【摘要】： 文章以我國(guó)法律中的數(shù)字規(guī)定為研究對(duì)象,以實(shí)證分析的方法對(duì)我國(guó)法律中的數(shù)字規(guī)定進(jìn)行實(shí)然層面上的考查。文章包括引言與四部分內(nèi)容,通篇以問(wèn)題的形式作為標(biāo)題并且作為文章的邏輯脈絡(luò),而對(duì)這些問(wèn)題的回答即構(gòu)成文章的內(nèi)容。引言部分,交待了文章的寫作目的,即面對(duì)法律中存在大量的數(shù)字規(guī)定,不禁產(chǎn)生為什么規(guī)定、如何規(guī)定……等等的疑問(wèn),出于對(duì)這些疑問(wèn)的解答便有了這篇文章；文章第一部分,通過(guò)歸納、總結(jié)法律中的數(shù)字規(guī)定,從特點(diǎn)、內(nèi)容、類型等方面對(duì)法律中的數(shù)字予以梳理,使“法律中的數(shù)字”以一個(gè)具體、獨(dú)立的形象成為一個(gè)可以單獨(dú)研究的客體；第二部分,第一部分解決了法律中數(shù)字規(guī)定“有”的問(wèn)題,接下來(lái)的疑問(wèn)便是“為什么有?”,即法律中為什么要規(guī)定數(shù)字。本部分從法律的結(jié)構(gòu)、法律的內(nèi)容、法律的實(shí)現(xiàn)三個(gè)方面解釋了法律中規(guī)定數(shù)字是必然的、必須的并且是必要的；第三部分,緊接著一、二部分,回答了法律中的數(shù)字是如何規(guī)定的問(wèn)題,即法律中的數(shù)字的合理性基礎(chǔ)是什么。本部分通過(guò)分析我國(guó)立法、法律修改等過(guò)程中所涉及的數(shù)字條款,總結(jié)出一些數(shù)字條款立與改時(shí)所考慮的因素、依據(jù),并且指出這些依據(jù)也應(yīng)當(dāng)是今后數(shù)字規(guī)定應(yīng)當(dāng)予以考慮的依據(jù)。第四部分結(jié)語(yǔ),將法律中的數(shù)字規(guī)定與公平正義之間的所隔的“窗紙”捅破,指出：事實(shí)上,通篇我們都在圍繞著公平與正義展開：什么是法律中的數(shù)字?能夠體現(xiàn)法律的公平正義的規(guī)定。法律中為什么規(guī)定數(shù)字?因?yàn)榉芍幸?guī)定數(shù)字有利于其公平正義的實(shí)現(xiàn)。法律中的數(shù)字是且應(yīng)當(dāng)是如何規(guī)定的?看其規(guī)定的情境、確定的數(shù)字是否有利于公平正義的實(shí)現(xiàn)。 文章以“我國(guó)法律”作為“數(shù)字規(guī)定”的限定,決定了文章的分析以實(shí)然層面的實(shí)證分析為主,文章的目的也正在于說(shuō)明數(shù)字規(guī)定與法律之間存在著一定的關(guān)系,并且能夠在一定程度上揭示這種關(guān)系。應(yīng)當(dāng)指出的是,文章的第三部分也具有一定的應(yīng)然傾向,即不僅僅是對(duì)數(shù)字規(guī)定的理與據(jù)的概括,并且提出這些理與據(jù)也是進(jìn)行各種數(shù)字規(guī)定應(yīng)當(dāng)考慮的因素。(文章沒有具體分析,僅希望能夠提出一個(gè)有價(jià)值的論題)我想這就是本文存在的價(jià)值與意義。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the numerical stipulation in the law of our country as the research object, carries on the actual examination to the numerical stipulation in the law of our country by the method of the positive analysis. The article includes the introduction and four parts, the whole part takes the form of question as the title and serves as the logical thread of the article, and the answer to these questions is the content of the article. In the foreword part, the author explains the writing purpose of the article, that is, facing the large number stipulation in the law, it can not help but produce why stipulation and how to stipulate. The answer to these questions, and so on, is this article; The first part of the article, through the induction, the summary law in the numerical stipulation, from the characteristic, the content, the type and so on aspect carries on the combing to the legal figure, causes "in the law the number" to be a concrete, The independent image becomes an object which can be studied separately; In the second part, the first part solves the problem of "have" in the law, and the next question is "why is there?" that is, why should the figure be stipulated in the law. This part explains the necessity, necessity and necessity of the figures in the law from three aspects: the structure of the law, the content of the law and the realization of the law. The third part, followed by the first and second parts, answers the question of how the figures in the law are defined, that is, what is the rational basis of the figures in the law. By analyzing the digital clauses involved in the process of legislation and law revision in China, this part summarizes the factors considered in the establishment and reform of some digital clauses, the basis of which, It also points out that these bases should also be taken into account in the future. The fourth part of the conclusion, the law between the numerical provisions and fairness and justice between the "window paper", pointed out: in fact, we are all around fairness and justice: what is the number in the law? Can reflect the fair and just provisions of the law. Why does the law require figures? Because the number in the law is conducive to the realization of fairness and justice. How are and should the figures in the law be and should be? Look at its prescribed situation, determine whether the number is conducive to the realization of fairness and justice. The article regards "the law of our country" as the limit of "the number stipulation", which determines that the analysis of the article is based on the empirical analysis of the realistic level, and the purpose of the article is to explain that there is a certain relationship between the number regulation and the law. And can reveal this kind of relation to a certain extent. It should be pointed out that the third part of the article also has a certain tendency of ought to be, that is, not only generalize the rationale and evidence of the number stipulation, but also put forward that these principles and data are the factors that should be considered in the various numerical provisions. I think this is the value and significance of this paper.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前3條

1 蘇力;也許正在發(fā)生——中國(guó)當(dāng)代法學(xué)發(fā)展的一個(gè)概覽[J];比較法研究;2001年03期

2 杜金榜;從法律語(yǔ)言的模糊性到司法結(jié)果的確定性[J];現(xiàn)代外語(yǔ);2001年03期

3 占軍;;法律領(lǐng)域數(shù)字實(shí)證研究——以立法層面為例[J];中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)研究生學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期

，

本文編號(hào)：2386360