【摘要】： 在現(xiàn)代市場經(jīng)濟條件下,消費者有自主選擇何種商品和服務(wù)的自由,經(jīng)營者有在法律法規(guī)限度內(nèi)自主安排經(jīng)營方式和服務(wù)內(nèi)容的自由,當(dāng)二者利益發(fā)生沖突時法律必將在其間作出一定的考量和取舍,但由于我國當(dāng)前的法律對此并未作出明確規(guī)定,類似案件的判決有時又完全相反,因此,在當(dāng)前法制環(huán)境下,對于“謝絕自帶酒水”和收取“開瓶費”合法、合理與否給予一個清晰的定位就顯得很有必要。本文以京城首例開瓶費案為分析視角,通過對該案態(tài)度迥異的一、二審判決的詳細介紹與評析,對本案所折射出來的諸如開瓶費規(guī)定的合法性與合理性、政府干預(yù)與行業(yè)規(guī)制的作用與限度、民意對司法活動的影響以及司法者應(yīng)秉持的態(tài)度等問題進行較深入的探討與分析。 全篇共分為四章： 第一章對北京首例開瓶費的案情、案件的主要爭議事實、以及一、二審判決的結(jié)果及主要依據(jù)作全面介紹。 第二章對一、二審判決的判決理由、法律適用、各方對法院判決的爭議以及兩審法院對開瓶費問題態(tài)度的微妙轉(zhuǎn)化、應(yīng)對民意技巧等方面作全面評析,同時進一步分析一、二審判決在法律適用及司法導(dǎo)向功能上的優(yōu)劣。 第三章從我國當(dāng)前相關(guān)部門法的角度就本案中“謝絕自帶酒水”、“開瓶費”等酒店單方做法的合法性、合理性展開論證并探討可能出現(xiàn)的例外情形。 第四章就開瓶費案引發(fā)的相關(guān)問題,從政府干預(yù)和行業(yè)規(guī)制的作用與必要限度、民眾意識、司法者的態(tài)度等多角度討論類似糾紛的解決機制以及其對我國法治建設(shè)的若干啟示。
[Abstract]:Under the conditions of modern market economy, consumers have the freedom to choose what goods and services they want, and operators have the freedom to arrange their own business methods and service contents within the limits of laws and regulations. When the interests of the two conflicts occur, the law will certainly make certain considerations and trade-offs. However, because the current law of our country does not make a clear provision on this, and the judgments of similar cases are sometimes completely opposite, therefore, in the current legal environment, It is necessary to refuse to bring your own wine and charge the fee for opening the bottle. Whether it is reasonable or not, it is very necessary. From the perspective of Beijing's first case of bottle opening fee, through the detailed introduction and evaluation of the judgment of the second instance, which has different attitudes in this case, this paper reflects the legality and reasonableness of the legal provisions such as the fee for opening the bottle, which is reflected in this case. The role and limitation of government intervention and industry regulation, the influence of public opinion on judicial activities and the attitude of judicial personnel should be discussed and analyzed deeply. The whole chapter is divided into four chapters: the first chapter gives a comprehensive introduction to the case of Beijing's first bottle opening fee, the main controversial facts of the case, and the results and main basis of the first and second instance judgment. The second chapter makes a comprehensive assessment of the reasons for the judgment of the first and second instance judgments, the application of the law, the disputes between the parties to the court's decisions, the subtle transformation of the court's attitude towards the issue of bottle opening fees, and the skills of public opinion, etc. At the same time, it further analyzes one. The merits and demerits of the second instance judgment in the application of law and the function of judicial guidance. The third chapter discusses the legitimacy and rationality of the unilateral practice of "refusing to bring wine" and "bottle opening fee" in this case from the angle of the current relevant department law of our country and discusses the possible exceptions. The fourth chapter discusses the solving mechanism of similar disputes and its enlightenment to the construction of the rule of law in our country from the functions and necessary limits of government intervention and industry regulation, the public consciousness, the attitude of the judiciary and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2010
【分類號】：D920.5

【相似文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 張法榮;略論新時期行業(yè)協(xié)會的發(fā)展[J];山東行政學(xué)院.山東省經(jīng)濟管理干部學(xué)院學(xué)報;2002年05期

2 張經(jīng);行業(yè)協(xié)會要拍馬出擊[J];政策w，

本文編號：2151323