論美國(guó)刑事訴訟的憲法性質(zhì)及其借鑒
發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-19 18:45
【摘要】：刑事訴訟法是規(guī)定國(guó)家如何行使刑罰權(quán)的法律部門,在追訴犯罪的過(guò)程中,國(guó)家權(quán)力可能會(huì)直接延伸到個(gè)人的自由權(quán)利空間,此時(shí),國(guó)家權(quán)力與個(gè)人權(quán)利就不可避免地發(fā)生直接碰撞。因此在所有的訴訟程序中,刑事訴訟中權(quán)力權(quán)利之間的對(duì)抗最為激烈,刑事程序運(yùn)行的結(jié)果更是關(guān)系到自由甚至生命;同時(shí)刑事程序又非常特殊,一方面它作為保障社會(huì)秩序的終極手段,另一方面它又是個(gè)人捍衛(wèi)自身完整、獨(dú)立于社會(huì)存在的最后機(jī)會(huì)。而憲法的中心任務(wù)就是保護(hù)權(quán)利和限制權(quán)力,由于在保護(hù)人權(quán)方面,刑事訴訟法與憲法有著相同的立法目的,因此二者有著天然的聯(lián)系。美國(guó)刑事司法制度的最大特點(diǎn),就是將一些直接涉及公民人權(quán)和自由的訴訟行為上升到憲法高度,為公民在刑事訴訟中的權(quán)利提供憲法性保障。美國(guó)擁有十分龐大而復(fù)雜的、與來(lái)源于憲法性解釋的刑事司法相關(guān)的法律匯編。因此,有必要對(duì)于美國(guó)刑事訴訟的憲法性質(zhì)加以全面而詳細(xì)的論述,這對(duì)于我國(guó)一些基本的刑事訴訟基本原則入憲也有一定的借鑒意義。 美國(guó)刑事訴訟憲法性質(zhì)的形成有其獨(dú)特的歷史背景和發(fā)展條件,殖民地時(shí)期美國(guó)人民深受英國(guó)自然法的影響,相信“天賦人權(quán)”,獨(dú)立革命后,美國(guó)的先驅(qū)者按照孟德斯鳩社會(huì)契約論的觀點(diǎn)建立新政府,實(shí)行分權(quán)的政治體制統(tǒng)治,英國(guó)的法律至上觀念在美國(guó)表現(xiàn)為憲法至上,憲法在美國(guó)是“高級(jí)法”。聯(lián)邦憲法在其文本中重點(diǎn)和詳盡地規(guī)定刑事訴訟制度,使得其刑事訴訟法具有了至高無(wú)上的法律淵源。分權(quán)的政治體制、判例法的傳統(tǒng)以及完善的憲法救濟(jì)制度都為美國(guó)刑事訴訟憲法性質(zhì)的發(fā)展鞏固起到了一定的作用。美國(guó)刑事訴訟憲法性質(zhì)主要表現(xiàn)在兩個(gè)方面,一是在憲法文本中諸多刑事訴訟基本權(quán)利的規(guī)定,比如《權(quán)利法案》中有多達(dá)十二項(xiàng)關(guān)于刑事訴訟基本權(quán)利的規(guī)定;二是刑事正當(dāng)程序的規(guī)定,聯(lián)邦憲法第五修正案和第十四修正案都規(guī)定了正當(dāng)程序,兩個(gè)條款有其內(nèi)在的區(qū)別與聯(lián)系。其他有關(guān)刑事訴訟的規(guī)定也被包含在聯(lián)邦憲法之中,比如法院體系,管轄制度等,此外,日益受重視的被害人權(quán)利入憲也只是個(gè)時(shí)間問(wèn)題,同時(shí),美國(guó)刑事訴訟法在憲法領(lǐng)域內(nèi)也面臨著很多新的問(wèn)題,如有關(guān)規(guī)則面臨的新挑戰(zhàn),高科技手段的影響,民族種族問(wèn)題等。 隨著各國(guó)紛紛加入《世界人權(quán)宣言》、《公民權(quán)利和政治權(quán)利國(guó)際公約》等國(guó)際性公約,刑事訴訟憲法化已經(jīng)成為一種國(guó)際趨勢(shì)。相比之下,我國(guó)有不小的差距,很多屬于基本人權(quán)范疇的刑事訴訟權(quán)利以及正當(dāng)程序的規(guī)定在憲法中并未得到體現(xiàn),刑事訴訟權(quán)利和刑事正當(dāng)程序缺少憲法淵源,很容易遭到侵犯,我國(guó)國(guó)情不同于美國(guó),比如在政治體制、法律傳統(tǒng)和憲法救濟(jì)方面就有很大的不同,因此,參照美國(guó)經(jīng)驗(yàn)的同時(shí),應(yīng)該根據(jù)我國(guó)國(guó)情,探尋適合我國(guó)的刑事訴訟憲法化道路。
[Abstract]:The Code of Criminal procedure is a legal department that specifies how the state exercises the right to penalty. In the process of prosecuting a crime, the power of the state may extend directly to the space of the individual's free right. At this time, State power and individual rights inevitably collide directly. Therefore, in all the proceedings, the confrontation between the rights of power in the criminal proceedings is the most fierce, the result of the operation of the criminal procedure is even more related to freedom and even life; at the same time, the criminal procedure is very special. On the one hand, it is the ultimate means to safeguard social order, on the other hand, it is the last opportunity for individuals to defend their own integrity and independence from social existence. The central task of the constitution is to protect and restrict the power. Because the criminal procedure law and the constitution have the same legislative purpose in the protection of human rights, the two have a natural connection. The greatest characteristic of the American criminal justice system is to raise some litigation acts directly related to the human rights and freedoms of citizens to the height of the Constitution and to provide constitutional protection for the rights of citizens in criminal proceedings. The United States has a very large and complex collection of criminal justice related to constitutional interpretation. Therefore, it is necessary to make a comprehensive and detailed discussion on the constitutional nature of American criminal procedure, which has some reference significance for some basic principles of criminal procedure in our country. The formation of the constitutional nature of American criminal procedure has its unique historical background and development conditions. During the colonial period, the American people were deeply influenced by British natural law and believed that "natural human rights", after the independent revolution, According to Montesquieu's view of social contract, American pioneers established a new government and exercised a decentralized political system. In the United States, the supremacy of the British law was manifested as the supremacy of the constitution, which was the "higher law" in the United States. The federal constitution lays down the criminal procedure system in detail in its text, which makes the criminal procedure law have supreme legal origin. The political system of separation of powers, the tradition of case law and the perfect system of constitutional remedy have played a certain role in the development and consolidation of the constitutional nature of American criminal procedure. The constitutional nature of American criminal procedure is mainly manifested in two aspects. One is that there are as many provisions on the basic rights of criminal procedure in the text of the Constitution, for example, there are as many as 12 provisions on the basic rights of criminal procedure in the Bill of Rights; Second, the provisions of criminal due process, the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution provide for due process, the two provisions have their inherent differences and links. Other provisions on criminal proceedings are also included in the federal constitution, such as the court system, the jurisdiction system, and so on. In addition, it is only a matter of time before the increasingly valued rights of victims are included in the Constitution. The United States Criminal procedure Law also faces many new problems in the constitutional field, such as the new challenges to the relevant rules, the influence of high-tech means, the issue of ethnic groups, and so on. With the accession of countries to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights, constitutionalization of criminal proceedings has become an international trend. In contrast, there is not a small gap in our country. Many of the criminal procedural rights and due process provisions belonging to the basic human rights category have not been reflected in the Constitution, and the criminal procedural rights and due process lack the constitutional origin. Our national conditions are very different from those of the United States. For example, there are very different political systems, legal traditions and constitutional remedies. Therefore, when referring to the experience of the United States, we should, at the same time, take the situation of our country into account. To explore the constitutional road of criminal procedure suitable for our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD915.3;DD911
本文編號(hào)：2250996
[Abstract]:The Code of Criminal procedure is a legal department that specifies how the state exercises the right to penalty. In the process of prosecuting a crime, the power of the state may extend directly to the space of the individual's free right. At this time, State power and individual rights inevitably collide directly. Therefore, in all the proceedings, the confrontation between the rights of power in the criminal proceedings is the most fierce, the result of the operation of the criminal procedure is even more related to freedom and even life; at the same time, the criminal procedure is very special. On the one hand, it is the ultimate means to safeguard social order, on the other hand, it is the last opportunity for individuals to defend their own integrity and independence from social existence. The central task of the constitution is to protect and restrict the power. Because the criminal procedure law and the constitution have the same legislative purpose in the protection of human rights, the two have a natural connection. The greatest characteristic of the American criminal justice system is to raise some litigation acts directly related to the human rights and freedoms of citizens to the height of the Constitution and to provide constitutional protection for the rights of citizens in criminal proceedings. The United States has a very large and complex collection of criminal justice related to constitutional interpretation. Therefore, it is necessary to make a comprehensive and detailed discussion on the constitutional nature of American criminal procedure, which has some reference significance for some basic principles of criminal procedure in our country. The formation of the constitutional nature of American criminal procedure has its unique historical background and development conditions. During the colonial period, the American people were deeply influenced by British natural law and believed that "natural human rights", after the independent revolution, According to Montesquieu's view of social contract, American pioneers established a new government and exercised a decentralized political system. In the United States, the supremacy of the British law was manifested as the supremacy of the constitution, which was the "higher law" in the United States. The federal constitution lays down the criminal procedure system in detail in its text, which makes the criminal procedure law have supreme legal origin. The political system of separation of powers, the tradition of case law and the perfect system of constitutional remedy have played a certain role in the development and consolidation of the constitutional nature of American criminal procedure. The constitutional nature of American criminal procedure is mainly manifested in two aspects. One is that there are as many provisions on the basic rights of criminal procedure in the text of the Constitution, for example, there are as many as 12 provisions on the basic rights of criminal procedure in the Bill of Rights; Second, the provisions of criminal due process, the Fifth Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment of the Federal Constitution provide for due process, the two provisions have their inherent differences and links. Other provisions on criminal proceedings are also included in the federal constitution, such as the court system, the jurisdiction system, and so on. In addition, it is only a matter of time before the increasingly valued rights of victims are included in the Constitution. The United States Criminal procedure Law also faces many new problems in the constitutional field, such as the new challenges to the relevant rules, the influence of high-tech means, the issue of ethnic groups, and so on. With the accession of countries to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Covenant on Civil and political Rights, constitutionalization of criminal proceedings has become an international trend. In contrast, there is not a small gap in our country. Many of the criminal procedural rights and due process provisions belonging to the basic human rights category have not been reflected in the Constitution, and the criminal procedural rights and due process lack the constitutional origin. Our national conditions are very different from those of the United States. For example, there are very different political systems, legal traditions and constitutional remedies. Therefore, when referring to the experience of the United States, we should, at the same time, take the situation of our country into account. To explore the constitutional road of criminal procedure suitable for our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類號(hào)】：D971.2;DD915.3;DD911
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 魏曉娜;法理與論爭(zhēng):美國(guó)刑事正當(dāng)程序的范圍——兼論美國(guó)的正當(dāng)程序方法論[J];比較法研究;2005年01期
2 張澤濤;;禁止重復(fù)追訴研究——以大陸法系既判力理論為切入點(diǎn)[J];法律科學(xué)(西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào));2007年04期
3 彭建軍,郭松;美國(guó)刑事程序的憲法淵源及成因分析[J];湖北社會(huì)科學(xué);2003年11期
4 張千帆;;憲法人權(quán)保障還需要保障什么?——論刑事正當(dāng)程序入憲的必要性[J];法學(xué)家;2004年04期
5 龍宗智;;論刑事對(duì)質(zhì)制度及其改革完善[J];法學(xué);2008年05期
6 徐靜村;走向程序法治:中國(guó)刑事程序改革的憲政思考[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2003年04期
7 陳永生;刑事訴訟的程序性制裁[J];現(xiàn)代法學(xué);2004年01期
8 陳瑞華;刑事被告人權(quán)利的憲法化問(wèn)題[J];政法論壇;2004年03期
9 謝杰;潘琳琳;;倫奎斯特:在合理的限制中發(fā)展米蘭達(dá)規(guī)則[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2006年03期
10 陳虎;;美國(guó)被害人權(quán)利憲法化運(yùn)動(dòng)及啟示[J];中國(guó)刑事法雜志;2007年03期
，本文編號(hào)：2250996
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2250996.html
最近更新
教材專著
