【摘要】：從2000年我國專利法修改以來，第一次對專利侵權(quán)的“損害賠償”作出較詳細(xì)的分類規(guī)定，結(jié)合2008年的第三次修改，我國賠償金額計(jì)算方法有四種：專利權(quán)人實(shí)際損失、侵權(quán)人獲利、專利許可費(fèi)倍數(shù)和法定賠償。專利法第三次修改以后，將專利權(quán)人實(shí)際損失的計(jì)算方式放在了首位，明確了各種計(jì)算方法的順序，但實(shí)踐操作中仍存在許多無法確定適用規(guī)則以及具體運(yùn)用計(jì)算方法上的無力，近幾年也有許多學(xué)者對該議題提出見解與建議，本人旨在通過對最新書籍和文獻(xiàn)數(shù)據(jù)的解讀分析，系統(tǒng)地梳理美國專利侵權(quán)賠償額的確定方法，，尤其是權(quán)利人所失利潤與合理許可費(fèi)的實(shí)際操作規(guī)則，通過一些典型案例的羅列，來找到美國法院確定損害賠償額的方式，從而找到建立我國相關(guān)規(guī)則的適用方法。 本文除引言與結(jié)語外共由四章組成。 第一章為問題的提出。本章開門見山，由幾個(gè)典型案例的判決內(nèi)容與結(jié)果引出我國現(xiàn)行專利侵權(quán)損害賠償制度存在的幾個(gè)問題，主要包括計(jì)算方式適用不夠完善、舉證問題不夠清晰以及對侵權(quán)人的懲罰力度不夠等，這一章的內(nèi)容為之后的美國相關(guān)賠償制度的展開作了鋪墊。 第二章為美國專利侵權(quán)損害賠償額的確定。本章詳細(xì)介紹了美國的專利救濟(jì)制度及其損害賠償?shù)挠?jì)算方法，包括了非法獲利計(jì)算方法的歷史與廢除原因，在一定程度上提供了一些確定賠償額的線索，重點(diǎn)在于美國法中的所示利潤賠償法與合理許可費(fèi)賠償法的介紹，并在其中引出對我國具有影響和借鑒力的要點(diǎn)。 第三章為我國專利侵權(quán)損害賠償額的確定。本章運(yùn)用實(shí)證研究的方法對我國的東部、西部、中部地區(qū)的典型省份進(jìn)行案例追蹤，了解每一個(gè)專利侵權(quán)案件的損害賠償計(jì)算方法以及賠償額，得出具有研究價(jià)值的數(shù)據(jù)及圖表，用以直觀地表現(xiàn)我國法院近5年的損害賠償判決情況，為上文所述我國司法實(shí)踐中關(guān)于使用賠償額計(jì)算方法問題的佐證。 第四章為我國對美國專利侵權(quán)損害賠償制度的借鑒。本章在前兩章的基礎(chǔ)上，將美國法中較有價(jià)值有實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)的法則引入我國的審判實(shí)踐中，豐富了法條的概述性，也能為法院在確定損害賠償額過程提供建設(shè)性的完善建議，以期提高我國對專利的保護(hù)水平。
[Abstract]:Since the revision of China's Patent Law in 2000, for the first time, the "damages" for patent infringement have been classified in more detail. Combined with the third revision in 2008, there are four methods for calculating the amount of compensation in China: the actual loss of the patentee. Infringer profit, patent license fee multiple and legal compensation. After the third revision of the Patent Law, the calculation method of the actual loss of the patentee has been put in the first place, and the order of various calculation methods has been clarified. However, in practice, there are still many difficulties in determining the applicable rules and the weakness in the concrete application of calculation methods. In recent years, many scholars have also put forward their opinions and suggestions on this subject. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the latest books and literature data. Systematically combing the methods of determining the amount of compensation for patent infringement in the United States, especially the actual operating rules of the lost profits and reasonable licence fees of the right holders, and by listing some typical cases, to find out the way for the US courts to determine the compensation for damages. In order to find out the applicable method of establishing the relevant rules of our country. This paper consists of four chapters except introduction and conclusion. The first chapter is the question. From the content and results of several typical cases, this chapter leads to several problems existing in the current patent infringement compensation system in China, including the inadequate application of calculation methods. The problem of proof is not clear enough and the punishment of infringer is not enough. The content of this chapter paves the way for the development of the related compensation system in the United States. The second chapter is the determination of the damages for patent infringement in the United States. This chapter introduces in detail the patent relief system in the United States and the calculation methods of damages, including the history and the reasons for abolishing the method of illegal profit calculation, and to a certain extent provides some clues to determine the amount of compensation. The emphasis is on the introduction of the profit compensation law and the reasonable license compensation law in American law, and the key points which have influence and reference power to our country. The third chapter is the determination of the damages for patent infringement in China. This chapter uses the method of empirical research to trace the typical provinces in the east, west and central of our country to find out how to calculate the damages and the amount of compensation in each patent infringement case. The data and charts with research value are obtained, which can be used to intuitively express the judgment of damages awarded by Chinese courts in the past five years, which is the proof of the use of compensation calculation method in the judicial practice of our country mentioned above. The fourth chapter is the reference of our country to the American patent infringement compensation system. On the basis of the first two chapters, this chapter introduces the more valuable and practical rules of American law into the trial practice of our country, which enriches the generality of the articles of law, and can also provide constructive suggestions for the court in the process of determining the compensation for damages. In order to improve the level of patent protection in China.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：D971.2;D923.42

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

中國期刊全文數(shù)據(jù)庫 前8條

1 王利明;美國懲罰性賠償制度研究[J];比較法研究;2003年05期

2 范曉宇;;專利侵權(quán)損害賠償?shù)囊捌渑e證責(zé)任——以《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》為切入點(diǎn)[J];法學(xué)雜志;2012年01期

3 張玲;紀(jì)璐;;美國專利侵權(quán)懲罰性賠償制度及其啟示[J];法學(xué)雜志;2013年02期

4 阮開欣;;解讀美國專利侵權(quán)損害賠償計(jì)算中的合理許可費(fèi)方法[J];中國發(fā)明與專利;2012年07期

5 張玲;;論專利侵權(quán)賠償損失的歸責(zé)原則[J];中國法學(xué);2012年02期

6 鄭成思;侵害知識產(chǎn)權(quán)的無過錯(cuò)責(zé)任[J];中國法學(xué);1998年01期

7 和育東;;專利侵權(quán)損害賠償計(jì)算制度:變遷、比較與借鑒[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2009年05期

8 李秀娟;;評美國Uniloc USA案中重要規(guī)則法適用的轉(zhuǎn)變[J];知識產(chǎn)權(quán);2011年05期

本文編號：2361938