【摘要】： 禮法融合是以儒家的政治法律思想作為封建立法、司法的指導(dǎo)原則,以儒家倫理道德規(guī)范作為封建立法的核心內(nèi)容。禮法融合是中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化的主要特征,一直是中國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)界關(guān)注和研究的重點(diǎn)研究課題之一。中國(guó)學(xué)術(shù)界特別是法學(xué)界對(duì)我國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化的研究已取得頗豐的成果,一批有創(chuàng)見(jiàn)的論著相繼問(wèn)世。但這些成果或論著通常是關(guān)于中華五千年整體法制文明的,而專(zhuān)門(mén)針對(duì)某一王朝的法律文化,研究則相對(duì)較少,尤其是西漢,由于漢律散佚,查詢(xún)難度頗大,故研究得太少。再者,禮法融合是春秋時(shí)期禮崩樂(lè)壞之后,戰(zhàn)國(guó)時(shí)代百家爭(zhēng)鳴的產(chǎn)物,在這期間值得關(guān)注和研究的文化比比皆是。從以往的研究和史料我們可以得知,自罷黜百家、獨(dú)尊儒術(shù)路線(xiàn)的開(kāi)始實(shí)施,禮法融合已成為一種自覺(jué)的運(yùn)動(dòng),特別是在董仲舒、公孫弘等人倡導(dǎo)的“春秋決獄”更是確立了儒家經(jīng)典的最高法律地位,并促進(jìn)了以經(jīng)注律,引禮入律,使儒家學(xué)說(shuō)這樣一個(gè)以往法學(xué)研究的工具轉(zhuǎn)變成為法律規(guī)范或者說(shuō)法律規(guī)范的精神,這無(wú)疑是對(duì)中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)法律文化和傳統(tǒng)法律價(jià)值觀的一種突破�；诖�,本文的主要研究目標(biāo)是從西漢政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化等方面出發(fā),來(lái)探索綿延數(shù)千年、時(shí)至今日仍余韻不歇的中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)禮文化為什么發(fā)展到西漢會(huì)和法相互融,從而在深的層次對(duì)西漢為什么是中國(guó)歷史上禮法融合的奠基期做一個(gè)合理的解釋,以期拋磚引玉。 可以說(shuō),西漢法律是歷史留給我們的一份珍貴遺產(chǎn),仔細(xì)研究西漢時(shí)期的社會(huì)基礎(chǔ),并從社會(huì)基礎(chǔ)中的經(jīng)濟(jì)、政治、官方哲學(xué)和倫理道德等角度闡述禮法融合得以產(chǎn)生的原因,不僅可以提高對(duì)西漢法律的研究高度,還對(duì)推動(dòng)當(dāng)前中國(guó)法治建設(shè)進(jìn)程有著重要的指導(dǎo)和借鑒意義。禮法融合的奠基期發(fā)生在西漢有其歷史的必然性。對(duì)此,我們應(yīng)該怎么去批判、繼承或是去其糟粕、取其精華?凡此種種都是我們當(dāng)代以人為本、構(gòu)建和諧社會(huì)過(guò)程中不可避免和必須回答的問(wèn)題,為此,我們不得不再次走進(jìn)歷史的深處,對(duì)西漢禮法融合的現(xiàn)實(shí)基礎(chǔ)做一翻重新的顧盼和審視。
[Abstract]:The integration of etiquette and law takes the political and legal thought of Confucianism as the guiding principle of feudal legislation and judicature, and the Confucian ethical norms as the core content of feudal legislation. The integration of etiquette and law is the main feature of Chinese traditional legal culture, and has always been one of the key research topics in Chinese academic circles. Great achievements have been made in the study of Chinese traditional legal culture, especially in the field of law, and a number of original works have been published one after another. However, these achievements or treatises are usually about the whole legal civilization of five thousand years of China, but the research on the legal culture of a certain dynasty is relatively few, especially in the Western Han Dynasty, because of the lost laws of the Han Dynasty and the difficulty of inquiry, the research is too few. Moreover, the integration of etiquette and law is the product of the warring States period, after the break of etiquette and music in the Spring and Autumn period. During this period, there are many cultures worthy of attention and study. From past research and historical data, we can see that the initiation of the line of ousting 100 schools and respecting Confucianism alone, the integration of etiquette and law has become a conscious movement, especially in Dong Zhongshu. Gongsun Hong and others advocated the "the Spring and Autumn period" to establish the highest legal status of the Confucian classics, and promoted the introduction of the law of the classics, the introduction of ritual into the law. It is undoubtedly a breakthrough to the Chinese traditional legal culture and traditional legal values to change the Confucian doctrine into a legal norm or the spirit of legal norms as a tool of legal research in the past. Based on this, the main research goal of this paper is to explore why the traditional Chinese ritual culture, which has lasted for thousands of years, has developed into the integration of the Western Han Dynasty and France from the political, economic and cultural aspects of the Western Han Dynasty. In order to make a reasonable explanation of why the Western Han Dynasty was the foundation of the integration of etiquette and law in the history of China. It can be said that the law of the Western Han Dynasty is a precious heritage left to us by history. We should carefully study the social foundation of the Western Han Dynasty and explain the reasons for the integration of etiquette and law from the angles of economy, politics, official philosophy and ethics in the social basis. It can not only improve the research height of the Western Han Dynasty law, but also have important guidance and reference significance to promote the construction of China's rule of law. The founding period of the integration of etiquette and law took place in the Western Han Dynasty with its historical inevitability. To this, how should we criticize, inherit or lose its dregs and take its essence? All these are the questions that we must answer in the process of building a harmonious society, so we have to go into the depth of history again. To the western Han Dynasty ritual law fusion realistic foundation makes a new look and examines.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：貴州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2009
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：D929

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 李曉東;試析韓非的“法治”思想[J];濱州師專(zhuān)學(xué)報(bào);1998年03期

2 艾永明;法家的重刑思想值得借鑒[J];法學(xué);1996年11期

3 劉寶才;春秋思想的過(guò)渡性質(zhì)與老子孔子學(xué)說(shuō)的誕生[J];管子學(xué)刊;2001年01期

4 何勤華;法家法治理論評(píng)析[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1999年01期

5 劉廣安;;法家法治思想的再評(píng)說(shuō)[J];華東政法學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2006年02期

6 晉文;論經(jīng)學(xué)與漢代忠孝觀的整合[J];江海學(xué)刊;2001年05期

7 龐凌,繆嵐;法家重刑思想淺析[J];江南社會(huì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2001年02期

8 馬新;論孝在中國(guó)傳統(tǒng)社會(huì)中的異化[J];孔子研究;2004年04期

9 崔永東;《王杖十簡(jiǎn)》與《王杖詔書(shū)令冊(cè)》法律思想研究——兼及“不道”罪考辨[J];法學(xué)研究;1999年02期

10 楊師群;論法家的“法治”及其法律思想[J];史林;1997年04期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 劉厚琴;漢代倫理與制度關(guān)系研究[D];山東大學(xué);2006年

，

本文編號(hào)：2220707