論美國(guó)《反海外腐敗法》對(duì)中國(guó)企業(yè)合規(guī)審查的啟示
[Abstract]:Lucent's bribery incident and Zhang Enzhao's resignation not only brought China's business "hidden rules" to the surface, but also brought the United States'"overseas Corruption Act" to our front. The United States overseas Corruption Act ("Foreign Corrupt Practices Act", or "FCPA") was enacted in 1977 and amended in 1988 and 1998, respectively, to prohibit American individuals and businesses from directly or indirectly referring to foreign officials. Foreign political parties or candidates make illegal payments. FCPA mainly consists of two parts, namely, anti-bribery clause, account book and record clause. The anti-bribery clause provides that any "issuer" and "domestic business" and its managers, directors, employees or agents, or shareholders acting on their behalf, shall be paid if they are provided by mail or by any instrument of interstate commerce or by corrupt means, Promising to pay or authorize the payment of any money or to provide gifts, giving or authorizing the provision of any property to "any foreign official" or "any foreign political party or any of its officials or any candidate of a foreign political party" for the purpose of obtaining, It is illegal to maintain business or to obtain any improper advantage. The books and records terms require that the integrity and accuracy of the books and records be maintained, that internal accounting controls be established and disclosed in order to clearly reflect the whereabouts and manner of the assets, thereby eliminating corrupt payments by the issuer. Compliance review is the compliance review system for identifying, evaluating, guarding against, reporting, tracking and testing compliance risks in compliance departments or compliance management positions. Chinese companies have not been exposed to the concept of "compliance" for a long time, and the establishment of a compliance review function is often passive, in a way that still tends to deal with legal matters after compliance matters occur, rather than focusing on pre-emptive prevention. In addition to the existing laws and regulations of our country, our country has signed the UN Convention against Corruption in December 2003, so it is very important when our country formulates the laws and regulations concerning overseas bribery. Secondly, with China's accession to the "World Trade Organization" and economic globalization, Chinese enterprises are participating more and more in international trade and trade activities and are beginning to expand their overseas markets with ambition. Setting up branches abroad and seeking listings in overseas markets will inevitably be governed by FCPA laws in the United States, the European Union, and other countries. However, the construction of compliance review system of Chinese enterprises started late, and the practice is not much. Therefore, it is necessary to study the relevant laws of FCPA and the best practices of international advanced enterprises in the United States and other countries. To establish an effective compliance review system, we must first obtain the support and participation of the top management of the enterprise, and invest sufficient human and financial resources in the compliance review. Second, there must be a pre-established compliance review process that includes both static documentation and a set of step-by-step working procedures and supporting other systems, Such as anonymous reporting system and violation of compliance policy punishment system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:華東政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2010
【分類號(hào)】:D922.294;D971.2
【共引文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 趙綱;;論股東對(duì)公司債權(quán)人的直接責(zé)任[J];商業(yè)研究;2006年02期
2 李軍;中國(guó)公司海外上市[J];北京市政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2000年04期
3 王碧紅;國(guó)有企業(yè)改制過(guò)程中審計(jì)監(jiān)督問(wèn)題的探討[J];財(cái)經(jīng)理論與實(shí)踐;2005年03期
4 張文靜;公司人格否認(rèn)的法理探討[J];中國(guó)司法;2001年02期
5 肖志剛;公司成立前所生債的承擔(dān)[J];法律適用;2002年08期
6 李國(guó)海;論股份制改革條件下國(guó)有企業(yè)的法律界定[J];法商研究-中南財(cái)經(jīng)政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(法學(xué)版);2001年05期
7 周小猛;淺議母子公司關(guān)系中的公司人格否認(rèn)制度[J];貴州警官職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期
8 張永來(lái);對(duì)中小股東權(quán)益保護(hù)的思考[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年06期
9 李冬青;美國(guó)、德國(guó)反壟斷法控制企業(yè)并購(gòu)的比較研究[J];廣西大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2005年05期
10 丁國(guó)軍,劉錕;對(duì)股份有限公司減少注冊(cè)資本若干問(wèn)題的法律分析[J];廣西政法管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年S2期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條
1 巴布;;淺談瑕疵股東股權(quán)轉(zhuǎn)讓效力認(rèn)定及其救濟(jì)途徑[A];中國(guó)民商法實(shí)務(wù)論壇論文集[C];2005年
相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前6條
1 王寶蒞;斷了線的等價(jià)交換?!——合同的倫理分析[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2003年
2 車敬子;中國(guó)外商投資企業(yè)法律制度及其完善[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2004年
3 田東霞;西部地區(qū)中小企業(yè)發(fā)展的法律保障研究[D];中央民族大學(xué);2005年
4 金劍鋒;關(guān)聯(lián)公司法律制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年
5 蘇三永;公司分立制度研究[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2005年
6 凌祁漫;公司設(shè)立法律制度研究[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2006年
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條
1 段曉紅;公司注冊(cè)資本法律問(wèn)題研究[D];廣西大學(xué);2001年
2 鄧佳文;“刺破公司面紗”法制度研究[D];廈門(mén)大學(xué);2001年
3 陳德麗;關(guān)聯(lián)交易的中外公司法規(guī)制研究[D];大連海事大學(xué);2002年
4 何芳;美國(guó)公司法中術(shù)語(yǔ)的概念分析和翻譯[D];廣東外語(yǔ)外貿(mào)大學(xué);2003年
5 楊立安;國(guó)有獨(dú)資公司治理結(jié)構(gòu)法律問(wèn)題研究[D];湘潭大學(xué);2003年
6 王明輝;MBO在國(guó)有企業(yè)中的適用性及相關(guān)法律問(wèn)題[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2004年
7 胡德佳;股票期權(quán)激勵(lì)制度的基本法律問(wèn)題研究[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2004年
8 宋中惠;基于信息不對(duì)稱的中小股東保護(hù)機(jī)制建立研究[D];華中師范大學(xué);2004年
9 畢佐薇;跨國(guó)并購(gòu)的法律制度[D];吉林大學(xué);2004年
10 劉華容;論企業(yè)決策的倫理[D];中南大學(xué);2003年
,本文編號(hào):2317611
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2317611.html