發(fā)布時(shí)間：2018-08-03 21:14

【摘要】：異地侵權(quán)責(zé)任的準(zhǔn)據(jù)法確定必須重視對(duì)受害人權(quán)益的保護(hù),但如何實(shí)現(xiàn)歷來是一個(gè)難題。對(duì)此,我國剛剛生效的涉外民事關(guān)系法律適用法無論是一般規(guī)定還是侵權(quán)行為的相關(guān)規(guī)定都未作任何規(guī)定。因此顯然有必要對(duì)新法的相關(guān)規(guī)定予以修訂。而各國的確定異地侵權(quán)行為準(zhǔn)據(jù)法的立法例大致可分為侵權(quán)行為實(shí)施地、侵害結(jié)果發(fā)生地及偏在理論等三種方式。由于過度強(qiáng)調(diào)加害人的利益,第一種方式不宜采用。而由于兼顧對(duì)受害人權(quán)益和當(dāng)事人雙方預(yù)見可能性的保護(hù),侵害結(jié)果發(fā)生地的方式顯然更為合理。因此,在很難大幅擴(kuò)充特殊侵權(quán)責(zé)任單獨(dú)規(guī)定的情況下,法律適用法第44條前半部分宜轉(zhuǎn)采以侵害結(jié)果發(fā)生地為系屬的準(zhǔn)據(jù)法確定方式。
[Abstract]:The applicable law of tort liability in different places must pay attention to the protection of victims' rights and interests, but how to realize it has always been a difficult problem. In this regard, the law applicable to civil relations concerning foreign affairs, which has just come into effect in China, has not made any provisions either in general or in the relevant provisions of tort. Therefore, it is clearly necessary to amend the relevant provisions of the new law. The legislative cases of determining the applicable law of tort in different countries can be roughly divided into three ways: the place where the tort is committed, the place where the result of infringement occurs and the deviation in theory. As too much emphasis on the interests of perpetrators, the first approach should not be used. However, due to the protection of victims' rights and interests and the possibility of both parties' foresight, the way of infringing the place of occurrence is obviously more reasonable. Therefore, if it is difficult to expand the special tort liability separately, the first part of article 44 of the applicable law should adopt the method of determining the law which belongs to the place where the result of infringement occurs.
【作者單位】： 上海海事大學(xué)法學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：D920.0
，

本文編號(hào)：2163015