論地方立法的協(xié)調(diào)
發(fā)布時間：2018-07-23 21:17
【摘要】： 本文是對我國新興的地方立法協(xié)調(diào)制度進行的一個綜合性探討。第一部分,圍繞現(xiàn)有的學術(shù)研究和具體的地方立法協(xié)調(diào)實踐,對地方立法以及地方立法協(xié)調(diào)做出一個初步的定義。 第二部分,是對地方立法協(xié)調(diào)的必要性進行分析,指出它對提高立法質(zhì)量、維護法制統(tǒng)一、構(gòu)建法治政府、促進執(zhí)法規(guī)范化和管理科學化、整合區(qū)域優(yōu)勢、促進區(qū)域經(jīng)濟協(xié)調(diào)快速發(fā)展具有重大的意義。 第三部分主要分為三個板塊,第一個板塊主要是考察外國的地方立法協(xié)調(diào)經(jīng)驗,特別是歐盟的立法協(xié)調(diào)制度,因為歐盟的區(qū)域一體化程度更高、地方立法協(xié)調(diào)機制更為成熟且資料也更為豐富;第二個板塊,是對我國現(xiàn)有的地方立法協(xié)調(diào)機制的介紹,主要圍繞已經(jīng)開始制度化努力的東北模式和江西模式進行論述。第三個板塊,從法治的宏觀角度對既有模式所存在的諸多問題和不足做出評議。這些問題和不足包括:正式立法協(xié)調(diào)機構(gòu)的缺失、協(xié)調(diào)的對象不夠?qū)�、可能的地方保護主義和地方權(quán)力不足、與國家法的潛在沖突等。 第四部分,鑒于現(xiàn)存的問題,提出完善這一制度的各項初步建議。這些建議分為兩個板塊,第一個板塊是從中央層面考察,指出地方立法協(xié)調(diào)的完善需要中央制定區(qū)域經(jīng)濟基本法、確立正式審查制度、設立全國性的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟領(lǐng)導機構(gòu),統(tǒng)一領(lǐng)導和協(xié)調(diào)區(qū)域發(fā)展工作;第二個板塊從地方層面進行分析,認為地方公權(quán)力機關(guān)應做好以下幾方面的工作。首先,應該有個科學的步驟安排,即以完成本省內(nèi)的立法協(xié)調(diào)為前提,再謀求省際層面的合作。其次要簽署平等互利的合作協(xié)議并設立正式協(xié)調(diào)機構(gòu)。再次,要建立立法信息交流制度和交叉?zhèn)浒钢贫�。最�?應當確立立法協(xié)調(diào)機制的跟蹤評估制度和制定區(qū)域利益補償和共享機制。 第五部分,指出,地方立法協(xié)調(diào)制度是維護國家法制統(tǒng)一的重要手段,是建立現(xiàn)代法治政府的應有之義。因此,它的存在和發(fā)展不是孤立的。要實現(xiàn)地方立法協(xié)調(diào)機制的完全制度化,充分發(fā)揮其作用,還必須在整個宏觀的法治層面上認識和把握它。這就需要諸如信息公開、公眾參與、中央與地方關(guān)系的調(diào)整等其他法治建設的同步跟進。
[Abstract]:This article is a comprehensive discussion on the new local legislation coordination system in China. The first part, focusing on the existing academic research and specific local legislation coordination practice, makes a preliminary definition of local legislation and local legislation coordination. The second part analyzes the necessity of the coordination of local legislation, points out that it can improve the quality of legislation, maintain the unity of legal system, construct a government ruled by law, promote the standardization of law enforcement and scientific management, and integrate regional advantages. It is of great significance to promote the coordinated and rapid development of regional economy. The third part is mainly divided into three sections. The first section mainly examines the experience of local legislation harmonization in foreign countries, especially the European Union's legislative harmonization system, because the European Union has a higher degree of regional integration. The local legislation coordination mechanism is more mature and the data is more abundant. The second part is the introduction of the existing local legislation coordination mechanism in China, mainly focusing on the northeast model and Jiangxi model, which have begun to institutionalize efforts. The third plate, from the macro point of view of the rule of law, the existing model of many problems and shortcomings to comment. These problems include: the lack of formal legislative coordination mechanism, the lack of broad targets, the possible local protectionism and insufficient local power, the potential conflict with national law and so on. The fourth part, in view of the existing problems, put forward some preliminary suggestions to perfect this system. These proposals are divided into two parts. The first is to investigate from the central level, pointing out that the perfection of the coordination of local legislation requires the central authorities to formulate the basic law of regional economy, establish a formal review system, and set up a national regional economic leading body. The second part analyzes from the local level and thinks that the local public authority should do the following work well. First of all, there should be a scientific arrangement, that is, to complete the coordination of the province's legislation, and then seek inter-provincial cooperation. Second, we should sign a cooperation agreement on equality and mutual benefit and set up a formal coordinating body. Thirdly, we should establish legislation information exchange system and cross-record system. Finally, we should establish the system of tracking and evaluation of the legislative coordination mechanism and establish the mechanism of regional interest compensation and sharing. The fifth part points out that the coordination system of local legislation is an important means to maintain the unity of national legal system and is the proper meaning of establishing a modern government ruled by law. Therefore, its existence and development are not isolated. In order to realize the complete institutionalization of the coordination mechanism of local legislation and give full play to its role, we must recognize and grasp it at the level of the whole macroscopic rule of law. This requires the simultaneous follow-up of other legal developments, such as information disclosure, public participation, and the adjustment of central and local relations.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D920.0
本文編號：2140678
[Abstract]:This article is a comprehensive discussion on the new local legislation coordination system in China. The first part, focusing on the existing academic research and specific local legislation coordination practice, makes a preliminary definition of local legislation and local legislation coordination. The second part analyzes the necessity of the coordination of local legislation, points out that it can improve the quality of legislation, maintain the unity of legal system, construct a government ruled by law, promote the standardization of law enforcement and scientific management, and integrate regional advantages. It is of great significance to promote the coordinated and rapid development of regional economy. The third part is mainly divided into three sections. The first section mainly examines the experience of local legislation harmonization in foreign countries, especially the European Union's legislative harmonization system, because the European Union has a higher degree of regional integration. The local legislation coordination mechanism is more mature and the data is more abundant. The second part is the introduction of the existing local legislation coordination mechanism in China, mainly focusing on the northeast model and Jiangxi model, which have begun to institutionalize efforts. The third plate, from the macro point of view of the rule of law, the existing model of many problems and shortcomings to comment. These problems include: the lack of formal legislative coordination mechanism, the lack of broad targets, the possible local protectionism and insufficient local power, the potential conflict with national law and so on. The fourth part, in view of the existing problems, put forward some preliminary suggestions to perfect this system. These proposals are divided into two parts. The first is to investigate from the central level, pointing out that the perfection of the coordination of local legislation requires the central authorities to formulate the basic law of regional economy, establish a formal review system, and set up a national regional economic leading body. The second part analyzes from the local level and thinks that the local public authority should do the following work well. First of all, there should be a scientific arrangement, that is, to complete the coordination of the province's legislation, and then seek inter-provincial cooperation. Second, we should sign a cooperation agreement on equality and mutual benefit and set up a formal coordinating body. Thirdly, we should establish legislation information exchange system and cross-record system. Finally, we should establish the system of tracking and evaluation of the legislative coordination mechanism and establish the mechanism of regional interest compensation and sharing. The fifth part points out that the coordination system of local legislation is an important means to maintain the unity of national legal system and is the proper meaning of establishing a modern government ruled by law. Therefore, its existence and development are not isolated. In order to realize the complete institutionalization of the coordination mechanism of local legislation and give full play to its role, we must recognize and grasp it at the level of the whole macroscopic rule of law. This requires the simultaneous follow-up of other legal developments, such as information disclosure, public participation, and the adjustment of central and local relations.
【學位授予單位】：西南政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2009
【分類號】：D920.0
【參考文獻】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條
1 保建云;;地方利益沖突、地方保護主義與政策選擇分析[J];國家行政學院學報;2007年06期
2 王鑒輝;我國地方立法的價值取向研究初探[J];現(xiàn)代法學;2002年02期
，本文編號：2140678
本文鏈接：http://sikaile.net/falvlunwen/fashilw/2140678.html
