中韓著作權(quán)法律制度比較研究
[Abstract]:Copyright is an important part of a country's soft power. As the basic law to protect the author's rights and the lawful use of his works, copyright Law has a great influence on maintaining good order in the field of intellectual property and promoting the development and prosperity of social culture, which is called the basic Law of Human Culture. With the deepening of international exchanges and trade exchanges, China and South Korea have increasingly close ties in the field of copyright economy. However, differences in copyright legal systems between countries have led to friction or disputes in cultural communication and exchange. Affected the healthy operation of cultural exchanges between the two countries. In recent years, China and South Korea are negotiating and cooperating on intellectual property rights such as copyright and other intellectual property rights, hoping to reach a common understanding of intellectual property economic exchanges in the process of mutual learning and integration, so as to achieve win-win results. Under this background, this article chooses the copyright law system between China and South Korea, on the basis of expounding the historical development of the copyright legal system and the basic legal concept of copyright in the two countries, from the concept standard, the copyright restriction use system, The author compares the five perspectives of the rights of neighboring works, the protection of foreign works, the infringement of copyright, the criminal law and the remedy of administrative law, and analyzes the common points and differences between the two countries in order to fully understand the relevant laws of both countries. Strive to seek the copyright system in legislation and protection of the common ground to make a modest contribution.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中國(guó)海洋大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:D923.41;D931.26
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 王宛;韓國(guó)著作權(quán)事務(wù)現(xiàn)狀[J];當(dāng)代韓國(guó);1996年04期
2 巫文勇;;網(wǎng)絡(luò)作品與傳統(tǒng)著作權(quán)法的悖論——論知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)方法的創(chuàng)新[J];甘肅政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2007年03期
3 史征;;電視節(jié)目形態(tài)知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)與電視產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)展[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)論壇;2008年04期
4 魏曉笛,張寶香,韓冬云;網(wǎng)絡(luò)經(jīng)濟(jì)的影響及對(duì)策[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)師;2004年09期
5 倪大偉;;論著作權(quán)刑法保護(hù)的立法完善[J];科教文匯(上旬刊);2008年09期
6 馬文華;試論我國(guó)著作權(quán)的法律特征[J];南昌水專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào);1999年S1期
7 杜希林;;我國(guó)古代、近代的著作權(quán)保護(hù)探析[J];圖書(shū)館工作與研究;2008年03期
8 樊麗娜;;國(guó)內(nèi)外之比較:網(wǎng)絡(luò)鏈接的著作權(quán)保護(hù)[J];現(xiàn)代情報(bào);2008年01期
9 馬睿;;論著作權(quán)的法律特征[J];政法學(xué)刊;2008年03期
10 張平;中美數(shù)據(jù)庫(kù)著作權(quán)保護(hù)的司法比較[J];知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán);1998年05期
,本文編號(hào):2284662
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2284662.html