lái)說(shuō)，分為兩個(gè)部分：靜態(tài)分析和動(dòng)態(tài)分析。在靜態(tài)分析部分，集中地對(duì)其法哲學(xué)思想體系進(jìn)行解構(gòu)，對(duì)其法哲學(xué)思想所涉及到的重要概念（包括它們的含義、相互關(guān)系等）進(jìn)行厘析，從而，揭示拉德布魯赫法哲學(xué)思想的內(nèi)在張力與和諧；在動(dòng)態(tài)分析部分，將主要針對(duì)所謂的“拉德布魯赫法哲學(xué)思想轉(zhuǎn)向問(wèn)題“進(jìn)行深入解讀。通過(guò)比較分析得出，在二戰(zhàn)前后，拉德布魯赫法哲學(xué)思想實(shí)際上呈現(xiàn)出一致性與變革性相統(tǒng)一的重要特點(diǎn)。進(jìn)而，指出其所謂的“學(xué)術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)向問(wèn)題”并不存在，“法律的不法”與“超法律的法”的提出，只是實(shí)踐其理論的一種表現(xiàn)，和其“三元法哲學(xué)“體系話(huà)語(yǔ)的另一種展示。 第四部分，承接著第三部分，進(jìn)一步地闡述拉德布魯赫法哲學(xué)思想的特質(zhì)，并在此基礎(chǔ)上，指出其法哲學(xué)思想給人們帶來(lái)的啟示，即重要的理論意義與實(shí)踐意義。首先，指出拉德布魯赫法哲學(xué)思想作為一種相對(duì)主義法哲學(xué)，為法哲學(xué)相關(guān)問(wèn)題的研究開(kāi)拓出新視角、新路徑，其思想內(nèi)在地包含著理性思考和寬容精神；且為事實(shí)和價(jià)值間緊張關(guān)系的緩解，提供了一種高明的方法論。其次，將法治國(guó)家建設(shè)的實(shí)踐與拉德布魯赫的法哲學(xué)思想相聯(lián)系，指出其思想在德國(guó)法治國(guó)建設(shè)中所起到的重要作用。 結(jié)語(yǔ)部分，再次檢視本文的寫(xiě)作緣由和意義，對(duì)作者的觀點(diǎn)做進(jìn)一步地強(qiáng)調(diào)。
[Abstract]:Radbroch is one of the greatest and most influential French philosophers and criminal jurists in the 20th century of Germany. As an important representative in the field of law philosophy, the Heidelberg School of the new Kantian doctrine, based on the neo-Kantian philosophy, inherited and developed the tradition of the neo-Kantian theory and opened up the philosophy of relativism. The purpose of Radbroch's philosophy of relativism is to overcome the school's position of the absolute value of the natural law school and to analyze the school's position of the absolute positivism of positivism. But Radbroch's academic efforts to innovate the traditional philosophy of philosophy seem to have not been duly recognized, and the "academic steering" that it had shown before and after the Second World War led to a lot of discussion. Some people believe that the academic efforts of the Radbroch are the revival of the natural law theory; others insist that the Radbroch is a consistent and firm legal positivism, and some believe that, The philosophy of relativism in Radbroch does not contribute to the increment of knowledge, and the interior of his method of law is full of contradictions, and it is even difficult to say. So, how should the philosophy of the Radbrooke's relativism approach be interpreted? What is the true nature of Radbroch's philosophy? What are the characteristics of the philosophy of the law? What is the important meaning of its philosophy of law? The article is intended to explore these problems. The article will, from six parts, expand the theory of the related problems in turn The paper: The introduction part, briefly outlines the origin of the issue consciousness of the article, and makes the necessary research on the academic situation at home and abroad on the study of the Radbroch's philosophy. The academic space that can be played when the article is written, and the research method of the writing paper is simple. The first part, which is based on the theoretical basis of the philosophy of the Radbroch method, includes two parts: the base of philosophy. On the basis of the law, the author points out that, at the beginning of the philosophy of law, it can overcome the dispute between the natural law and the positivism in the field of law philosophy, and explore the "Article 3Path" for the purpose. The second part mainly describes the "key" _ relative principal of the thought of opening the Radbroch's philosophy. The content of this part is divided into two aspects: one is the specific meaning of relativism in the sense of methodology; secondly, the reason of the methodological development of relativism is analyzed in detail, and the result The third part, in particular, analyzes the main contents of the Drouge's philosophy, in particular, it is divided into two parts: The static analysis and dynamic analysis, in the static analysis part, deconstructs the legal philosophy system of the law, and analyses the important concepts involved in the philosophy of the law, including their meaning, mutual relation, etc. In the dynamic analysis part, we will mainly focus on the so-called "On the steering of the radio" is an in-depth interpretation. By means of the comparative analysis, the Radbroch's philosophy of philosophy, before and after the Second World War, is in fact consistent and changing. In addition, it is pointed out that the so-called "academic steering" does not exist, the "the lawlessness of the law" and the "the law of ultra-law" are put forward, but only one of the performance of its theory and its "three-way philosophy" The fourth part, in the third part of the bearing, further expounds the characteristics of the philosophy of the Radbroch's law, and on the basis of this, points out the enlightenment of the philosophy of the law to the people, that is, the weight. In the first part, it is pointed out that the thought of Radbroch's philosophy is a relativism and the study of the related problems of law philosophy has developed a new visual angle and a new path, and its thought inherently contains the spirit of rational thinking and tolerance; and it is the fact and the relationship between the value and the value, This paper provides a good methodology. Secondly, the practice of building the rule of law in the state of the rule of law is in contact with the legal philosophy of the Radbroch, and it is pointed out that the thought of the country is governed by the German law. The important role played in the construction of this paper is to review the reason and meaning of the writing in this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D90

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鈴木敬夫;論自由社會(huì)主義——論拉德布魯赫《社會(huì)主義文化理論》的現(xiàn)代意義[J];比較法研究;2004年05期

2 柯嵐;;告密、良心自由與現(xiàn)代合法性的困境——法哲學(xué)視野中的告密者難題[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2009年06期

3 朱力宇;劉建偉;;新康德主義法學(xué)三論[J];法學(xué)家;2007年05期

4 柯衛(wèi);周超;;論實(shí)證主義法學(xué)關(guān)于法律與道德關(guān)系的自然法化[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2010年01期

5 陳坤;;拉德布魯赫《法律上的人》及其借鑒意義[J];江蘇警官學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

6 朱淑麗;;紐倫堡審判面臨的困境及其解決[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年03期

7 鈴木敬夫;宋海彬;;論人的尊嚴(yán)與死刑廢止——以拉德布魯赫的刑法草案與行刑論為中心[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年04期

8 柯嵐;;拉德布魯赫公式的意義及其在二戰(zhàn)后德國(guó)司法中的運(yùn)用[J];華東政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

9 陳暉;西方法哲學(xué)的現(xiàn)代轉(zhuǎn)型及其發(fā)展[J];蘭州學(xué)刊;2004年04期

10 林海;;哈富論戰(zhàn)、拉德布魯赫公式及納粹法制迷案——從歷史視角透析理論問(wèn)題[J];南京大學(xué)法律評(píng)論;2008年Z1期

本文編號(hào)：2445953