【摘要】：新加坡鞭刑極富特色，同時(shí)其爭(zhēng)議也頗多。通過對(duì)新加坡鞭刑歷史沿革的介紹和爭(zhēng)議的梳理，可發(fā)現(xiàn)，新加坡鞭刑有其自身的發(fā)展脈絡(luò)，政府對(duì)于關(guān)于鞭刑引發(fā)的爭(zhēng)議有其自身的看法和回應(yīng)，對(duì)于新加坡鞭刑并不能一味的批判和否定，可以說其介于文明與野蠻之間，至少在新加坡這一制度是適合的。 盡管新加坡鞭刑存在諸多爭(zhēng)議，可它卻長(zhǎng)期存在，這一現(xiàn)象是多種因素共同造成的。第一，社會(huì)治安壓力大。由于多元的社會(huì)、匱乏的自然資源等情況，這迫使新加坡保留了鞭刑制度；第二，威權(quán)政治體制的存在。新加坡鞭刑是威權(quán)政治體制制度層面的具體體現(xiàn)，威權(quán)體制下，實(shí)用主義的執(zhí)政理念、強(qiáng)勢(shì)政府的制度保障，社會(huì)本位的價(jià)值取向似的政府選擇長(zhǎng)期實(shí)行鞭刑；第三，鞭刑自身特性。新加坡鞭刑所具有的執(zhí)行成本低、收效明顯、相對(duì)的刑罰輕微性、恥辱心理的持續(xù)性等特性，使得它在懲治犯罪中受到明顯的效果。 新加坡鞭刑制度的長(zhǎng)期存在給我們帶來(lái)了諸多的啟示。一是法治現(xiàn)代化中應(yīng)重視本土資源并理性對(duì)待外來(lái)資源，二是刑罰演變是方向性與多樣性的統(tǒng)一，三是認(rèn)識(shí)到法律與政治因素的復(fù)雜關(guān)系�？梢�，一方面鞭刑制度是新加坡本土文化、政治等資源與外來(lái)法制資源相結(jié)合的產(chǎn)物，這也是其在新加坡取得了巨大的成功根本原因，他國(guó)不宜盲目模仿；另一方面，鞭刑制度作為一種刑罰制度，，其發(fā)展并不能超出刑罰演變的現(xiàn)代化方向，只是其途徑和時(shí)間將取決于新加坡自身的經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、文化因素，就目前來(lái)看，鞭刑制度將依然會(huì)繼續(xù)存在。
[Abstract]:Singapore whipping is characteristic, at the same time its controversy is also quite many. By introducing the history of whipping in Singapore and combing the controversy, we can find that the whipping in Singapore has its own development, and the government has its own views and responses to the controversy caused by whipping. To Singapore whipping can not be blindly criticized and denied, it can be said to be between civilization and barbarism, at least in Singapore this system is appropriate. Although there are many controversies about whipping in Singapore, it exists for a long time, which is caused by many factors. First, public order is under great pressure. Due to the plural society and the scarcity of natural resources, Singapore has retained the whipping system; second, the existence of authoritarian political system. The flogging of Singapore is the embodiment of the system of authoritarian political system. Under the authoritarian system, the ruling idea of pragmatism, the system guarantee of strong government, and the value orientation of society standard, the government chooses to implement whipping for a long time. Third, the nature of whipping itself. Singapore's whipping has the characteristics of low execution cost, obvious effect, relatively slight penalty, persistent stigma and so on, which makes it get obvious effect in punishing crime. The long-term existence of the whipping system in Singapore has brought us a lot of enlightenment. First, the modernization of the rule of law should attach importance to local resources and treat foreign resources rationally, second, the evolution of punishment is the unity of direction and diversity, and the third is the recognition of the complex relationship between law and political factors. It can be seen that, on the one hand, the whipping system is the product of the combination of Singapore's native culture, politics and foreign legal resources, which is the fundamental reason for its great success in Singapore, and other countries should not blindly imitate. On the other hand, as a penalty system, the development of the whipping system is not beyond the modernized direction of the evolution of the penalty, but its way and time will depend on Singapore's own economic, political and cultural factors. At present, The system of whipping will continue to exist.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：煙臺(tái)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：D933.9;D909.9

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 蘇力;福柯的刑罰史研究及對(duì)法學(xué)的貢獻(xiàn)[J];比較法研究;1993年02期

2 王子昌;新加坡強(qiáng)政府與好政府[J];東南亞縱橫;2003年06期

3 黃松贊;簡(jiǎn)論“新加坡特色”[J];東南亞研究;1992年Z1期

4 謝青霞;;李光耀與新加坡的刑事政策[J];東南亞研究;2009年03期

5 鄒平學(xué);新加坡法治的制度、理念和特色[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年05期

6 左衛(wèi)民,周洪波;從合法到非法:刑訊逼供的語(yǔ)境分析[J];法學(xué);2002年10期

7 蔣凌申;;略論新加坡鞭刑制度的法律基礎(chǔ)[J];河北法學(xué);2012年02期

8 蘇力;關(guān)于對(duì)抗制的幾點(diǎn)法理學(xué)和法律社會(huì)學(xué)思考[J];法學(xué)研究;1995年04期

9 蘇力;判決書的背后[J];法學(xué)研究;2001年03期

10 儲(chǔ)槐植;刑罰現(xiàn)代化:刑法修改的價(jià)值定向[J];法學(xué)研究;1997年01期

本文編號(hào)：2353589