【摘要】：哈貝馬斯的交往行動理論作為社會哲學的元理論,為解釋國家法之外的社會調(diào)控體系之合法性提供了堅實的理論基礎。本文采取社會本位的法律多元主義的立場,以哈貝馬斯交往行動理論為出發(fā)點,分析了交往互動行為對日常生活中的法規(guī)范之形成的建構(gòu)性意義。通過討論"日常生活中的法"的產(chǎn)生、形成與發(fā)展過程,指出了"日常生活中的法"體系對社會生活的基礎性調(diào)控作用。并結(jié)合中國法治社會進程中所遇到的困難,討論了建構(gòu)良性循環(huán)的"日常生活法體系"對形成健康平衡的社會秩序調(diào)控系統(tǒng)的重要意義。本文第一部分對哈貝馬斯的交往行動理論進行了簡單的梳理,指出交往互動行為和生活世界是哈氏理論中最為核心的兩個概念。并結(jié)合案例,通過分析哈氏理論的貢獻與不足,對建構(gòu)交往理性基礎之上的"日常生活中的法"體系進行了理論鋪墊。第二部分討論了建立在交往理性之上的"日常生活中的法"之形成與發(fā)展過程。首先,通過考察日常生活中的法與"活法"的區(qū)別聯(lián)系,把"日常生活中的法"定義為:在交往行動中產(chǎn)生,經(jīng)由主體一致性同意而形成對彼此行為之穩(wěn)定性預期,從而約束主體行為,具有連續(xù)性規(guī)范意義的行為準則。隨后,根據(jù)社會心理學家塔爾德"社會模擬理論",分析了隨著交往及交往擴大化,"日常生活中的法"吸收整合其他一般行為規(guī)范而不斷發(fā)展的過程。第三部分討論了"日常生活中的法"的組成部分及其內(nèi)部效力層級的劃分。通過闡釋"日常生活中的法"與"生活中的微觀法律"、道德以及習慣法之間的關(guān)聯(lián)性,將"日常生活中的法"體系內(nèi)部的效力層級劃分及其運行、制裁機制呈現(xiàn)出來。同時指出,生活中的微觀法律、社會道德規(guī)范和習慣法因為形成與運作方式的差別,其效力等級呈逐步遞增狀態(tài)。最后,本文從中國法治社會進程中遇到的困境出發(fā),指出轉(zhuǎn)型中國社會,同樣遇到了哈貝馬斯的"生活世界殖民化"的問題。無論是國家法體系,還是"日常生活中的法"體系都面臨著巨大的困境,只有充分恢復交往理性,重視法與社會生活的良性互動,建立一個良性循環(huán)的"日常生活中的法"體系,才能建構(gòu)起具有整體性意義的、健康平衡的社會調(diào)控體系。
[Abstract]:Habermas' communicative action theory, as a meta-theory of social philosophy, provides a solid theoretical basis for explaining the legitimacy of social regulation system outside the state law. Based on Habermas' communicative action theory, this paper analyzes the constructive significance of communicative interaction to the formation of legal norms in daily life. Based on the discussion of the emergence, formation and development of "Law in Daily Life", this paper points out that the system of "Law in Daily Life" plays a fundamental role in regulating social life. In the light of the difficulties encountered in the process of the society governed by law in China, this paper discusses the importance of constructing a benign cycle of "daily life law system" for the formation of a healthy and balanced system of social order regulation and control. In the first part of this paper, Habermas's theory of communicative action is briefly combed, and it is pointed out that communicative interaction and the world of life are the two most important concepts in Habermas's theory. By analyzing the contribution and deficiency of Hartmann's theory, this paper lays a theoretical foundation for the construction of the "law in daily life" system based on communicative rationality. The second part discusses the formation and development of the law in daily life based on communicative rationality. First of all, by examining the difference between daily life law and "living law", we define "law in daily life" as the expectation of the stability of each other's behavior, which comes into being in the course of communication and is agreed by the subject. Thus constrains the subject behavior, has the continuity norm significance behavior rule. Then, according to the social psychologist Talde's "social simulation theory", this paper analyzes the process of the development of the "law of daily life", which integrates other general norms of behavior with the expansion of communication and communication. The third part discusses the components of the Law in Daily Life and the division of its internal effectiveness. By explaining the relationship between "law in daily life" and "micro-law in life", morality and customary law, the classification and operation of "law in daily life" system is divided and the sanction mechanism is presented. At the same time, it is pointed out that the micro law, social moral norm and customary law in life are gradually increasing in effect because of the difference between their formation and operation. Finally, starting from the difficulties encountered in the process of China's society under the rule of law, this paper points out that the transformation of Chinese society has also encountered the problem of Habermas's "colonization of the living world". Both the system of national law and the system of "law in daily life" are faced with great difficulties. Only by fully restoring the reason of communication and attaching importance to the benign interaction between law and social life, Only by establishing a virtuous cycle of "law in daily life" system can we construct a healthy and balanced social control system.
【作者單位】： 吉林省通化市東昌區(qū)工商聯(lián);
【分類號】：D909

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前8條

1 童世駿;沒有“主體間性”就沒有“規(guī)則”——論哈貝馬斯的規(guī)則觀[J];復旦學報(社會科學版);2002年05期

2 劉金國;聞立軍;;法治秩序斷想[J];法學雜志;2008年02期

3 王斐;;“活法”與“行動中的法”——兼論民間法研究的兩條路徑[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2007年03期

4 艾圍利;;論民事習慣的法律地位及其立法思考[J];南京師大學報(社會科學版);2008年03期

5 傅永軍;哈貝馬斯交往行為合理化理論述評[J];山東大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2003年03期

6 胡旭晟;20世紀前期中國之民商事習慣調(diào)查及其意義[J];湘潭大學學報(哲學社會科學版);1999年02期

7 喻中;;論習慣法的誕生[J];政法論叢;2008年05期

8 D.威爾特恩;靳希平;鄭辟瑞;;另類胡塞爾——胡塞爾現(xiàn)象學的“標準化”和“非標準化”的解讀(續(xù))[J];世界哲學;2008年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 徐顯明;[N];文匯報;2006年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前1條

1 湯唯;法社會學在中國[D];華東政法學院;2005年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前1條

1 張向陽;哈貝馬斯的生活世界理論評述[D];蘇州大學;2004年

【共引文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 孫日華;謝慧;;法律客觀性的出路——中西對比的視角[J];安徽大學法律評論;2010年02期

2 張纓;中國轉(zhuǎn)型期企業(yè)間經(jīng)濟活動“低信任”違約現(xiàn)象的社會學解釋[J];安徽大學學報;2001年03期

3 王炳;;反壟斷執(zhí)法和解的制度機理[J];安徽大學學報(哲學社會科學版);2010年02期

4 陳正華,賀軼玲;論道德交往與學校道德教育[J];安徽教育學院學報;2002年02期

5 呂明;;現(xiàn)代律師制度功能新探[J];安徽教育學院學報;2006年01期

6 呂明;;論法律意識形態(tài)在建設社會主義和諧社會中的作用[J];合肥師范學院學報;2009年04期

7 朱壽興;;網(wǎng)絡文學的公共空間建構(gòu)與文學網(wǎng)站的使命[J];合肥師范學院學報;2009年04期

8 蔡曉榮;王國平;;晚清中國商業(yè)行會對洋商的“停交”抵制活動——基于經(jīng)濟和法律的視角[J];安徽史學;2006年05期

9 姚e，

本文編號：2298001