【摘要】：吳高亮發(fā)現(xiàn)烏木后,認(rèn)為應(yīng)當(dāng)取得所有權(quán)。于是,媒體先是叫屈,繼而放大政府與民爭利是一種"選擇性執(zhí)法"的觀點。烏木屬于埋藏物,而非吳高亮理解的"野生動植物資源"或者專家認(rèn)為的天然孳息。烏木被發(fā)現(xiàn)于承包的集體土地之內(nèi),意味著烏木埋藏的"埋藏物空間固定"、"埋藏物環(huán)境"等環(huán)境性因素的存在,作為至關(guān)重要的一個前置性因素,與古生物化石、礦產(chǎn)資源、文物的核心區(qū)別是代表的利益差別�！睹穹ㄍ▌t》第79條規(guī)定的"無主埋藏物歸國家所有",在《物權(quán)法》第114條處理中倒退為按照遺失物處理,媒體不適當(dāng)?shù)貫橹鳈?quán)先占理論張目,擴大廢棄物撿拾侵權(quán)、采蘑菇、挖奇石的資源合理利用的非正當(dāng)推演邏輯,是缺乏媒體社會責(zé)任的表現(xiàn)。
[Abstract]:After Wu Gaoliang discovered ebony, he thought he should take ownership. Therefore, the media first called qu, then magnified the government and the people for profit is a "selective law enforcement" view. Ebony belongs to buried objects, not to what Wu Goliang understands as "wildlife resources" or what experts believe are natural fruits. The fact that ebony is found in the contracted collective land means the existence of environmental factors such as "fixed space of buried objects", "environment of buried objects", etc., as a vital preemptive factor, with fossil paleontology, mineral resources, etc. The core difference of cultural relics is the difference of interests represented. Article 79 of the General principles of Civil Law stipulates that "unowned buried objects shall be owned by the State", and in the treatment of Article 114 of the property Law, they will be retrogressively treated in accordance with the lost property. The improper deductive logic of improper use of resources such as improper preemption of sovereignty, expansion of waste pick-up infringement, mushroom picking, and rational utilization of resources is the lack of social responsibility of the media.
【作者單位】： 四川大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號】：D920.5;D923.2

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 陳永正;從《大學(xué)衍義補》看丘浚的法律思想[J];泉州師范學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年05期

2 ;[J];;年期

3 ;[J];;年期

4 ;[J];;年期

5 ;[J];;年期

6 ;[J];;年期

7 ;[J];;年期

8 ;[J];;年期

9 ;[J];;年期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 朱艷燕;3721將CNNIC告上法庭[N];中華工商時報;2004年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 李勤;清前期工商管理法律思想試析[D];中國政法大學(xué);2001年

，

本文編號：2207403