發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-09-11 06:59

【摘要】：在中國(guó)歷史上,“親親隱隱”作為一項(xiàng)法律義務(wù),是指具有一定親情關(guān)系的人之間若有罪應(yīng)當(dāng)互相隱瞞、隱匿、拒絕作證、幫助逃跑等,不必負(fù)舉證責(zé)任且不予以處罰或者減輕處罰,而若對(duì)法律規(guī)定應(yīng)當(dāng)互相隱匿的親屬實(shí)施告發(fā)和作證則要被論罪的原則和制度。它作為一項(xiàng)法律原則和法律制度在中國(guó)的傳統(tǒng)法律體系中存續(xù)了二千多年,在中國(guó)古代倫理法中占有極為重要的地位�！坝H親隱隱”思想起源于以孔子為代表的儒家經(jīng)典著述,是對(duì)周禮“親親尊尊”傳統(tǒng)的延續(xù)。這一法律思想在西漢時(shí)期被統(tǒng)治者引禮入法,親親相隱原則得以確立,并率先在司法審判實(shí)踐中應(yīng)用,到隋唐時(shí)期得以成熟完善,而淡化于明末清初,轉(zhuǎn)型于清末和民國(guó)時(shí)期,最終夭折于新中國(guó)建立。 本文從三個(gè)部分探討了“親親相隱”在古今中外不同國(guó)家所具有的普遍性和強(qiáng)大生命力,通過(guò)比較研究闡明了“親親相隱”所具有的現(xiàn)代法律價(jià)值,并提出了自己的觀點(diǎn)和建議。 第一部分是通過(guò)對(duì)“親親相隱”這一原則和制度所產(chǎn)生的歷史背景、發(fā)展進(jìn)程和相關(guān)規(guī)定進(jìn)行梳理和歸納,重新對(duì)“親親相隱”這一我國(guó)歷史上的重要原則和制度所蘊(yùn)含的合理價(jià)值進(jìn)行解讀。 第二部分是對(duì)國(guó)外不同時(shí)期、不同法系國(guó)家關(guān)于“親親相隱”法律制度的規(guī)定進(jìn)行了梳理和歸納,并通過(guò)中外“親親相隱”法律制度相關(guān)規(guī)定的比較,得出共同點(diǎn)和不同點(diǎn),指出各個(gè)時(shí)期、各個(gè)國(guó)家都對(duì)容隱權(quán)作了相關(guān)規(guī)定,體現(xiàn)出了這一法律原則和制度所具有的普遍性和長(zhǎng)久性。 第三部分是分析了我國(guó)現(xiàn)代立法關(guān)于“親親相隱”制度規(guī)定的現(xiàn)狀,指出了立法對(duì)這一法律制度否定的原因及負(fù)面性,并在此基礎(chǔ)上闡述了“親親相隱”法律制度所具有的現(xiàn)代法律價(jià)值。最后,筆者結(jié)合我國(guó)現(xiàn)行相關(guān)法律規(guī)定,就如何在現(xiàn)代立法中重新確立“親親相隱”法律原則和制度,有針對(duì)性地提出了自己的合理建議。
[Abstract]:In the history of China, as a legal obligation, "closeness of kinship" means that people with certain kinship should conceal, refuse to testify, help escape and so on if they are guilty. There is no need to bear the burden of proof and not to punish or mitigate the punishment, but if the law stipulates that relatives who should be hidden from each other to report and testify, they will be subject to the principle and system of crime. As a legal principle and legal system, it has existed in China's traditional legal system for more than two thousand years, and occupies an extremely important position in ancient Chinese ethical law. The thought of "kiss vagueness" originates from the classical works of Confucianism represented by Confucius, and is a continuation of the tradition of "respecting one's relatives and respecting one's parents" in Zhou Li. This legal thought was introduced into the law by the rulers in the Western Han Dynasty, and the principle of the mutual concealment between relatives and relatives was established, and it was first applied in the judicial practice. By the Sui and Tang dynasties, it was matured and perfected, but it was desalinated in the late Ming Dynasty, the early Qing Dynasty, the transition period in the late Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China period. Finally died in the founding of New China. This paper discusses the universality and strong vitality of "closeness between relatives and relatives" in different countries in ancient and modern times, and expounds the modern legal value of "closeness between relatives and relatives" through comparative study. And put forward their own views and suggestions. The first part is to sort out and summarize the historical background, the development process and the relevant provisions of the principle and system of "closeness between relatives and relatives". This paper reinterprets the reasonable value of the important principle and system in the history of our country. The second part is to sort out and summarize the legal system of "close relatives hidden" in different countries of foreign countries in different periods, and draw the common points and differences through the comparison of the relevant provisions of Chinese and foreign legal system of "close relatives and close relatives' concealment". It is pointed out that various countries have made relevant provisions on the right of tolerance in each period, which reflects the universality and permanence of this legal principle and system. The third part is to analyze the current situation of the system of "close relatives hiding" in the modern legislation of our country, and point out the reason and the negativity of the legislation to this legal system. On the basis of this, the author expounds the modern legal value of the legal system. Finally, the author puts forward his own reasonable suggestions on how to re-establish the legal principle and system of "closeness of kinship and kinship" in modern legislation in combination with the current relevant laws and regulations of our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號(hào)】：D929

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 范忠信;親親相為隱:中外法律的共同傳統(tǒng)——兼論其根源及其與法治的關(guān)系[J];比較法研究;1997年02期

2 李志涌;;淺議親親相隱制度的重新構(gòu)建[J];滄桑;2009年02期

3 吳宇虹;;古巴比倫法典與秦漢法典比較:私有奴隸制和國(guó)家公有奴隸制[J];東北師大學(xué)報(bào);2006年06期

4 房保國(guó);證人作證豁免權(quán)探析[J];法律科學(xué).西北政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年04期

5 張本順;;“親親相隱”制度的刑事立法研究[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年06期

6 江學(xué);親親相隱及其現(xiàn)代化[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2002年05期

7 錢葉六;;論“親親相隱”制度在中國(guó)刑事法律中之重構(gòu)[J];法學(xué)評(píng)論;2006年05期

8 李偉;;中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)“親親相隱”制度重構(gòu)的必要性分析及立法建議[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年09期

9 張曉明;;論罪犯人權(quán)的憲法保障[J];廣州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2008年11期

10 肖敏;;親親相隱制度的解讀與重構(gòu)——以和諧社會(huì)為背景的思考[J];河南大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2007年05期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 楊輝;中國(guó)“親親相隱”制度研究[D];華東政法學(xué)院;2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2235950